Designing family-centered male circumcision services: A conjoint analysis approach

Patient

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 101-111

  Bridges, John F P ^a   Searle, Sarah C ^a   Selck, Frederic W ^a   Martinson, Neil A ^b,c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; Circumcision; HIV infections; Patient preference

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CIRCUMCISION; COMMUNITY CARE; DATA ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH SURVEY; HIV TEST; HUMAN; INFECTION RATE; MALE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK; SOUTH AFRICA; WAITING ROOM;

ADULT; CIRCUMCISION, MALE; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; FAMILY; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SOUTH AFRICA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859962990     PISSN: 11781653     EISSN: 11781661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/11592970-000000000-00000     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, et al. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med 2005; 2 (11): e298
2. Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2007; 369 (9562): 643-56 (Pubitemid 46281312)
3. Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomized trial. Lancet 2007; 369 (9562): 657-66
4. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Safe, voluntary, informed male circumcision and comprehensive HIV prevention programming: guidance for decision-makers on human rights, ethical and legal considerations. Geneva: WHO, 2008
5. World Health Organization and Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Male circumcision for HIV prevention: research implications for policy and programming. WHO/UNAIDS technical consultation, 6-8 March 2007. Conclusions and recommendations (excerpts). Reprod Health Matters 2007; 15 (29): 11-4
6. National Department of Health. NDOH annual report 2008/09: the Government Communication and Information System (GCIS). Pretoria: National Department of Health, 2009 [online]. Available from URL: publications/ndoh-annual-report- 200809 [Accessed 2012 Mar 5]
7. Varga CA. Sexual decision-making and negotiation in the midst of AIDS: youth in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Health Transition Review 1997; 7 (Suppl. 3): 45-67
8. Campbell C, Foulis CA, Maimane S, et al. The impact of social environments on the effectiveness of youth HIV prevention: a South African case study. AIDS Care 2005; 17 (4): 471-8 (Pubitemid 40663207)
9. Paruk Z, Petersen I, Bhana A, et al. Containment and contagion: how to strengthen families to support youth HIV prevention in South Africa. African J AIDS Res 2005; 4 (1): 57-63 (Pubitemid 41645303)
10. Binner SL, Mastrobattista JM, Day MC, et al. Effect of parental education on decision-making about neonatal circumcision. South Med J 2002; 95 (4): 457-61 (Pubitemid 34286746)
11. Westercamp N, Bailey RC. Acceptability of male circumcision for prevention of HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review. AIDS Behav 2007; 11 (3): 341-55 (Pubitemid 46570814)
12. Madhivanan P, Krupp K, Chandrasekaran V, et al. Acceptability of male circumcision among mothers with male children in Mysore, India. AIDS 2008; 22 (8): 983-8 (Pubitemid 351652249)
13. Bridges J, Selck F, Gray G, et al. Condom avoidance and determinants of demand for male circumcision in Johannesburg, SouthAfrica.Health Policy Plan 2011; 26 (4): 298-306
14. Godlonton S, Munthali A, Thornton R. Male circumcision in Malawi: new data on behavior and attitudes [working paper]. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan, 2010
15. Bridges J, Searle S, Selck F, et al. Engaging families in the design of social marketing strategies for male circumcision services in Johannesburg, South Africa. Soc Mar Q 2010; 16 (3): 60-76
16. Bridges J, Hanson R, Little M, et al. Ethical relationships in paediatric emergency medicine: moving beyond the dyad. Emerg Med 2001; 13 (3): 344-50 (Pubitemid 32905779)
17. Yeh M, Weis JR. Why are we here at the clinic? Parent-child (dis)agreement on referral problems at outpatient treatment entry. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001; 69 (6): 1018-102
18. Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2003; 2 (1): 55-64
19. Bridges J, Kinter E, Kidane L, et al. Things are looking up since we started listening to patients: trends in the application of conjoint analysis in health 1982-2007. Patient 2008; 1 (4): 273-82
20. Marshall D, Bridges J, Hauber AB, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health - how are studies being designed and reported? An update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. Patient 2010; 3 (4): 249-56
21. Akkazieva B, Gulacsi L, Brandtmuller A, et al. Patients preferences for healthcare system reforms in Hungary: a conjoint analysis. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2006; 5 (3): 189-98 (Pubitemid 46998490)
22. Opuni M, Bishai D, Gray GE, et al. Preferences for characteristics of antiretroviral therapy provision in Johannesburg, South Africa: results of a conjoint analysis. AIDS Behav 2010; 14 (4): 807-15
23. Ryan M, McIntosh E, Shackley P. Using conjoint analysis to elicit the views of health service users: an application to the patient health card. Health Expect 1998; 1 (2): 117-29
24. Bridges JF. Stated preference methods in health care evaluation: an emerging methodological paradigm in health economics. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2003; 2 (4): 213-24
25. Orme BK. Getting started with conjoint analysis. Madison (WI): Research Publishers LLC, 2006
26. Shisana O, Rehle T, Simbayi LC, et al. South African national HIV prevalence, incidence, behaviour and communication survey, 2008.Cape Town:Human SciencesResearch Council Press, 2009
27. Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretive phenomenological analysis: theory, method, and research. London: Sage, 2009
28. Eaton L, Kalichman SC. Behavioral aspects of male circumcision for the prevention of HIV infection. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2009; 6 (4): 187-93
29. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV AIDS UNAIDS Male circumcision & HIV prevention in Eastern & Southern Africa: communications guidance. Geneva: UNAIDS, 2008
30. Lukobo MD, Bailey RC. Acceptability of male circumcision for prevention of HIV infection in Zambia. AIDS Care 2007; 19 (4): 471-7 (Pubitemid 46598743)
31. Scott BE, Weiss HA, Viljoen JI. The acceptability of male circumcision as an HIV intervention among a rural Zulu population, Kwazulu-natal, South Africa. AIDS Care 2005; 17 (3): 304-13 (Pubitemid 40188912)
32. Shisana O, Simbayi L. Nelson Mandela HSRC study of HIV/AIDS: full report of South African national HIV prevalence, behavioural risks and mass media. Household survey 2002. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council Press, 2002