Pancreas size and volume on computed tomography in normal adults

Pancreas

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 589-595

  Syed, Abdul Bari ^a   Mahal, Ravinder S ^a   Schumm, L Philip ^b   Dachman, Abraham H ^c  

^a University of Chicago ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

computed tomography; morphometry; normal pancreas; pancreas measurement; pancreas volume

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC SIZE; PANCREATIC VOLUME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORGAN SIZE; PANCREAS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 84859988860     PISSN: 08853177     EISSN: 15364828     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318237457f     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kreel L, Haertel M, Katz D. Computed tomography of the normal pancreas. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1977;1:290-299.
2. Kolmannskog F, Larsen S, Swensen T, et al. Reproducibility and observer variation at computed tomography and ultrasound of the normal pancreas. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1983;24:21-25.
3. Matsumoto S, Mori H, Miyake H, et al. Uneven fatty replacement of the pancreas: evaluation with CT. Radiology. 1995;194:453-458.
4. Sheedy PF, Stephens DH, Hattery RR, et al. Computed tomography of the pancreas. Radiol Clin North Am. 1977;15:349-366. (Pubitemid 8272876)
5. Sheedy PF, Stephens DH, Hattery RR, et al. Computed tomography in the evaluation of patients with suspected carcinoma of the pancreas. Radiology. 1977;124:731-737. (Pubitemid 8168727)
6. Soyer P, Spelle L, Pelage J, et al. Cystic fibrosis in adolescents and adults: fatty replacement of the pancreasVCTevaluation and functional correlation. Radiology. 1999;210:611-615. (Pubitemid 29124017)
7. Alzaid A, Aideyan O, Nawaz S. The size of the pancreas in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Medicine. 1993;10:759-763. (Pubitemid 23306900)
8. Furukawa H, Takayasu K, Mukai K, et al. Computed tomography of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: comparison of tumor size measured by dynamic computed tomography and histopathologic examination. Pancreas. 1996;13(3):231-235. (Pubitemid 26317990)
9. Brodey PA. Attenuation differences between tumor and surrounding normal pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:1410. (Pubitemid 29494033)
10. Haaga JR, Alfidi RJ, Zeich MG, et al. Computed tomography of the pancreas. Radiology. 1976;120:589-595.
11. Haaga JR, Alfidi RJ. Computed tomographic scanning in the pancreas. Radiol Clin North Am. 1977;15:367-376.
12. Haaga JR, Alfidi RJ, Havrilla RR, et al. Definitive role of CT scanning of the pancreas. Radiology. 1977;124:723-730.
13. Heuck A, Maubach PA, Reiser M, et al. Age-related morphology of the normal pancreas on computed tomography. Gastrointest Radiol. 1987;12:18-22. (Pubitemid 17029403)
14. Weisberg S. Applied Linear Regression. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1985.
15. Royall RM. Model robust confidence intervals using maximum likelihood estimators. Int Stat Rev. 1986;54:221-226.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between 2 methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476): 307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
17. StataCorp. Stata: Release 11. Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2009.
18. Dachman AH, MacEneaney PM, Adedipe A, et al. Tumor size on computed tomography scans: is one measurement enough? Cancer. 2001;91:555-560. (Pubitemid 32105701)
19. Geraghty EM, Boone JM, McGahan JP, et al. Normal organ volume assessment from abdominal CT. Abdom Imaging. 2004;29:482-490. (Pubitemid 38868788)
20. Breiman RS, Beck JW, Korobkin M, et al. Volume determination using computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982;138:329-333. (Pubitemid 12163142)
21. Staron RB, Ford E. Computed tomographic volumetric calculation reproducibility. Invest Radiol. 1986;21:272-274. (Pubitemid 16133583)
22. Van Hoe L, Van Cutsem E, Vergote I, et al. Size quantification of liver metastases in patients undergoing cancer treatment: reproducibility of one-, two-, and three-dimensional measurements determined with spiral CT. Radiology. 1997;202:671-675. (Pubitemid 27093435)
23. Wheatley JM, Rosenfield NS, Heller G, et al. Validation of a technique of computer-aided tumor volume determination. J Surg Res. 1995;59:621-626. (Pubitemid 26013880)
24. Hopper KD, Kasales CJ, Eggi KD, et al. The impact of 2D versus 3D quantification of tumor bulk determination on current methods of assessing response to treatment. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20:930-937. (Pubitemid 26392557)
25. James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M, et al. Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:523-528. (Pubitemid 29157060)
26. Dawson LA, Faffray DA. Advance in image-guided radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2997;25:938-946.
27. Dryzmala RD, Mohan R, Brewster L, et al. Dose-volume histograms. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Physics. 1991;21:71-78.
28. Siegel MJ, Martin KW, Worthington JL. Normal and abnormal pancreas in children: US studies. Radiology. 1987;165:15-18. (Pubitemid 17146972)
29. Siegel MJ. Pediatric Body CT. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999:263.
30. Ueda D. Sonographic measurement of the pancreas in children. J Clin Ultrasound. 1989;17:417-423. (Pubitemid 20019389)