Genetic variation and evolution of secondary compounds in native and introduced populations of the invasive Plant Melaleuca quinquenervia

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1398-1412

  Franks, Steven J ^a   Wheeler, Gregory S ^b   Goodnight, Charles ^c  

^a FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INVASIVE PLANT RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological control; EICA hypothesis; Evolutionary constraints; G matrix; Herbivory; Natural selection; Phenotypic evolution

Indexed keywords

PHEROMONE; TERPENE;

ALCOHOL; BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; HERBIVORY; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SHRUB; TERPENE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HEMIPTERA; HERBIVORY; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MELALEUCA; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; UNITED STATES; WEEVIL;

ANIMALS; AUSTRALIA; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FLORIDA; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; HEMIPTERA; HERBIVORY; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MELALEUCA; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHEROMONES; SELECTION, GENETIC; TERPENES; WEEVILS;

MELALEUCA; MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA;

EID: 84860160503     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01524.x     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Adler, L. S., J. Schmitt, and M. D. Bowers 1995. Genetic variation in defensive chemistry in Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae) and its effect on the specialist herbivore Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae). Oecologia 101:75-85.
2. Agrawal, A. A. 1999. Induced responses to herbivory in wild radish: effect on several herbivores and plant fitness. Ecology 80:1713-1723.
3. Agrawal, A. A., J. K. Conner, and S. Rasmann 2010. Tradeoffs and negative correlations in evolutionary ecology. Pp. 243-268 in M. A. Bell, W. F. Eanes, D. J. Futuyma, and J. S. Levinton, eds. Evolution after Darwin: the first 150 years. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
4. Bacigalupe, L. D. 2009. Biological invasions and phenotypic evolution: a quantitative genetic perspective. Biol. Invasions 11:2243-2250.
5. Bakkali, F., S. Averbeck, D. Averbeck, and M. Idaomar 2008. Biological effects of essential oils-a review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 46:446-475.
6. Berenbaum, M. 1983. Coumarins and caterpillars: a case for coevolution. Evolution 37:163-179.
7. Blossey, B., and R. Nötzold 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive non-indigenous plants: a hypothesis. J. Ecol. 83:887-889.
8. Blows, M. W. 2007. A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology. J. Evol. Biol. 20:1-8.
9. Bossdorf, O., H. Auge, L. Lafuma, W. E. Rogers, E. Siemann, and D. Prati 2005. Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144:1-11.
10. Calsbeek, B., and C. J. Goodnight 2009. Empirical comparison of G-matrix test statistics: finding biologically relevant change. Evolution 63:2627-2635.
11. Center, T. D., P. D. Pratt, P. W. Tipping, M. B. Rayamajhi, T. K. Van, S. A. Wineriter, F. A. Dray, and M. Purcell 2006. Field colonization, population growth, and dispersal of Boreioglycaspis melaleucae Moore, a biological control agent of the invasive tree Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.). Blake. Biol. Control 39:363-374.
12. Center, T. D., T. K. Van, M. Rayachhetry, G. R. Buckingham, F. A. Dray, S. A. Wineriter, M. F. Purcell, and P. D. Pratt 2000. Field colonization of the melaleuca snout beetle (Oxyops vitiosa) in south Florida. Biol. Control 19:112-123.
13. Cheverud, J. M., and G. Marroig 2007. Comparing covariance matrices: random skewers method compared to the common principal components model. Genet. Mol. Biol. 30:461-469.
14. Colautti, R. I., J. L. Maron, and S. C. H. Barrett 2009. Common garden comparisons of native and introduced plant populations: latitudinal clines can obscure evolutionary inferences. Evol. Appl. 2:187-199.
15. Colautti, R. I., and S. C. H. Barrett 2011. Population divergence along lines of genetic variance and covariance in the invasive plant Lythrum salicaria in eastern North America. Evolution. 65:2514-2529.
16. Conner, J. K. 2003. Artificial selection: a powerful tool for ecologists. Ecology 84:1650-1660.
17. Conner, J. K., and A. A. Agrawal 2005. Mechanisms of constraints: the contributions of selection and genetic variance to the maintenance of cotyledon number in wild radish. J. Evol. Biol. 18:238-242.
18. Conner, J. K., and D. L. Hartl 2004. A primer of ecological genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
19. Degenhardt, J. 2009. Indirect defense responses to herbivory in grasses. Plant Physiol. 149:96-102.
20. Dray, F. A., B. C. Bennett, and T. D. Center 2006. Invasion history of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake in Florida. Castanea 71:210-225.
21. Dray, F. A., R. E. Hale, P. T. Madeira, B. C. Bennett, and T. D. Center 2009. Concordance between life history traits, invasion history, and allozyme diversity of the Everglades invader Melaleuca quinquenervia. Aquat. Bot. 90:296-302.
22. Ehrlich, P. R., and P. H. Raven 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18:586-608.
23. Eroukhmanoff, F., and E. I. Svensson 2011. Evolution and stability of the G-matrix during the colonization of a novel environment. J. Evol. Biol. 24:1363-1373.
24. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, Harlow, England
25. Fisher, R. A. 1958. The genetical theory of natural selection. Claredon, New York
26. Flury, B. D. 1988. Common principal components and related multivariate models. Wiley, New York
27. Franks, S. J., P. D. Pratt, F. A. Dray, and E. L. Simms 2004. Selection for resistance in invasive plants. Weed Technol. 18:1486-1489.
28. Franks, S. J., P. D. Pratt, F. A. Dray, and E. L. Simms 2008a. No evolution of increased competitive ability or decreased allocation to defense in Melaleuca quinquenervia since release from natural enemies. Biol. Invasions 10:455-466.
29. Franks, S. J., P. D. Pratt, F. A. Dray, and E. L. Simms 2008b. Selection on herbivory resistance and growth rate in an invasive plant. Am. Nat. 171:678-691.
30. Fritz, R. S., and E. L. Simms 1992. Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago
31. Futuyma, D. J., and M. Slatkin 1983. Coevolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
32. Gershenzon, J., and R. Croteau 1991. Terpenoids. Pp. 165-219 in G. A. Rosenthal and M. Berenbaum, eds. Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites. Vol I: the chemical participants. 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA
33. Goodnight, C. J., and J. M. Schwartz 1997. A bootstrap comparison of genetic covariance matrices. Biometrics 53:1026-1039.
34. Hanfling, B., and J. Kollmann 2002. An evolutionary perspective of biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:545-557.
35. Johnson, M. T. J., A. A. Agrawal, J. L. Maron, and J. P. Salminen 2009. Heritability, covariation and natural selection on 24 traits of common evening primrose (Oenothera biennis) from a field experiment. J. Evol. Biol. 22:1295-1307.
36. Karban, R., and A. A. Agrawal 2002. Herbivore offense. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:641-664.
37. Kaufman, S. R., and P. E. Smouse 2001. Comparing indigenous and introduced populations of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) Blake: response of seedlings to water and pH levels. Oecologia 127:487-494.
38. Keane, R. M., and M. J. Crawley 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:164-170.
39. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
40. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
41. Lee, C. E. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:386-391.
42. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
43. Mauricio, R., and M. D. Rausher 1997. Experimental manipulation of putative selective agents provides evidence for the role of natural enemies in the evolution of plant defense. Evolution 51:1435-1444.
44. McKay, J. K., and R. G. Latta 2002. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:285-291.
45. Müller-Schärer, H., U. Schaffner, and T. Steinger 2004. Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:417-422.
46. Mumm, R., M. A. Posthumus, and M. Dicke 2008. Significance of terpenoids in induced indirect plant defence against herbivorous arthropods. Plant Cell Environ. 31:575-585.
47. Navia-Giné, W. G., S. K. Gomez, J. Yuan, F. Chen, and K. L. Korth 2009. Insect-induced gene expression at the core of volatile terpene release in Medicago truncatula. Plant Signal. Behav. 4:636-638.
48. Nerio, L. S., J. Olivero-Verbel, and E. Stashenko 2010. Repellent activity of essential oils: a review. Bioresource Technol. 101:372-378.
49. O'Donnell, K. L., and M. Pigliucci 2010. Selection dynamics in native and introduced Persicaria species. Int. J. Plant Sci. 171:519-528.
50. Orians, C. M., S. Lower, R. S. Fritz, and B. M. Roche 2003. The effects of plant genetic variation and soil nutrients on secondary chemistry and growth in a shrubby willow, Salix sericea: patterns and constraints on the evolution of resistance traits. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 31:233-247.
51. Paré, P. W., and J. H. Tumlinson 1999. Plant volatiles as a defense against insect herbivores. Plant Physiol. 121:325-331.
52. Phillips, P. C. 1998. CPC: common principal components analysis. University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX
53. Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53:1506-1515.
54. Pratt, P. D., S. Wineriter, T. D. Center, M. B. Rayamajhi, and T. K. Van 2004. Boreioglycaspis melaleucae. Pp. 273-274 in J. K. Coombs, G. L. Piper, and A. F. Cofrancesco, eds. Biological control of invasive plants in the United States. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
55. Prentis, P. J., J. R. U. Wilson, E. E. Dormontt, D. M. Richardson, and A. J. Lowe 2008. Adaptive evolution in invasive species. Trends Plant Sci. 13:288-294.
56. Rausher, M. D. 1992. The measurement of selection on quantitative traits-biases due to environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46:616-626.
57. Rayachhetry, M. B., T. K. Van, T. D. Center, and F. Laroche 2001. Dry weight estimation of the aboveground components of Melaleuca quinquenervia trees in southern Florida. For. Ecol. Manage. 142:281-290.
58. Roff, D. 2000. The evolution of the G matrix: selection or drift? Heredity 84:135-142.
59. Sakai, A. K., F. W. Allendorf, J. S. Holt, D. M. Lodge, J. Molofsky, K. A. With, S. Baughman, R. J. Cabin, J. E. Cohen, N. C. Ellstrand, et al. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32:305-332.
60. Serbesoff-King, K. 2003. Melaleuca in Florida: a literature review on the taxonomy, distribution, biology, ecology, economic importance and control measures. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 41:98-112.
61. Sevillano, L. G. M. 2010. Dissertation: the effects of biological control agents on population growth and spread of Melaleuca quinquenervia. The University of Miami, Miami, FL
62. Shaw, F. H., R. G. Shaw, G. S. Wilkinson, and M. H. Turelli 1995. Changes in genetic variances and covariances: G whiz! Evolution 49:1260-1267.
63. Shaw, R. G. 1991. The comparison of quantitative genetic parameters between populations. Evolution 45:143-151.
64. Southwell, I. A., M. F. Russell, C. D. A. Maddox, and G. S. Wheeler 2003. Differential metabolism of 1, 8-cineole in insects. J. Chem. Ecol. 29:83-94.
65. Stinchcombe, J. R., M. T. Rutter, D. S. Burdick, P. Tiffin, M. D. Rausher, and R. Mauricio 2002. Testing for environmentally induced bias in phenotypic estimates of natural selection: theory and practice. Am. Nat. 160:511-523.
66. Theis, N., and M. Lerdau 2003. The evolution of function in plant secondary metabolites. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164:S93-S102.
67. Turner, C. E., T. D. Center, D. W. Burrows, and G. R. Buckingham 1998. Ecology and management of Melaleuca quinquenervia, an invader of wetlands in Florida, U.S.A. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 5:165-178.
68. Unsicker, S. B., G. Kunert, and J. Gershenzon 2009. Protective perfumes: the role of vegetative volatiles in plant defense against herbivores. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12:479-485.
69. Vardman, S. M. 1994. Dissertation: the reproductive ecology of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) Blake. Florida International University, Miami, FL
70. Walsh, B., and M. W. Blows 2009. Abundant genetic variation + strong selection = multivariate genetic constraints: a geometric view of adaptation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Sys. 40:41-59.
71. Wheeler, G. S. 2006. Chemotype variation of the weed Melaleuca quinquenervia influences the biomass and fecundity of the biological control agent Oxyops vitiosa. Biol. Control 36:121-128.
72. Wheeler, G. S., L. M. Massey, and I. A. Southwell 2002. Antipredator defense of biological control agent Oxyops vitiosa is mediated by plant volatiles sequestered from the host plant Melaleuca quinquenervia. J. Chem. Ecol. 28:297-315.
73. Wheeler, G. S., P. D. Pratt, R. M. Giblin-Davis, and K. M. Ordung 2007. Intraspecific variation of Melaleuca quinquenervia leaf oils in its naturalized range in Florida, the Caribbean, and Hawaii. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 35:489-500.
74. Yonekura, R., K. Kawamura, and N. Usio 2009. Microevolution in invasive species: relative importance of genetic drift and natural selection. Japan. J. Ecol. (Otsu) 59:153-158.