Electrocardiogram quality classification based on robust best subsets linear prediction error

Computing in Cardiology

Volumn 38, Issue , 2011, Pages 365-368

  Noponen, Kai ^a   Karsikas, Mari ^a   Tiinanen, Suvi ^a   Kortelainen, Jukka ^a   Huikuri, Heikki ^a   Seppanen, Tapio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE INFORMATION; BAND PASS; COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM (ECG); ESSENTIAL SPECTRUM; EXHAUSTIVE SEARCH; INTERFERENCE REMOVAL; LINEAR PREDICTION; NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE; OBSERVED DATA; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; QUALITY CLASSIFICATION; QUALITY DATA; ROBUST METHODS; TEST DATA; TRAINING DATA;

CARDIOLOGY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FORECASTING;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84859984357     PISSN: 23258861     EISSN: 2325887X     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. García-Niebla, J, Llontop-García P, Valle-Racero JI, Serra- Autonell G, Batchvarov VN, De Luna, AB. Technical Mistakes during the Acquisition of the Electrocardiogram. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2009;14(4):389-403.
2. Kligfield P, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, Childers R, Deal BJ, Hancock EW, et al. Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part I: The Electrocardiogram and Its Technology A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:1109-27. (Pubitemid 46350900)
3. Pahlm O, Hammill SC. Quality improvement in electrocardiogram recording and interpretation [editorial]. J Electrocard 2008;41(5):367-9.
4. Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Glass L, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov PCh, Mark RG, et al. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals. Circ J 2000;101(23): e215-20.
5. PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2011 [Internet; Updated 2011 Aug 17; cited 2011 Sep 8]. Available from: http://physionet.org/challenge/2011/.
6. Malmivuo J, Plonsey R. Bioelectromagnetism . Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
7. John F. Applied regression analysis, linear models, and related models. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage, 1997:405-11.
8. Redmond SJ, Lovell NH, Basilakis J, Celler BG. ECG quality measures in telecare monitoring. In: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008. Vancouver (Canada): IEEE, 2008:2869-72.
9. Vaglio M, Isola L, Gates G, Badilini F. Use of ECG Quality Metrics in Clinical Trials. Computing in Cardiology 2010;37:505-8.