Technological change and timing reductions in greenhouse gas emissions

Journal of Productivity Analysis

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 205-216

  Färe, Rolf ^a   Grosskopf, Shawna ^a   Margaritis, Dimitri ^b   Weber, William L ^c  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

^c SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Time substitution; Undesirable outputs

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860150704     PISSN: 0895562X     EISSN: 15730441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11123-011-0232-4     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aldy JE, Stavins RN (2008) Climate policy architectures for the post-kyoto world. Environment 50(3): 8-17.
2. 2 emissions: a nonparametric panel approach. J Public Econ 90: 1347-1363.
3. Barrett S (2009) The coming global climate-technology revolution. J Econ Perspect 23(2): 53-75.
4. Boden T, Marland G, Andres RJ (2009) National CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel burning, cement manufacture, and gas flaring: 1751-2006. Carbon Dioxide information analysis center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. http://cdiac. ornl. gov/trends/emis/tre_coun. html.
5. Bosetti V, Frankel J (2009) Global climate policy architecture and political feasibility: specific formulas and emission targets to attain 460 ppm CO2 concentrations. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, sustainable development series 92. 2009. http://ssrn. com/abstract=1515780.
6. Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2004) Trade, growth, and the environment. J Econ Lit XLII: 7-71.
7. Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1992-2007. US Environmental Protection Agency.
8. European Environment Agency (2006) Greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe 2006. EEA Report No. 9/2006.
9. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Noh D-W, Weber W (2005) Characteristics of a polluting technology: theory and practice. J Econom 126: 469-492.
10. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Margaritis D (2009) Time substitution with application to data envelopment analysis. Mimeo.
11. Heil MT, Selden TM (2001) Carbon emissions and economic development: future trajectories based on historical experience. Environ Dev Econ 6: 63-83.
12. Heston A, Summers R, Aten B (2009) Penn world table version 6. 3, Center for international comparisons of production, income and prices at the University of Pennsylvania, August 2009.
13. 2 emissions and economic growth. J Public Econ 57: 85-101.
14. Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2005) A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecol Econ 54: 164-174.
15. Jeon BM, Sickles RC (2004) The role of environmental factors in growth accounting. J Appl Econom 19: 567-591.
16. Kuosmanen T, Biujsterbosch N, Dellink R (2009) Environmental cost-benefit analysis of alternative timing strategies in greenhouse gas abatement: a data envelopment analysis approach. Ecol Econ 68: 1633-1642.
17. Marquetti A, Foley D (2008) Extended Penn world tables: economic growth data on 118 countries.
18. Newell RG, Jaffe AB, Stavins RN (2006) The effects of economic and policy incentives on carbon mitigation technologies. Energy Econ 28: 563-578.
19. Nordhaus W (2007) Critical assumption in the stern review on climate change. Science 317: 201-202.
20. Schmalansee R, Stoker TM, Judson RA (1998) World carbon dioxide emissions: 1950-2050. Rev Econ Stat 80: 15-27.
21. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Tol RS (2009) The economic effects of climate change. J Econ Perspect 23(2): 29-52.
23. Weitzman ML (2007) A review of the Stern review on the economics of climate change. J Econ Lit XLV (3): 703-724.