Prediction of prognosis after radical cystectomy for pathologic node-negative bladder cancer

International Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1059-1065

  Park, Eun ^a   Ha, Hong Koo ^b   Chung, Moon Kee ^b  

^a Wallace Memorial Baptist Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Pusan National University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bladder cancer; Invasion; Lymph node; Prognosis; Survival

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BLADDER CANCER; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER INVASION; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LYMPH VESSEL METASTASIS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGY; PELVIS LYMPH NODE; PREDICTION; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; ARTICLE; BLADDER TUMOR; BLOOD VESSEL; CANCER GRADING; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPH VESSEL; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE CANCER; PELVIS; PERIPHERAL NERVE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD VESSELS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CYSTECTOMY; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; LYMPHATIC VESSELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEOPLASMS, MULTIPLE PRIMARY; PELVIS; PERIPHERAL NERVES; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84859931926     PISSN: 03011623     EISSN: 15732584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-011-9920-2     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al (2008) Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58:71-96
2. Dalbagni G, Genega E, Hashibe M et al (2001) Cystectomy for bladder cancer: a contemporary series. J Urol 165: 1111-1116
3. Takahashi A, Tsukamoto T, Tobisu K et al (2004) Radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: results of multi-institutional pooled analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:14-19
4. Bassi P, Ferrante GD, Piazza N et al (1999) Prognostic factors of outcome after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a retrospective study of a homogeneous patient cohort. J Urol 161:1494-1497
5. Cheng L, Weaver AL, Leibovich BC et al (2000) Pre-dicting the survival of bladder carcinoma patients treated with radical cystectomy. Cancer 88:2326-2332
6. Horikawa Y, Kumazawa T, Narita S et al (2007) Lym-phatic invasion is a prognostic factor for bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 12:131-136
7. Hugen CM, Polcari AJ, Fitzgerald MP et al (2010) Risk factors for recurrence following radical cystectomy for pathologic node negative bladder cancer. J Surg Oncol 15(102):334-337
8. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia
9. Resorlu B, Beduk Y, Baltaci S et al (2009) The prognostic significance of advanced age in patients with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. BJU Int 103:480-483
10. Takashi M, Murase T, Mizuno S et al (1987) Multivariate evaluation of prognostic determinants in bladder cancer patients. Urol Int 42:368-374
11. Thrasher JB, Frazier HA, Robertson JE et al (1994) Clin-ical variables which serve as predictors of cancer-specific survival among patients treated with radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and prostate. Cancer 73:1708-1715
12. Lipponen PK, Eskelinen MJ, Kiviranta J et al (1991) Prognosis of transitional cell bladder cancer: a multivariate prognostic score for improved prediction. J Urol 146: 1535-1540
13. Skinner EC, Lieskovsky G, Skinner DG (1984) Radical cystectomy in the elderly patient. J Urol 131:1065-1068
14. Raitanen MP, Nieminen P, Tammela TL (1995) Impact of tumour grade, stage, number and size, and smoking and sex, on survival in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Urol 76:470-474
15. Pollack A, Zagars GK, Dinney CP et al (1994) Preopera-tive radiotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. Long term follow-up and prognostic factors for 338 patients. Cancer 74:2819-2827
16. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R et al (2001) Radical cys-tectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 19:666-675
17. Honma I, Masumori N, Sato E et al (2006) Removal of more lymph nodes may provide better outcome, as well as more accurate pathologic findings, in patients with bladder cancer-analysis of role of pelvic lymph node dissection. Urology 68:543-548
18. Herr HW (2003) Extent of surgery and pathology evalua-tion has an impact on bladder cancer outcomes after radical cystectomy. Urology 61:105-108
19. Herr HW, Bochner BH, Dalbagni G et al (2002) Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 167:1295-1298
20. Leissner J, Ghoneim MA, Abol-Enein H et al (2004) Extended radical lymphadenectomy in patients with uro-thelial bladder cancer: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol 171:139-144
21. Dotan ZA, Kavanagh K, Yossepowitch O et al (2007) Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and cancer specific survival. J Urol 178:2308-2312; discussion 2313
22. Hong SK, Kwak C, Jeon HG et al (2005) Do vascular, lymphatic, and perineural invasion have prognostic impli-cations for bladder cancer after radical cystectomy? Urol-ogy 65:697-702
23. Nangia AK, Konety BR, Wachtel S et al (1997) Perineural invasion in transitional cell carcinoma and the effect on prognosis following radical cystectomy. Urology 49:968-972
24. Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA et al (2009) Perineural invasion in cancer: areview of the literature. Cancer 115:3379-3391
25. Jaeger TM, Weidner N, Chew K et al (1995) Tumor angiogenesis correlates with lymph node metastases in invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 154:69-71
26. Heney NM, Proppe K, Prout GR Jr et al (1983) Invasive bladder cancer: tumor configuration, lymphatic invasion and survival. J Urol 130:895-897