Let's not argue about semantics

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 2835-2840

  Bos, Johan ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOLD; MODEL CHECKING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

ANNOTATION SCHEME; BLACK BOX METHOD; EXPRESSIVE POWER; FIRST-ORDER LANGUAGE; REPRESENTATION LANGUAGES; SEMANTIC COMPONENTS; SPECIFIC SEMANTICS; TEXTUAL ENTAILMENT;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84859956504     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. James Allen. 1995. Natural Language Understanding. Benjamin/Cummings, 2nd edition.
2. Collin F. Baker, Charles J. Fillmore, and John B. Lowe. 1998. The Berkeley FrameNet project. In 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Proceedings of the Conference, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
3. Roy Bar-Haim, Ido Dagan, Bill Dolan, Lisa Ferro, and Danilo Giampiccolo. 2006. The second pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, Venice, Italy.
4. Patrick Blackburn and Johan Bos. 2005. Representation and Inference for Natural Language. A First Course in Computational Semantics. CSLI.
5. Johan Bos, Stephen Clark, Mark Steedman, James R. Curran, and Julia Hockenmaier. 2004. Wide-Coverage Semantic Representations from a CCG Parser. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'04), Geneva, Switzerland.
6. Johan Bos. 2005. Towards wide-coverage semantic interpretation. In Proceedings of Sixth International Workshop on Computational Semantics IWCS-6, pages 42-53.
7. Harry Bunt. 2007. The semantics of semantic annotation. In Proceedings of PACLIC-21, the 21st Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pages 13-28, Seoul, Korea.
8. Eugene Charniak. 1972. Towards a Model of Children's Story Comprehension. Ph. D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
9. Robin Cooper, Dick Crouch, Jan Van Eijck, Chris Fox, Josef Van Genabith, Jan Jaspars, Hans Kamp, Manfed Pinkal, David Milward, Massimo Poesio, and Steve Pulman. 1996. Using the Framework. Technical report, FraCaS: A Framework for Computational Semantics. FraCaS deliverable D16.
10. Ann Copestake, Dan Flickinger, Ivan Sag, and Carl Pollard. 2005. Minimal recursion semantics: An introduction. Journal of Research on Language and Computation, 3(2-3):281-332.
11. Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, and Bernardo Magnini. 2006. The pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 3944, pages 177-190.
12. Rodolfo Delmonte. 2006. Venses-A linguistically-based system for semantic evaluation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 3944, pages 344-371.
13. David Dowty. 1989. On the semantic content of the notion thematic role. In Properties, Types, and Meanings, volume 2. Kluwer.
14. Hans Kamp and Uwe Reyle. 1993. From Discourse to Logic; An Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and DRT. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
15. Paul Kingsbury and Martha Palmer. 2002. From treebank to propbank. In Proceedings of the 3rd LREC, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain.
16. Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
17. Michael Minock. 2005. A phrasal approach to natural language access over relational databases. In Proc. of Applications of Natural Language to Data Bases (NLDB), pages 333-336, Alicante, Spain.
18. Dan I. Moldovan, Christine Clark, Sanda M. Harabagiu, and Daniel Hodges. 2007. Cogex: A semantically and contextually enriched logic prover for question answering. Journal of Applied Logic, 5(1):49-69.
19. Terence Parsons. 1980. Modifiers and quantifiers in natural language. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 6:29-60.
20. James Pustejovsky, José Castano, Robert Ingria, Roser Saurí, Rob Gaizauskas, Andrea Setzer, and Graham Katz. 2003. TimeML: Robust specification of event and temporal expressions in text. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS-5), Tilburg, January.
21. Manabu Sato, Daisuke Bekki, Yusuke Miyao, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2006. Translating hpsg-style outputs of a robust parser into typed dynamic logic. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Main conference poster sessions, pages 707-714, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
22. Michael Schiehlen. 1999. Semantikkonstruktion. Ph. D. thesis, Universität Stuttgart.
23. Satoshi Sekine, Kentaro Inui, Ido Dagan, Bill Dolan, Danilo Giampiccolo, and Bernardo Magnini, editors. 2007. Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing. Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, June.
24. Lappoon R. Tang and Raymond J. Mooney. 2000. Automated construction of database interfaces: Integrating statistical and relational learning for semantic parsing. In Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora, pages 133-141, Hong Kong.
25. Terry Winograd. 1971. Procedures as a Representation for Data in a Computer Program for Understanding Natural Language. Ph. D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
26. Annie Zaenen, Lauri Karttunen, and Richard Crouch. 2005. Local textual inference: Can it be defined or circumscribed? In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, pages 31-36, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.