DNA copy number changes and immunophenotype pattern in karyotypically normal acute myeloid leukemia patients from an indian population

Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 265-270

  Kawankar, Nikesh ^a   Korgaonkar, Seema ^a   Kerketta, Lily ^a   Madkaikar, Manisha ^a   Jijina, Farah ^b   Ghosh, Kanjaksha ^a   Vundinti, Babu Rao ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF IMMUNOHAEMATOLOGY   (India)

^b KEM HOSPITAL   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ACUTE GRANULOCYTIC LEUKEMIA; ACUTE LEUKEMIA; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CYTOGENETICS; ETHNIC GROUP; HUMAN; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING; INDIA; KARYOTYPE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POPULATION GENETICS; PROGNOSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CYTOGENETICS; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; INDIA; KARYOTYPING; LEUKEMIA, MYELOID, ACUTE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84860170813     PISSN: 19450265     EISSN: 19450257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2011.0174     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. (1976) Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias. French-American-British (FAB) co-operative group. Br J Haematol 33:451-458.
2. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. (1985) Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French-American-British cooperative group. Ann Intern Med 103:620-625.
3. Castuma MV, Rao PH, Acevedo SH, et al. (2000) Comparative genomic hybridization study of de novo myeloid neoplasia. Acta Haematol 104:25-30.
4. Czuczman MS, Dodge RK, Stewart CC, et al. (1999) Value of immunophenotype in intensively treated adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Cancer and leukemia group B study 8364. Blood 93:3931-3939.
5. Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, et al. (1998) The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome AML: Analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The medical research council adult and children's leukaemia working parties. Blood 92:2322-2333.
6. Kim MH, Stewart J, Devlin C, et al. (2001) The application of comparative genomic hybridization as an additional tool in the chromosome analysis of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 126:26-33.
7. Lindvall C, Furge K, Bjorkholm M, et al. (2004) Combined genetic and transcriptional profiling of acute myeloid leukemia with normal and complex karyotypes. Haematologica 89:1072-1081.
8. Pantou D, Tsarouha H, Papadopoulou A, et al. (2003) Cytogenetic profile of unknown primary tumors: Clues for their pathogenesis and clinical management. Neoplasia 5:23-31.
9. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, et al. (1998) High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 20:207-211.
10. Pinkel D, Straume T, Gray JW (1986) Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:2934-2938.
11. Rothe BHG, Schmitz G (1996) Consensus document on leukemia immunophenotyping. European working group on clinical cell analysis (EWGCCA). Leukemia 10:877-895.
12. Shaffer LG, Slovak ML, Campbell LJ (2009) ISCN 2009: An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Karger SB, Basel.
13. Suela J, Alvarez S, Cigudosa JC (2007) DNA profiling by arrayCGH in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Cytogenet Genome Res 118:304-309.
14. Warlick ED, Smith BD (2007) Myelodysplastic syndromes: Review of pathophysiology and current novel treatment approaches. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 7:541-558.
15. Wilkens L, Burkhardt D, Tchinda J, et al. (1999) Cytogenetic aberrations in myelodysplastic syndrome detected by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Diagn Mol Pathol 8:47-53.