Development of a problematic mobile phone use scale for Turkish adolescents

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 205-211

  Güzeller, Cem Oktay ^a   Coşguner, Tolga ^b  

^a University of Mediterranean   (Turkey)

^b PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD BEHAVIOR; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONELINESS; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; CELLULAR PHONE; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONELINESS; MALE; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TURKEY;

EID: 84860134403     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0210     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Kranzler HR, Li TK. What is addiction? Alcohol Research and Health 2008; 31:93-95.
2. Young K. Addictive use of the internet: a case study that breaks the stereotype. Psychological Reports 1996; 79:899-892.
3. Griffiths MD, Davies MNO. (2005) Video-game addiction: does it exist? In Goldstein J, Raessens J, eds. Handbook of computer game studies. Boston: MIT Press, pp. 359-368.
4. Widyanto L, McMurran M. The psychometric properties of the Internet addiction test. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2004; 7:443-450.
5. Beard KW, Wolf EM. Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2001; 4:377-383.
6. Chak K, Leung L. Shyness and locus of control as predictors of internet addiction and internet use. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2004; 7:559-570.
7. Griffiths M. Does Internet and computer "addiction" exist? some case study evidence. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2000; 3:211-218.
8. Leung L. Net-Generation attributes and seductive properties of the internet as predictors of online activities and internet addiction. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2004; 7:333-348.
9. Young KS. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology and Behavior 1998; 1:237-244.
10. Griffiths MD, Hunt N. Dependence on computer games by adolescents. Psychological Reports 1998; 82:475-480.
11. Bianchi A, Phillips JG. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2005; 8:39-51.
12. Brickfield CF. (1984) Attitudes and perceptions of older people. In Robinson PK, Birren JE, eds. Aging and technological advances. New York: Plenum, pp. 31-38.
13. Charness N, Bosman EA. (1992) Human factors and age. In Craik FIM, Salthouse TA, eds. The handbook of aging and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 495-551.
14. Zulkefly SN, Baharudin R. Mobile phone use amongst students in a university in Malaysia: its correlates and relation to psychological health. European Journal of Scientific Research 2009; 37:206-218.
15. Leung L. Linking psychological attributes to addiction and improper use of the mobile phone among adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Children and Media 2008; 2:93-113.
16. Choliz M. Mobile phone addiction: A point of issue. Addiction 2010; 105:373-375.
17. Leung L. (2008) Leisure boredom, sensation seeking, selfesteem, addiction symptoms and patterns of mobile phone use. In Korini E, Utz S, Tanis M, eds. Mediated interpersonal communication. New York: Routledge, pp. 271-290.
18. Takao M, Takahashi S, Kitamura M. Addictive personality and problematic mobile phone use. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2009; 12:501-507.
19. James D, Drennan J. (2005) Exploring addictive consumption of mobile phone technology. Paper presented at the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, Perth, Australia.
20. Koo HY. Development of a cell phone addiction scale for Korean adolescents. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2009; 39:818-828.
21. Park W. Mobile phone addiction. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2005; 31:253-272.
22. Rutland JB, Sheets T, Young T. Development of a scale to measure problem use of short message service: the SMS Problem Use Diagnostic Questionnaire. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2007; 10:841-843.
23. Davis RA, Flett GL, Besser A. Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic Internet use: implications for preemployment screening. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2002; 5:331-345.
24. Viney LL, Westbrook MT, Preston C. Sources of anxiety in drug addiction. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1985; 41:124-129.
25. Özcan NK, Buzlu S. Internet use and its relation with the psychosocial situation for a sample of university students. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2007; 10:767-772.
26. Chen YF. Social phenomena of mobile phone use: an exploratory study in Taiwanese college students social phenomena of mobile phone use. Journal of Cyber Culture and Information Society 2006; 11:219-244.
27. Myers WA. Addictive sexual behavior. Journal of American Psychoanalysis Association 1994; 42:1159-1182.
28. Walsh SP, White KM, Cox S, et al. Keeping in constant touch: the predictors of young Australians' mobile phone involvement. Computers in Human Behavior 2011; 27:33-47.
29. Billieux JL, Linden MVD, Rochat L. The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2008; 22:1195-1210.
30. Whiteside SP, Lynam DR. The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences 2001; 30:669-689.
31. Gable GG. Integrating case study and survey research methods: an example in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 1994; 3:112-126.
32. DeVellis RF. (2003) Scale development: theory and applications. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
33. Tavsxancil E. (2006) Attitude measurement and its SPSS data analysis. 3rd ed. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
34. TezbasxaranAA. (1997) Guide to likert style scale development. 2nd ed. Ankara: Turkish Psychologists Association Publications.
35. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 1961; 4:53-63.
36. Savasir I, Sahin NH. (1997) The Assessment in cognitivebehavioral therapy: commonly used scales. Ankara: Turkish Psychologist Association Press.
37. Hisli N. Reliability and validity of Beck depression Inventory in Turkish University Students. Journal of Psychology 1989; 23:3-13.
38. Özcan NK, Buzlu S. An assistive tool in determining problematic internet use: validity and reliability of the "online cognition scale" in a sample of university students. Journal of Dependence 2005; 6:19-26.
39. Russell D, Peplau L, Cutrona C. The revised UCLA loneliness scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980; 39:472-480.
40. Demir A. UCLA Loneliness scale validity and reliability. Journal of Psychology 2004; 23:14-19.
41. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. (2004) LISREL 8.7 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
42. Kline RB. (1998) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 1st ed. New York: Guilford Press.
43. Muthén B, Kaplan DA. Comparison of methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 1985; 38:171-189.
44. Tabachnick BG, Fidell IS. (2001) Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
45. Kline P. (1994) An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
46. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, et al. (1998) Multivariate data analysis. NJ: Pearson Education.
47. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. (1994) Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
48. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. (1996) A beginner's guide to Structural Equation Modeling. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Timm NH. (2002) Applied multivariate analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
50. Byrne BM. (1989) A primer of LJSREL: basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
51. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 1988; 103:411-423.
52. Sumer N. Structural equation modeling: basic concepts and practices. Turkish Psychological Writings 2000; 3:49-74.
53. Marsh HW, Hocevar D. A new, more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses: application of secondorder confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 1988; 73:107-117.
54. Kline RB. Latent variable path analysis in clinical research: a beginner's tour guide. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1991; 47:471-484.
55. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999; 6:1-55.
56. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 1981; 18:39-50.
57. Chau PYK. Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach. Decision Sciences 1997; 28:309-334.
58. Nunnally JC. (1978) Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
59. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluations of the Structural Equation Model. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1988; 16:74-91.
60. Cohen J. (1988) Statistical power analysis of the behavioral science. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.
61. Stevens J. (1996) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62. Büyüköztürk S. (2007) Handbook for social science data analysis. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
63. Hinkin TR. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods 1998; 1:104-121.
64. Koivusilta LK, Lintonen TP, Rimpela AH. Orientation in adolescent use of information and communication technology: a digital divide by sociodemographic background, educational career, and health. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2007; 35:95-103.
65. Ha JH, Chin B, Park DH, et al. Characteristics of excessive cellular phone use in Korean students. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2008; 11:783-784.
66. Sanchez-Martinez M, Otero A. Factors associated with cell phone use in adolescents in the community of Madrid (Spain). CyberPsychology and Behavior 2009; 12:131-137.
67. Augner C, Hacker, GH. Associations between problematic mobile phone use and psychological parameters in young adults. International Journal of Public Health 2011; 19:115-117.