Patient and public involvement in developing patient-reported outcome measures: Indispensable, desirable, challenging

Patient

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 75-77

  Groene, Oliver ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Outcome assessment (health care); Patient care; Patient preference

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84859983895     PISSN: 11781653     EISSN: 11781661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/11597370-000000000-00000     Document Type: Note

References (12)

1. Staniszewska S, Haywood KL, Brett J, et al. Patient and public involvement in patient-reported outcome measures: evolution not revolution. Patient 2012; 5 (2): 79-87
2. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. 3rd edition. New York (NY): Oxford University Press, 2003
3. Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B, et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (5): e22
4. World Health Organization. Patients for patient safety - statement of case: how patient engagement became a priority. Geneva: WHO, 2011 [online]. Available from URL: http:// www.who.int/patientsafety/patients-for-patient/ statement/ en/index.html [Accessed 2011 Sep 1]
5. Conway J. Patients and families: powerful new partners for healthcare and caregivers. Healthc Exec 2008; 23: 60-2
6. Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, et al. Not all patients want to participate in decision making: a national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20: 531-5 (Pubitemid 41003809)
7. Institute for Family-Centered Care. Developing and sustaining a patient and family advisory council. Washington, DC: IFCC, 2009
8. Hildon ZH, Allwood D, Black N. Impact of format and content of visual display of data on comprehension, choice and preference: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2012; 24 (1): 55-64
9. Peters E, Hibbard J, Slovic P, et al. Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007; 26: 741-8
10. Marcus EN. The silent epidemic: the health effects of illiteracy. New Engl J Med 2006; 355: 339-41 (Pubitemid 44127536)
11. Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making 2001; 21: 37-44 (Pubitemid 32245029)
12. Sunstein CR, Thaler RH. Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. U Chicago Law Rev 2003; 70: 1159-202 (Pubitemid 38148396)