Making the best of hospital pay for performance

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 366, Issue 17, 2012, Pages 1557-1559

  Ryan, Andrew ^a   Blustein, Jan ^b  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HOSPITAL CARE; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITAL INFECTION; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; MORTALITY; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TREND STUDY;

EID: 84860143564     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1202563     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Medicare program: hospital inpatient value-based purchasing program: final rule. Fed Regist 2011;76:26490-547.
2. Lindenauer PK, Remus D, Roman S, et al. Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. N Engl J Med 2007;356:486-96. (Pubitemid 46193076)
3. Epstein AM. Pay for performance at the tipping point. N Engl J Med 2007;356:515-7. (Pubitemid 46193082)
4. Glickman SW, Ou FS, DeLong ER, et al. Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 2007;297:2373-80. (Pubitemid 46883750)
5. Ryan AM, Blustein J, Casalino LP. Medicare's flagship test of pay-for-performance did not spur more rapid quality improvement among low-performing hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31:797-805.