Should we be "Nudging" for cadaveric organ donations?

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 46-48

  Hansen, Pelle Guldborg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CADAVER; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; HUMAN; NOTE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; TRANSPLANTATION;

CADAVER; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT;

EID: 84859936578     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634950     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Kurtz, S. F. and Saks, M. J. 1996. The transplant paradox: Overwhelming public support for organ donation vs. under-supply of organs: The Iowa Organ Procurement Study. Journal of Corporation Law, 21: 767-806.
2. Samuelson, W. and Zeckhauser, R. J. 1988. Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, I: 7-59.
3. Saunders, J. 2009. Bodies, organs and saving lives: Old respects and new dilemmas. Clinical Medicine, 9(6): 549-552.
4. Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5. Whyte, K. P., Selinger, E., Caplan, A. L. and Sadowski, J. 2012. Nudge, nudge or shove, shove-The right way for nudges to increase the supply of donated cadaver organs. American Journal of Bioethics, 12(2): 32-39.