Simulation of the effect of intensive forest management on forest production in Sweden

Forests

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 373-393

  Nilsson, Urban ^a   Fahlvik, Nils ^a   Johansson, Ulf ^a   Lundström, Anders ^a   Rosvall, Ola ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b THE FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Fertilization; Genetics; Plantation forestry; Scenarios; Tree species

Indexed keywords

FERTILIZATION; GENETICS; PLANTATION FORESTRY; SCENARIOS; TREE SPECIES;

CONSERVATION; INDUSTRY; PLANT CELL CULTURE; PLANTS (BOTANY); SEED;

REFORESTATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVERGREEN TREE; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOREST PRODUCT; NATURE CONSERVATION; PLANTATION FORESTRY;

CONSERVATION; FERTILIZATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; GENETICS; PLANTATIONS; SEEDS; SWEDEN;

SWEDEN;

LARIX; PICEA ABIES; PICEA SITCHENSIS; PINUS CONTORTA;

EID: 84860176697     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19994907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/f2010373     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Wahlgren, A. Skogsskötsel: Handledning vid uppdragande, vård och föryngring av skog; Norstedt: Stockholm, Sweden, 1914; p. 728.
2. Kardell, L. Svenskarna och Skogen. Del 2. Från baggböleri till naturvård; Skogsstyrelsen: Jönköping, Sweden, 2004; p. 302.
3. Forestry Statistics 2010. Official Statistics of Sweden (in Swedish with English summary and tables); Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Umeå, Sweden, 2010.
4. Tamm, C.-O. Nitrogen in Terrestrial Ecosystems-Questions of Productivity, Vegetational Changes, and Ecosystem Stability; Ecological Studies 81; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1991; p. 115.
5. Enander, K.G. Ekologi, skog och miljö. Vetenskap och idéer under 300 år; Report 4; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Ecology and Management: Umeå, Sweden, 2007; p. 262.
6. Lindkvist, A.; Kardell, O.; Nordlund, C. Intensive forestry as progress or decay? An analysis of the debate about forest fertilization in Sweden, 1960-2010. Forests 2011, 2, 112-146.
7. Hånell, B. Möjlighet till höjning av skogsproduktionen i Sverige genom dikesrensning, dikning och gödsling av torvmarker. In Skogsskötsel för ökad tillväxt. Faktaunderlag till MINT-utredningen; Fahlvik, N., Johansson, U., Nilsson, U., Eds.; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Uppsala, Sweden, 2009; p. 28.
8. Fox, T.R.; Jokela, E.J.; Allen, H.L. The development of pine plantation silviculture in the southern United States. J. Forest. 2007, 105, 337-347.
9. Nilsson, L.-O.; Wiklund, K. Nitrogen uptake in a Norway spruce stand following ammonium sulphate application, fertigation, irrigation, drought and nitrogen-free-fertilisation. Plant Soil 1994, 164, 221-229.
10. Nilsson, L.-O. Manipulation of conventional forest management practices to increase forest growth-Results from the Skogaby project. Forest. Ecol. Manage. 1997, 91, 53-60.
11. Eriksson, H.; Johansson, U. Yields of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in two consecutive rotations in southwestern Sweden. Plant Soil 1993, 154, 239-247.
12. Rosvall, O.; Jacobsson, S.; Karlsson, B.; Lundström, A. Ökad produktion-trots ökad naturvård? Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2004.
13. Rosvall, O.; Jacobsson, S.; Karlsson, B.; Lundström, A. Ökad avverkningspotential med intensivare skogsskötsel; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2004.
14. Lundström A.; Söderberg U. Outline of the Hugin system for long-term forecasts of timber yields and possible cut. In Large-Scale Forestry Scenario Models: Experiences and Requirements; Päivinen, R., Roihuvuo, L., Siitonen, M., Eds.; EFI: Joensuu, Finland, 1996; pp. 63-77.
15. Rosvall, O.; Normark, E. Ökad tillväxt och virkesproduktion i Holmens skogar. Den fullständiga utredningen; Holmen skog: Örnsköldsvik, Sweden, 2006.
16. Simonsen, R.; Rosvall, O.; Gong, P.; Wibe, S. Profitability of measures to increase forest growth. Forest. Policy Econ. 2010, 12, 473-482.
17. Rosvall, O. Produktionspotentialen är betydligt högre än dagens tillväxt. Kungl. Skogs-och Lantbruksakad. Tidskr. 2007, 4, 13-30.
18. Eriksson, L.; Gullberg, T.; Woxblom, L. Skogsbruksmetoder för privatskogsbrukaren; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Products: Uppsala, Sweden, 2008; p. 201.
19. Skogliga konsekvensanalyser 2008-SKA-VB 08; Skogsstyrelsen: Jönköping, Sweden, 2008; p. 146.
20. Mason, W.L.; Perks, M.P. Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) forests in Atlantic Europe: Changes in forest management and possible consequences for carbon sequestration. Scand. J. Forest. Res. 2011, in press.
21. Bell, F.W.; Douglas, G.P.; Wester, M.C. Is intensive forest management a misnomer? An Ontario-based discussion of terminology and an alternative approach. Forest. Chron. 2006, 82, 662-674.
22. Carmean, W.H. Intensive plantation management for good-site forest land in northwest Ontario. Forest. Chron. 2007, 83, 41-53.
23. McPherson, S.; Bell, F.W.; Leach, J.; Street, P.; Stinson, A. Applying research for enhanced productivity on the Canadian Ecology Centre-Forestry research partnership forests. Forest. Chron. 2008, 84, 653-665.
24. Park, A.; Wilson, E.R. Beautiful plantations: Can intensive silviculture help Canada to fulfill ecological and timber production objectives? Forest. Chron. 2007, 83, 825-839.
25. Allen, H.L.; Fox, T.R.; Campell, R.G. What is ahead for intensive pine plantation silviculture in the South? South. J. Appl. Forest. 2005, 29, 62-69.
26. Bergh, J.; Nilsson, U.; Kjartansson, B.; Karlsson, M. Impact of climate change on the productivity of silver birch, Norway spruce and Scots pine stands in Sweden and economic implications for timber production. Ecol. Bull. 2010, 53, 185-196.
27. Lundström, A.; Glimskär, A. Definitioner, tillgängliga arealer och konsekvensberäkningar. Faktaunderlag till MINT-utredningen; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Uppsala, Sweden, 2009; p. 31.
28. McElhinny, C.; Gibbons, P.; Brack, C.; Bauhus, J. Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: Its definition and measurement. Forest. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 218, 1-24.
29. Whitman, A.A.; Hagan, J.M. An index to identify late-successional forest in temperate and boreal zones. Forest. Ecol. Manage. 2007, 246, 144-154.
30. Lundström, J.; Öhman, K.; Perhans, K.; Rönnkvist, M.; Gustafsson, L. Cost-effective age structure and geographical distribution of boreal forest reserves. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 48, 133-142.
31. Nilsson, U.; Fahlvik, N. Ekonomisk analys av praktisk produktionsoptimering i gran-planteringar. In Slutrapport för Fiberskogsprogrammet; Bergh, J., Oleskog, G., Eds.; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre: Alnarp, Sweden, 2006; pp. 106-129.
32. Elfving, B. Grundytetillväxtfunktioner för enskilda träd, baserade på data från riksskogstaxeringens permanenta provytor; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Silviculture: Umeå, Sweden, 2004.
33. Ekö, P.M. A Growth Simulator for Swedish Forests Based on Data from the National Forest Survey (in Swedish with English summary); Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of silviculture: Umeå, Sweden, 1985; p. 224.
34. Karlsson, K.; Ulvcroona, T. Field experiment data available for studies of pre-commercial thinning. Skog Trä 2010, 2, 1-33.
35. Nilsson, U.; Agestam, E.; Ekö, P-M.; Elfving, B.; Fahlvik, N.; Johansson, U.; Karlsson, K.; Lundmark, T.; Wallentin, C. Thinning of Scots pine and Norway spruce monocultures in Sweden-Effects of different thinning programmes on stand level gross and net stem volume production. Stud. Forest. Suec. 2010, 219, 1-46.
36. Fahlvik, N., Johansson, U., Nilsson, U. Skogsskötsel för ökad tillväxt. Faktaunderlag till MINT-utredningen; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Uppsala, Sweden, 2009; p. 116.
37. Pettersson, F. Predictive Functions for Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization on Growth over Five Years; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 1994; p. 56.
38. Pettersson, F. Predictive Functions for Total Response in Growth to Nitrogen Fertilization, Duration and Distribution over Time; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 1994; p. 56.
39. Rosvall, O.; Wennström, U. Förädlingseffekter för simulering med Hugin i SKA 08; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2008; p. 38.
40. Larsson-Stern, M. Aspects of Hybrid Larch (Larix × eurolepis Henry) as a Potential Tree Species in Southern Swedish Forestry; Licentiate Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre: Alnarp, Sweden, 2003; p. 28.
41. Bergh, J.; Linder, S.; Lundmark, T.; Elfving, B. The effect of water and nutrient availability on the productivity of Norway spruce in northern Sweden. Foest. Ecol. Manage. 1999, 119, 51-82.
42. Bergh, J.; Linder, S.; Bergström, J. The potential production for Norway spruce in Sweden. Forest. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 204, 1-10.
43. Hägglund, B. Site Index Curves for Norway Spruce in Northern Sweden (in Swedish with English summary); Report 21; Royal College of Forestry, Department of Forest Yield Research: Stockholm, Sweden, 1972; p. 298.
44. Hägglund, B. Site Index Curves for Norway Spruce in Northern Sweden (in Swedish with English summary); Report 24; Royal College of Forestry, Department of Forest Yield Research: Stockholm, Sweden, 1973; p. 49.
45. Hägglund, B. Site Index Curves for Norway Spruce in Northern Sweden (in Swedish with English summary); Report 31; Royal College of Forestry, Department of Forest Yield Research: Stockholm, Sweden, 1974; p. 54.
46. Karlsson, B.; Rosvall, O. Ökad tillgång och användning av förädlade plantor. Slutrapport-Uppdrag om förbättrat växtodlingsmaterial; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2008 .
47. Norfolk, C.J.; Erdle, T.A. Selecting intensive timber management zones as part of a land allocation strategy. Forest. Chron. 2005, 81, 245-255.
48. Nilsson, U.; Luoranen, J.; Kolström, T.; Örlander, G.; Puttonen, P. Reforestation with planting in northern Europe. Scand. J. Forest. Res. 2010, 25, 283-294.
49. Ackzell, L.; Elfving, B.; Lindgren, D. Occurrence of naturally regenerated and planted main crop plants in plantations in boreal Sweden. Forest. Ecol. Manage. 1994, 65, 105-113.