The ICF vs. occupational therapy instruments — similarities and differences from a mental health perspective

World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 5-11

  Haglund, Lena ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

application; ICF; linking instrument

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860171841     PISSN: 14473828     EISSN: 20566077     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/otb.2008.57.1.002     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Refereces
2. Appelby, H., & Tempest, S. (2006). Using change management theory to implement the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in clinical practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. Oct, 477–480.
3. Cieza, A., Chatterji, S., Andersen, C., Cantista, P., Herceg, M., Melvin, J., Stucki, G., & de Bie R. (2004). ICF core sets for depression. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. Suppl 44:128–134
4. Fisher, AG., & Bernspang, B. (1999). Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. (3rd ed.). Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press.
5. Haglund L., & Henriksson C,. (2003). Concepts in occupational therapy in relation to the ICF. Occupational Therapy International 10, 253268.
6. Hellsvik, E M. (1999). Min mening. Version 1.0. Svensk översättning av Karon K, Kielhofner G, Goldhammer V, Wolenski J. Occupation self assessment. FSA. In Swedish
7. Hemmingsson, H,. & Jonsson, H. (2005). An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the international classification of functioning, disability and health — some critical remarks. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 5, 569–576.
8. Holen, E. (2006). Adl-instrument og ICF, fines det likheter. Ergoterapeuten, 5, 46–53. In Danish
9. Kielhofner G. (2002). Model of Human Occupation. (3 ed) Williams & Wilkins Lippincott.
10. Kielhofner G. (2008). Model of Human Occupation. (4 ed) Williams & Wilkins Lippincott.
11. Nordenfelt, L. (2003). Action theory, disability and ICF. Disability and rehabilitation, 18, 1075–1079.
12. Norrby, E., & Linddahl, I. (2006a). Dialog om arbetsförmiga. Version 3.0. FSA. In Swedish
13. Norrby, E., & Linddahl, I. (2006b). Reliability of the instrument DOA: Dialogue about ability related to work. Work 26, 131–139.
14. Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2004). Nursing research, Principles and Methods. J.B.Lippincott Company, Philadelphia
15. Stamm, T., Cieza, A., Machold, K., Smolen, J., & Stucki, G. (2004). Content comparison of occupation-based instruments in adult rheumatology and musculoskeletal rehabilitation based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Arthritis & Rheumatism. Dec, 917–924.
16. Stamm, T., Cieza, A., Machold, K., Smolen, J., & Stucki, G. (2006). Exploration of the link between conceptual occupational therapy models and the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. 53, 9–17.
17. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Position Statement on Human Rights, 2006.Webpage. http//:www.WFOT.org.
18. World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.