Patient discomfort in bitewing examination with film and four digital receptors

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 323-327

  Jorgensen P M ^a   Wenzel, A ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Bitewing examination; Dental; Digital; Patient care; Patient satisfaction; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FACE PAIN; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SEMICONDUCTOR; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY; X RAY FILM;

ADULT; AGED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FACIAL PAIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; SEMICONDUCTORS; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS; X-RAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84860171751     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/73402308     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Wenzel A, Møystad A. Work flow with digital intraoral radiography: A systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 2010;68:106-114.
2. Bahrami G, Hagstrøm C, Wenzel A. Bitewing examination with four digital receptors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:317-321. (Pubitemid 40288486)
3. Matzen LH, Christensen J, Wenzel A. Patient discomfort and retakes in periapical examination of mandibuar third molars using digital receptors and film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:566-572.
4. Hellén-Halme K, Johansson PM, Håkansson J, Petersson A. Image quality of digital and film radiographs sent to the Dental Insurance Office in Sweden for treatment approval. Swed Dent J 2004;28:77-84. (Pubitemid 39530604)
5. Sommers TM, Mauriello SM, Ludlow JB, Platin E, Tyndall DA. Pre-clinical performance comparing intraoral film and CCD systems. Dent Hyg 2002;76:26-33.
6. Lara-Muñoz C, De Leon SP, Feinstein AR, Puente A, Wells CK. Comparison of three rating scales for measuring subjective phenomena in clinical research. I. Use of experimentally controlled auditory stimuli. Arch Med Res 2004;35:43-48. (Pubitemid 38249310)
7. Price DD, McGrath PA, Raffi A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scales measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983;17:45-46.
8. Price DD, Harkins SW. The combined use of visual analogue scales and experimental pain in providing standardized assessment of clinical pain. Clin J Pain 1987;3:3-11.
9. Quiton RL, Greenspan JD. Across and within session variability of ratings of painful contact heat stimuli. Pain 2008;137:245-256. (Pubitemid 351853288)
10. Bentsen B, Svensson P, Wenzel A. Evaluation of effect of 3D video glasses on perceived pain and unpleasantness induced by restorative dental treatment. Eur J Pain 2001;5:373-378. (Pubitemid 34072464)
11. Ram D, Shapira J, Holan G, Magora F, Cohen S, Davidovich E. Audiovisual video eyeglass distraction during dental treatment in children. Quintessence Int 2010;41:673-679.
12. Christiansen R, Kirkevang LL, Hørsted-Bindslev P, Wenzel A. Patient discomfort following periapical surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:245-250.
13. Goncalves A, Wiezel VG, Goncalves M, Hebling J, Sannomiya EK. Patient comfort in periapical examination using digital receptors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:484-488.