Enhancing performance and accuracy of ontology integration by propagating priorly matchable concepts

Neurocomputing

Volumn 88, Issue , 2012, Pages 3-12

  Duong, Trong Hai ^a   Jo, Geun Sik ^a  

^a Inha University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Concept importance; Concept type and priorly matchable concept; Ontology; Ontology alignment; Ontology integration; Ontology matching

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT IMPORTANCE; CONCEPT TYPES; ONTOLOGY ALIGNMENT; ONTOLOGY INTEGRATION; ONTOLOGY MATCHING;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; ONTOLOGY;

INTEGRATION;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SCIENCE; ONTOLOGY INTEGRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPAGATING PRIORLY MATCHABLE CONCEPT;

EID: 84860226430     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: 18728286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2011.04.048     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Duong T.H., Nguyen N.T., Jo G.S. A method for integration of wordnet-based ontologies using distance measures. Proceedings of KES 2008, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2008, vol. 5177:210-219.
2. Duong T.H., Nguyen N.T., Jo G.S. A method for integrating multiple ontologies. Cybern. Syst. 2009, 40(2):123-145.
3. Duong T.H., Jo G.S., Jung J.J., Nguyen N.T. Complexity analysis of ontology integration methodologies: a comparative study. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 2009, 15(4):877-897.
4. Duong T.H., Cha S.J., Jo G.S. A effective method for ontology integration by propagating inconsistency. Second International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering 2010, 41-46.
5. Duong T.H., Jo G.S. Collaborative ontology building by reaching consensus among participants. Inf. Int. Interdiscip. J. 2010, 13(5):1557-1569.
6. Gang W., Juanzi L., Ling F., Kehong W. Identifying potentially important concepts and relations in an ontology. Proceedings of International Semantic Web Conference '2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2008, vol. 5318:33-49.
7. Guarino N., Welty C. Ontological analysis of taxonomic relationships. Proceedings of ER-2000, The 19th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling 2000, vol. 1920:210-224. Springer-Verlag.
8. W. Hu, G. Cheng, D. Zheng, X. Zhong, Y. Qu, The results of Falcon-AO in the OAEI 2006 campaign, in: Proceedings of Ontology Matching (OM-2006), 2006, pp. 124-133.
9. W. Hu, Y. Zhao, Y. Qu, Partition-based block matching of large class hierarchies, in: Proceedings of the 1st Asian Semantic Web Conference (ASWC2006), 2006, pp. 72-83.
10. Leacock C., Chodorow M. Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database 1998, 265-283. MIT Press. C. Fellbaum (Ed.).
11. Marc E., York S. Ontology mapping-an integrated approach. Proceedings of the 1st ESWS, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Heraklion, Greece, May 2004, vol. 3053:76-91. Springer Verlag.
12. Mao M., Peng Y., Spring M. An adaptive ontology mapping approach with neural network based constraint satisfaction. J. Web Semantics 2010, 8(1):14-25.
13. N.F. Noy, M.A. Musen, Anchor-PROMPT: using non-local context for semantic matching, in: Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing at the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2001), Seattle, WA, 2001, pp. 242-258.
14. Noy N.F., Musen M.A. The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. Int. J. Human Comput. Stud. 2003, 59:983-1024.
15. Nguyen N.T. Processing inconsistency of knowledge in determining knowledge of a collective. Cybern. Syst. 2009, 40(8):670-688.
16. Nguyen N.T. A method for ontology conflict resolution and integration on relation level. Cybern. Syst. 2007, 38(8):781-797.
17. Nguyen N.T. Conflicts of ontologies-classification and consensus-based methods for resolving. Proceedings of KES 2006, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2006, vol. 4252:267-274.
18. Seddiqui H., Masaki A. An efficient and scalable algorithm for segmented alignment of ontologies of arbitrary size. J. Web Semantics 2009, 7:344-356.
19. Pedersen T., Patwardhan S., Michelizzi J. WordNet::Similarity-measuring the relatedness of concepts. Proceedings of NAACL 2004.
20. Pinto H.S., Martins J.P. A methodology for ontology integration. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture 2001, 131-138. ACM Press.
21. Resnik, Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a Taxonomy, in: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Canada, 1995, pp. 448-453.
22. Tang J., Li J., Liang B., Huang X., Li Y., Wang K. Using Bayesian decision for ontology mapping. J. Web Semantics 2006, 4(4):243-262.
23. Uschold M., Gruninger M. Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 1996, 11:93-155.
24. Wu Z., Palmer M. Verb semantics and lexical selection. 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 1994, 133-138.