Semiautomated QT interval measurement in electrocardiograms from a thorough QT study: Comparison of the grouped and ungrouped superimposed median beat methods

Journal of Electrocardiology

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 225-230

  Hingorani, Pooja ^a   Karnad, Dilip R ^a   Ramasamy, Arumugam ^a   Panicker, Gopi Krishna ^a   Salvi, Vaibhav ^a   Bhoir, Hemant ^a   Kothari, Snehal ^a  

^a IQVIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Acquired long QT syndrome; Arrhythmias; Cardiac repolarization; Electrocardiography; QT prolongation; Sudden cardiac death

Indexed keywords

MOXIFLOXACIN; PLACEBO;

ALGORITHM; CONFERENCE PAPER; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GROUPED SUPERIMPOSED MEDIAN BEAT METHOD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QT INTERVAL; QT PROLONGATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; T WAVE; TIME; UNGROUPED SUPERIMPOSED MEDIAN BEAT METHOD; WAVEFORM;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; LONG QT SYNDROME; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84860221431     PISSN: 00220736     EISSN: 15328430     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2012.01.007     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) E14 guidance on clinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for non-antiarrythmic drugs http://www.fda.gov/downloads/RegulatoryInformation/ Guidances/UCM129357.pdf 2005 (Accessed on 11th August 2011)
2. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline E14 Questions and Answers The clinical evaluation of QT/ QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for nonantiarrhythmic drugs http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/ GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM073161.pdf 2008 (Accessed on 11th August, 2011)
3. P. Kligfield Electrocardiography and repolarization abnormalities in cardiac safety: benefits and limitations of fully automated methods for QT measurement Comput Cardiol 37 2010 253
4. B. Tyl, M. Kabbaj, and B. Fassi Comparison of semiautomated and fully automated methods for QT measurement during a thorough QT/QTc study: variability and sample size considerations J Clin Pharmacol 49 2009 905
5. N. Sarapa, S.F. Francom, and S. Azzam Detection of clinically significant QTc prolongation in phase I studies in healthy participants: comparison of 2 semiautomated QT measurement methods J Clin Pharmacol 49 2009 103
6. B. Hug, R. Abbas, C. Leister, J. Burns, and D. Sonnichsen A single-dose, crossover, placebo- and moxifloxacin-controlled study to assess the effects of neratinib (HKI-272) on cardiac repolarization in healthy adult subjects Clin Cancer Res 16 2010 4016
7. V. Salvi, D.R. Karnad, G.K. Panicker, and S. Kothari Update on the evaluation of a new drug for effects on cardiac repolarization in humans: issues in early drug development Br J Pharmacol 159 2010 34
8. V. Salvi, D.R. Karnad, and G.K. Panicker Comparison of 5 methods of QT interval measurements on electrocardiograms from a thorough QT/QTc study: effect on assay sensitivity and categorical outliers J Electrocardiol 44 2011 96
9. F. Badilini, and N. Sarapa Implications of methodological differences in digital electrocardiogram interval measurement J Electrocardiol 39 2006 S152
10. J.Q. Xue QT interval measurement: what can we really expect? Comput Cardiol 33 2006 385
11. D.W. Mortara Automated QT measurement and application to detection of moxifloxacin-induced changes Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 14 2009 S30
12. P. Kligfield, B. Tyl, M. Maarek, and P. Maison-Blanche Magnitude, mechanism, and reproducibility of QT interval differences between superimposed global and individual lead ECG complexes ANE 12 2007 145