Allelopathic effect of salix caprea litter on late successional plants at different substrates of post-mining sites: Pot experiment studies

Botany

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 311-318

  Mudrák, Ondřej ^a,b   Frouz, Jan ^c,d  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

^c CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^d INSTITUTE OF SOIL BIOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Allelopathy; Litter; Restoration; Salix caprea; Succession; Vegetation

Indexed keywords

ABANDONED MINE; ALLELOPATHY; BIOASSAY; DECIDUOUS TREE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GERMINATION; GROWTH RESPONSE; LEACHATE; LITTER; PHYTOMASS; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SANDY SOIL; SUBSTRATE; SUCCESSION;

CZECH REPUBLIC; KARLOVARSKY; SOKOLOV;

ARRHENATHERUM ELATIUS; LOTUS CORNICULATUS; PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA; SALIX; SALIX CAPREA;

EID: 84860130401     PISSN: 19162804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B2012-005     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bradshaw, A. 1997. Restoration of mined lands- using natural processes. Ecol. Eng. 8(4): 255-269. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(97)00022-0.
2. Bradshaw, A., and Hüttl, R.F. 2001. Future minesite restoration involves a broader approach. Ecol. Eng. 17(2-3): 87-90. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00149-X.
3. Brady, N.C., and Weil, R.R. 1998. The nature and properties of soils. 12th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
4. Chapin, S., Walker, L.R., Fastie, C.L., and Sharman, L.C. 1994. Mechanisms of primary succession following deglaciation at Glacier Bay Alaska. Ecol. Monogr. 64(2): 149-175. doi:10.2307/2937039.
5. Connell, J.H., and Slatyer, R.O. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am. Nat. 111(982): 1119-1144. doi:10.1086/283241.
6. Curry, J.P., and Schmidt, O. 2007. The feeding ecology of earthworms-a review. Pedobiologia (Jena), 50(6): 463-477.doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2006.09.001.
7. Del Moral, R., and Cates, R.G. 1971. Allelopathic potential of the dominant vegetation of western Washington. Ecology, 52(6): 1030-1037. doi:10.2307/1933809
8. Fernandez, C., Lelong, B., Vila, B., Mévy, J.P., Robles, C., Greff, S., Dupouyet, S., and Bousquet-Mélou, A. 2006. Potential allelopathic effect of Pinus halepensis in the secondary succession: an experimental approach. Chemoecology, 16(2): 97-105. doi:10.1007/s00049-006-0334-z.
9. Frouz, J. 2008. The effect of litter type and macrofauna community on litter decomposition and organic matter accumulation in postmining sites. Biologia, 63(2): 249-253. doi:10.2478/s11756-008-0031-1.
10. Frouz, J., Elhottová, D., Kuráž, V., and Šourková, M. 2006. Effects of soil macro fauna on other soil biota and soil formation in reclaimed and unreclaimed post mining sites: results of a field microcosm experiment. Appl. Soil Ecol. 33(3): 308-320. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.11.001.
11. Frouz, J., Elhottová, J., Pižl, V., Tajovský, K., Šourková, M., Picek, T., and Malý, S. 2007. The effect of litter quality and soil faunal composition on organic matter dynamics in post-mining soil: alaboratory study. Appl. Soil Ecol. 37(1-2): 72-80.doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.04.001.
12. Frouz, J., Prach, K., Pižl, V., Háněl, L., Starý, J., Tajovský, K., Materna, J., Balík, V., Kalčík, J., and Řehounková, K. 2008. Interactions between soil development, vegetation and soil fauna during spontaneous succession in post mining sites. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 44(1): 109-121. doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.09.002.
13. Hallgren, P., Ikonen, A., Hjältén, J., and Roininen, H. 2003. Inheritance patterns of phenolics in F1, F2, and back-cross hybrids of willows: implications for herbivore responses to hybrid plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 29(5): 1143-1158. doi:10.1023/A:1023829506473.PMID:12857027.
14. Huang, P.M., Wang, T.S.C., Wang, M.K., Wu, M.H., and Hsu, N.W. 1977. Retention of phenolic acids by noncrystalline hydroxyaluminium and hydroxy-iron compounds and clay-minerals of soils. Soil Sci. 123(4): 213-219. doi:10.1097/00010694-197704000-00001.
15. Ikonen, A., Tahvanainen, J., and Roininen, H. 2002. Phenolic secondary compounds as determinants of the host plant preferencesof the leaf beetle, Agelastica alni. Chemoecology, 12(3): 125-131. doi:10.1007/s00012-002-8337-2.
16. Inderjit. 1996. Plant phenolics in allelopathy. Bot. Rev. 62(2): 186-202. doi:10.1007/BF02857921.
17. Inderjit., and Dakshini, K.M.M. 1995. On laboratory bioassays in allelopathy. Bot. Rev. 61(1): 28-44. doi:10.1007/BF02897150.
18. Jackson, J.R., and Willemsen, R.W. 1976. Allelopathy in the first stages of secondary succession on the Piedmont of New Jersey. Am. J. Bot. 63(7): 1015-1023. doi:10.2307/2441761.
19. Jumpponen, A., Mattson, K., Trappe, J.M., and Ohtonen, R. 1998. Effects of established willows on primary succession on Lyman Glacier Forefront, North Cascade Range, Washington, U.S.A.: Evidence for simultaneous canopy inhibition and soil facilitation. Arct. Alp. Res. 30(1): 31-39. doi:10.2307/1551743.
20. Kubát, K., Hrouda, L., Chrtek, J., Jr., Kaplan, Z., Kirschner, J., and Štěpánek, J. (Editors). 2002. Key to the flora of the Czech Republic. Academia, Praha.
21. Lavelle, P., and Spain, A.V. 2001. Soil ecology. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.
22. Lodhi, M.A.K. 1978. Effects of decaying litter of dominant trees and their associated soil in a lowland forest community. Am. J. Bot. 65(3): 340-344. doi:10.2307/2442275.
23. Mallik, A.U. 2003. Conifer regeneration problems in boreal and temperate forests with ericaceous understory: role of disturbance, seedbed limitation, and keytsone species change. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 22(3-4): 341-366. doi:10.1080/713610860.
24. McEwan, R.W., Arthur-Paratley, L.G., Rieske, L.K., and Arthur, M. A. 2010. A multi-assay comparison of seed germination inhibition by Lonicera maackii and co-occurring native shrubs. Flora, 205 (7): 475-483. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2009.12.031.
25. McPherson, J.K., and Thompson, G.L. 1972. Competitive and allelopathic suppression of understory by Oklahoma oak forests. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 99(6): 293-300. doi:10.2307/2997071.
26. Moohammadnor, M., Tursun, X., Qiong Ling, M., Sultan, A., and Eshbakova, K.A. 2010. Flavonoids from Salix caprea. Chem. Nat. Compd. 46(5): 799-800. doi:10.1007/s10600-010-9747-6.
27. Mudrák, O., Frouz, J., and Velichova, V. 2010. Understory vegetation in reclaimed and unreclaimed post-mining forest stands. Ecol. Eng. 36(6): 783-790. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.02.003.
28. Muller, C.H. 1966. Role of chemical inhibition (allelopathy) in vegetational composition. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 93(5): 332-351.doi:10.2307/2483447.
29. Nasudari, A.A., Kompantsev, V.A., Oganesyan, É.T., and Shinkarenko, A.L. 1972. Luteolin 7-glocoside from the leaves of Salix caprea. Khim. Prirod. Soedin. 3: 392-393.
30. Pickett, S.T.A., Collins, S.L., and Armesto, J.J. 1987. Models, mechanisms and pathways of succession. Bot. Rev. 53(3): 335-371. doi:10.1007/BF02858321.
31. Pietrzykowski, M. 2008. Soil and plant communities development and ecological effectiveness of reclamation on a sand mine cast. J. For. Sci. 54(12): 554-565.
32. Prach, K., and Hobbs, R.J. 2008. Spontaneous succession versus technical reclamation in the restoration of disturbed sites. Restor. Ecol. 16(3): 363-366. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00412.x.
33. Prach, K., and Pyšek, P. 2001. Using spontaneous succession for restoration of human-disturbed habitats: Experience from Central Europe. Ecol. Eng. 17(1): 55-62. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00132-4.
34. Prach, K., Pyšek, P., Šmilauer, P., Pysek, P., and Smilauer, P. 1993. On the rate of succession. Oikos, 66(2): 343-346. doi:10.2307/3544823.
35. Rebele, F., and Lehmann, C. 2001. Biological flora of Central Europe: Calamagrostis epigejos (L.) Roth. Flora, 196(5): 325-344.
36. Rice, E.L. 1974. Allelopathy. Academic Press, New York.
37. Rice, E.L. 1979. Allelopathy-an update. Bot. Rev. 45(1): 15-109.doi:10.1007/BF02869951.
38. Rojík, P. 2004. New stratigraphic subdivision of the tertiary in Sokolov Basin in northwestern Bohemia. J. Czech Geol. Soc. 49(3-4): 173-186.
39. Roubíčková, A., Mudrák, O., and Frouz, J. 2009. Effect of earthworm on growth of late succession plant species in postmining sites under laboratory and field conditions. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 45(7): 769-774. doi:10.1007/s00374-009-0386-7.
40. Sagareishvili, T.G., Alaniya, M.D., and Kemertelidze, É.P. 1990. Phenolic compounds in the leaves of S. caprea. Khim. Prirod. Soedin. 1: 119-120.
41. Schütt, P., and Blaschke, H. 1980. Seasonal changes in the allelopathic effect of Salix caprea foliage. Flora, 169(4): 316-328.
42. Šmilauerová, M., and Šmilauer, P. 2002. Morphological responses of plant roots to heterogeneity of soil resources. New Phytol. 154(3): 703-715. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00416.x.
43. Šmilauerová, M., and Šmilauer, P. 2007. What youngsters say about adults: seedling roots reflect clonal traits of adult plants. J. Ecol. 95(3): 406-413. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01218.x.
44. StatSoft, Inc. 2002. STATISTICA for Windows (Computer program manual). Version 6.1. Available at: http://www.statsoft.com
45. Stowe, L.G. 1979. Allelopathy and its influence on the distribution of plants in an Illinois old-field. J. Ecol. 67(3): 1065-1085. doi:10.2307/2259228.
46. Sydes, C., and Grime, J.P. 1981. Effects of the tree leaf litter on herbaceous vegetation in deciduous woodland. 1. Field investigations. J. Ecol. 69(1): 237-248. doi:10.2307/2259828.
47. Vyvyan, J.R. 2002. Allelochemicals as leads for new herbicides and agrochemicals. Tetrahedron, 58(9): 1631-1646. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00052-2.
48. Wallstedt, A., Gallet, C., and Nilsson, M.C. 2005. Behaviour and recovery of the secondary metabolite batatasin-III from boreal forest humus: influence of temperature, humus type and microbial community. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 33(4): 385-407. doi:10.1016/j.bse.2004.08.007.