Replication in aquatic biology: The result is often pseudoreplication

Aquatic Toxicology

Volumn 116-117, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Nikinmaa, M ^a   Celander, M ^b   Tjeerdema, R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FIELD EXPERIMENT; LIFE HISTORY; MARINE BIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPLICATION STUDY; VEGETATION; WATER AVAILABILITY; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

ANIMALS; HYDROBIOLOGY; RESEARCH; WATER;

EID: 84860006914     PISSN: 0166445X     EISSN: 18791514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-445X(12)00141-5     Document Type: Editorial

References (3)

1. Hurlbert, S.H., 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54, 187-211.
2. Niyogi, S., Wood, C.M., 2004. Biotic ligand model, a flexible tool for developing site-specific water quality guidelines for metals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 6177-6192.
3. Oikari, A., Kukkonen, J., Virtanen, V., 1992. Acute toxicity of chemicals to Daphnia magna in humic waters. Sci. Total Environ. 117/118, 367-377.