Exploring the role of robots in home organization

HRI'12 - Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 327-334

  Pantofaru, Caroline ^a   Takayama, Leila ^a   Foote, Tully ^a   Soto, Bianca ^a  

^a Willow Garage Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

home organization; home robots; need finding; robot design

Indexed keywords

DESIGN IMPLICATIONS; FAMILY DYNAMICS; HOME LIFE; HOME ROBOT; NEED FINDING; ROBOT DESIGNS; ROBOT PROTOTYPES; TECHNICAL CHALLENGES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 84859985340     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2157689.2157805     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. R. Baumeister, E. Bratslavsky, M. Muraven, and D. Tice. Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74:1252-1265, 1998. (Pubitemid 128656642)
2. S. Beckman and M. Barry. Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedded Design Thinking. California Management Review, 50(1):25-56, 2007.
3. A. Brush, B. Lee, R. Mahajan, S. Agarwal, S. Saroiu, and C. Dixon. Home automation in the wild: Challenges and opportunities. In CHI, 2011.
4. V. Bush. As we may think. Atlantic Monthly, 176(1):101-108, 1945.
5. D. P. Crowne and D. Marlowe. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24:349-354, 1960.
6. S. Danzigera, J. Levavb, and L. Avnaim-Pessoa. Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(17):6889-92, 2011.
7. M. Fellman. Breaking Tradition. Marketing Research, 1:20-25, 1999.
8. J. Forlizzi and C. DiSalvo. Service robots in the domestic environment: A study of the roomba vacuum in the home. In Proc. HRI, 2006.
9. R. O. Frost and R. C. Gross. The hoarding of possessions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31(4):367-381, 1993.
10. B. Gates. A robot in every home. Scientific American, pages 58-65, 2007.
11. C. Geertz. From the Native's Point of View: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding. Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion, 1984.
12. R. Kaufman and F. W. English. Needs Assessment: Concept and Application. Educational Technology Publications, 1979.
13. S. Kriz, T. Ferro, P. Damera, and J. Porter. Fictional Robots as a Data Source in HRI Research: Exploring the Link between Science Fiction and Interactional Expectations. In ROMAN, 2010.
14. T. W. Malone. How do people organize their desks? implications for the design of office information systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 1:99-112, 1983.
15. NAPO. National Association of Professional Organizers. www.napo.net.
16. J. Nielsen. First rule of usability: Don't listen to users. www.useit.com/alertbox/20010805.html, 2001.
17. D. Pangercic and M. Beetz. TUM james goes shopping. www.youtube.com/user/ iasTUMUNICH#p/a/ u/2/JS2zycc4AUE, 2011.
18. A. Romney, S. Weller, and W. Batchelder. Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88(2), 1986.
19. B. Schwartz. The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. Ecco, 2004.
20. M. Scopelliti, M. V. Giuliani, and F. Fornara. Robots in a domestic setting: A psychological approach. Univ Access Inf Soc, 4:146-155, 2005. (Pubitemid 43118502)
21. A. Sellen and R. Harper. The Myth of the Paperless Office. MIT Press, 2002.
22. Steelcase Inc. Six patterns of work. http: //www.steelcase.com/en/ Resources/overview/ Documents/six%20patterns%20of%20work.pdf, 2006.
23. J. Sung, R. E. Grinter, and H. I. Christensen. Domestic robot ecology. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2:417-429, 2010.
24. S. C. Weller. Cultural consensus theory: Applications and frequently asked questions. Field Methods, 4:339-368, 2007.