Low numbers of ovarian follicles ≥3mm in diameter are associated with low fertility in dairy cows

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 95, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 2355-2361

  Mossa, F ^a   Walsh, S W ^a   Butler, S T ^b   Berry, D P ^b   Carter, F ^a   Lonergan, P ^a   Smith, G W ^c   Ireland, J J ^c   Evans, A C O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b TEAGASC   (Ireland)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dairy cow; Fertility; Follicle number

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CELL COUNT; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HISTOLOGY; OVARY; OVARY FOLLICLE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CELL COUNT; FEMALE; FERTILITY; OVARIAN FOLLICLE; OVARY; PREGNANCY;

ANIMALIA; BOS; FRIESIA;

EID: 84860238290     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4325     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Adams G.P., Evans A.C., Rawlings N.C. Follicular waves and circulating gonadotropins in 8-month-old prepubertal heifers. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1994, 100:27-33.
2. Adams G.P., Matteri R.L., Kastelic J.P., Ko J.C., Ginther O.J. Association between surges of follicle-stimulating hormone and the emergence of follicular waves in heifers. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1992, 94:177-188.
3. Burns D.S., Jimenez-Krassel F., Ireland J.L., Knight P.G., Ireland J.J. Numbers of antral follicles during follicular waves in cattle: Evidence for high variation among animals, very high repeatability in individuals, and an inverse association with serum follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations. Biol. Reprod. 2005, 73:54-62.
4. Diskin M.G., Morris D.G. Embryonic and early foetal losses in cattle and other ruminants. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2008, 43(Suppl. 2):260-267.
5. Erickson B.H. Development and senescence of the postnatal bovine ovary. J. Anim. Sci. 1966, 25:800-805.
6. Erickson B.H., Reynolds R.A., Murphree R.L. Ovarian characteristics and reproductive performance of the aged cow. Biol. Reprod. 1976, 15:555-560.
7. Evans A.C. Characteristics of ovarian follicle development in domestic animals. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2003, 38:240-246.
8. Evans A.C.O., Mossa F., Fair T., Lonergan P., Butler S.T., Zielak-Steciwko A.E., Smith G.W., Jimenez-Krassel F., Folger J.K., Ireland J.L.H., Ireland J.J. Causes and consequences of the variation in the number of ovarian follicles in cattle. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 2010, 67:421-429.
9. Fortune J.E., Sirois J., Turzillo A.M., Lavoir M. Follicle selection in domestic ruminants. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 1991, 43:187-198.
10. Fricke P.M. Scanning the future-Ultrasonography as a reproductive management tool for dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85:1918-1926.
11. Ginther O.J., Kastelic J.P., Knopf L. Composition and characteristics of follicular waves during the bovine estrous cycle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1989, 20:187-200.
12. Ireland J.J., Smith G.W., Scheetz D., Jimenez-Krassel F., Folger J.K., Ireland J.L.H., Mossa F., Lonergan P., Evans A.C.O. Does size matter in females? An overview of the impact of the high variation in the ovarian reserve on ovarian function and fertility, utility of anti-Mullerian hormone as a diagnostic marker for fertility and causes of variation in the ovarian reserve in cattle. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2011, 23:1-14.
13. Ireland J.J., Ward F., Jimenez-Krassel F., Ireland J.L., Smith G.W., Lonergan P., Evans A.C. Follicle numbers are highly repeatable within individual animals but are inversely correlated with FSH concentrations and the proportion of good-quality embryos after ovarian stimulation in cattle. Hum. Reprod. 2007, 22:1687-1695.
14. Ireland J.L., Scheetz D., Jimenez-Krassel F., Themmen A.P., Ward F., Lonergan P., Smith G.W., Perez G.I., Evans A.C., Ireland J.J. Antral follicle count reliably predicts number of morphologically healthy oocytes and follicles in ovaries of young adult cattle. Biol. Reprod. 2008, 79:1219-1225.
15. Jimenez-Krassel F., Folger J.K., Ireland J.L., Smith G.W., Hou X., Davis J.S., Lonergan P., Evans A.C., Ireland J.J. Evidence that high variation in ovarian reserves of healthy young adults has a negative impact on the corpus luteum and endometrium during estrous cycles in cattle. Biol. Reprod. 2009, 80:1272-1281.
16. Lussier J.G., Matton P., Dufour J.J. Growth rates of follicles in the ovary of the cow. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1987, 81:301-307.
17. Malhi P.S., Adams G.P., Singh J. Bovine model for the study of reproductive aging in women: Follicular, luteal, and endocrine characteristics. Biol. Reprod. 2005, 73:45-53.
18. McNeill R.E., Diskin M.G., Sreenan J.M., Morris D.G. Associations between milk progesterone concentration on different days and with embryo survival during the early luteal phase in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2006, 65:1435-1441.
19. Mossa F., Jimenez-Krassel F., Folger J.K., Ireland J.L., Smith G.W., Lonergan P., Evans A.C., Ireland J.J. Evidence that high variation in antral follicle count during follicular waves is linked to alterations in ovarian androgen production in cattle. Reproduction 2010, 140:713-720.
20. Mossa F., Jimenez-Krassel F., Walsh S., Berry D.P., Butler S.T., Folger J., Smith G.W., Ireland J.L., Lonergan P., Ireland J.J., Evans A.C. Inherent capacity of the pituitary gland to produce gonadotropins is not influenced by the number of ovarian follicles ≥3mm in diameter in cattle. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2010, 22:550-557.
21. Singh J., Dominguez M., Jaiswal R., Adams G.P. A simple ultrasound test to predict the superstimulatory response in cattle. Theriogenology 2004, 62:227-243.
22. Sirois J., Fortune J.E. Ovarian follicular dynamics during the estrous cycle in heifers monitored by real-time ultrasonography. Biol. Reprod. 1988, 39:308-317.
23. Starbuck-Clemmer M.J., Hernandez-Fonseca H., Ahmad N., Seidel G., Inskeep E.K. Association of fertility with numbers of antral follicles within a follicular wave during the oestrous cycle in beef cattle. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2007, 42:337-342.
24. Stronge A.J., Sreenan J.M., Diskin M.G., Mee J.F., Kenny D.A., Morris D.G. Post-insemination milk progesterone concentration and embryo survival in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2005, 64:1212-1224.