Linking the actors and policies throughout the disaster management cycle by "agreement on Objectives" - A new output-oriented management approach

Natural Hazards and Earth System Science

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1085-1107

  Greiving, S ^a   Pratzler Wanczura, S ^b   Sapountzaki, K ^c   Ferri, F ^d   Grifoni, P ^d   Firus, K ^e   Xanthopoulos, G ^f  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Institute for Fire Service and Rescue Technologies   (Germany)

^c HAROKOPIO UNIVERSITY   (Greece)

^d Istituto Di Ricerche Sulla Popolazione E Le Politiche Sociali Rome   (Italy)

^e T6 Ecosystems Srl   (Italy)

^f Institute of Mediterranean Forest Ecosystems and Forest   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER;

ATTICA; DORTMUND; GERMANY; GREECE; ITALY; LAZIO; NORTH RHINE-WESTPHALIA;

EID: 84859923681     PISSN: 15618633     EISSN: 16849981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-12-1085-2012     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Armaş, J. and Avram, E.: Perception of flood risk in Danube Delta, Romania, Nat. Hazards, 50, 269-287, 2009.
2. Audit Commission: Management Paper On Target: the practice of performance indicators, London, 2000.
3. Blake, B., Thompson, B., Polk, W., Johnson, J., Duckworth, B., and Bevers, S.: S.W.O.T. Analysis-Identifying Your Strenghts, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats, Texas, available at: http://ttap.tamu.edu/ Curriculum/F.20SWOT20Anlaysis.pdf (last access: 22 February 2010), 2005.
4. Bundesministerium des Innern (BMI): Nationale Strategie zum Schutz Kritischer Infrastrukturen (KRITIS-Strategie), available at: http://www.bmi.bund.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/544770/publicationFile/27031/ kritis.pdf (last access: 15 July 2011), 2009.
5. Cools, M., Fürst, D., and Gnest, H.: Parametrische Steuerung-Op-erationalisierte Zielvorgaben als neuer Steuerungsmodus in der Raumplanung, Frankfurt a.M., 2003.
6. De Roo, G.: Environmental planning in the Netherlands-To good to be true: from command and control planning to shared governance, Hampshire, 2003.
7. European Commission: Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions-Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection Com (2006) 231 final, 2006.
8. European Commission: Territorial Agenda of the European Union, Brussels, 2007.
9. European Communities: Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks, Brussels, 2007.
10. European Communities: A Community approach on the prevention of natural and man-made disasters, Brussels, 23 Feb 2009, COM(2009) 82 final, 2009.
11. Eurostat: Regions in the European Union-Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics, NUTS 2006 /EU-27, available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa. eu/cache/ITY OFFPUB/KS-RA-07-020/EN/KS-RA-07-020-EN.PDF (last access: 18 June 2011), 2007.
12. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., and Combs, B.: How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits, Policy Sci., 8, 127-152, 1978.
13. Greiving, S.: Report on Goverscience seminar on inclusive risk governance, Brussels, 2009a.
14. Greiving, S.: Zielvereinbarungen-ein neuer Ansatz zum Management von Hochwasserrisiken; Paper linked to the BMBF research project: Changes and management of risks of extreme flood events in large river basins-the example of the Elbe River, project website available at: http://www.veris-elbe.ioer. de/, 2009b.
15. Greiving, S., Fleischhauer, M., and Wanczura, S.: Management of Natural Hazards in Europe: The Role of Spatial Planning in Selected EU Member States, J. Environ. Plann. Man., 49, 739-757, 2006. (Pubitemid 44445309)
16. Grünewald, U.: Gutachten zur Entstehung und Verlauf des ex-tremen Niederschlag-Abfluss-Ereignisses am 26.07.2008 im Stadtgebiet von Dortmund-einschließlich der Untersuchung der Funktionsfähigkeit von wasserwirtschaftlichen Anlagen und Einrichtungen der Stadt, Emschergenossenschaft und Dritter in den Gebieten Dortmund-Marten, -Dorstfeld und -Schönau, Gutachten im Auftrag der Stadt Dortmund und der Em-schergenossenschaft, 2009.
17. Haering, B., Gsponer, G., and Koch, P.: Effor2 Konzeptbericht- Wirkungsorientierte Subventionspolitik im Rahmen des Waldge-setzes; Umweltmaterialien Nr. 145, Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft, Zurich, 2002.
18. IRGC: International Risk Governance Council, White paper on risk governance: Towards an integrative approach, Geneva, 2005.
19. IRGC: International Risk Governance Council: Risk Governance Deficits-An analysis and illustration of the most common deficits in risk governance, Geneva, 2009.
20. Johnson, D. B.: Public Choice-An introduction to the new political economy, California, 1991.
21. Kaoukis, C.: Forest Fires in Greece, period 1991-2004: Lessons from the evolution of the phenomenon, MSc thesis, Harokopion University of Athens, Greece, 2009 (in Greek).
22. Knill, C. and Lenschow, A.: On deficient implementation and deficient theories: the need for an institutional perspective in implementation research, in: Implementing EU environmental policy, New directions and old problems, edited by: Knill, C. and Lenschow, A., Manchester/New York, 2000, 9-35, 2000.
23. Krems, B.: Online-Verwaltungslexikon olev.de-Definitionen und Kurzerläuterungen; available at: www.olev.de (last access: 11 November 2010), 2007.
24. Lane, J. E.: New Public Management, Routledge, London, 2000.
25. Löfstedt, R.: Risk management in post-trust societies, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York, 2005.
26. Meadowcroft, J.: Politics and scale: some implications for environmental governance, Landscape Urban Plan., 61, 169-179, 2002.
27. Neary, P. J.: Of hype and hyperbolas: Introducing the New Economic Geography, J. Econ. Lit., 39, 536-561, 2001.
28. Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. A.: Reinvesting Government-How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector, Reading, 1992.
29. Paddison, R.: City Marketing, Image Reconstruction and Urban Regeneration, Urban Stud, March 1993, 30, 339-349, 1993.
30. Recklies, D.: SWOT (-Analysis); available at: http://www. themanager.org/models/SWOT.htm (last access: 22 February 2010), 2005.
31. Sapountzaki, K., Wanczura, S., Casertano, G., Greiving, S., Xan-thopoulos, G., and Ferrera, F.: Disconnected policies and actors and the missing role of spatial planning throughout the risk management cycle, Nat. Hazards, 59, 1445-1474, doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9843-3, 2011.
32. Shavelson, R. J., McDonnell, L., and Oakes, J.: Steps in designing an indicator system, Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2, available at: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2{\&} n=12 (last access: 18 June 2010), 1991.
33. Slovic, P.: Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield, Risk Anal., 19, 689-701, 1999.
34. Stadt Dortmund: Statistikatlas 2007-Dortmunder Stadtteile, Dortmund, available at: http://dev.statistik.dortmund.de/upload/binarydata-do4ud4cms/25/ 07/14/00/00/00/140725/statistikatlas. pdf (last access: 18 June 2010), 2007.
35. van Asselt, M.: The complex significance of uncertainty in a risk era: logics, manners and strategies in use, in: Risk Assessment and Management 2/3/4, 125-158,2005.
36. Wanczura, S.: Raumplanung und "Risk Governance"-Indikatoren- system zur Messung einer effektiven und effizienten Koordina-tion im "Risk Governance" Prozess, Dissertation, Dortmund, 2010.
37. Wanczura, S., Fleischhauer, M., Greiving, S., Fourman, M., Sucker, K., and D'Andrea, A.: Analysis of recent EU, international and national research and policy activities in the field of risk governance, Del. 1.1 MIDIR Project, 2007.
38. UN-ISDR: Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015-Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters; Extract from the final report of the World Conference on Disaster Reduction (A/CONF.206/6), available at: http://www.unisdr.org/files/1037-hyogoframeworkforactionenglish.pdf, 2005.
39. UN-ISDR: Indicators of Progress: Guidance on Measuring the Reduction of Disaster Risks and the Implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action, http://www.unisdr.org/files/2259- IndicatorsofProgressHFAannexes.pdf, 2007.
40. UN-ISDR: Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction, available at: http://www.unisdr.org/eng/terminology/terminology-2009- eng. html, 2009.
41. USAID Center for Development Information and Evaluation: Selecting performance indicators, Washington; available at: http://pdfusaid.gov/pdf-docs/ PNABY214.pdf (last access: 20 april 2010), 1996.
42. Xanthopoulos, G., Xanthakis, M., and Vonitsanos, C: Forest cover evolution in Attica and assessment of desertification trends resulting from human activities, grazing and fires, 75-91, in: Proceedings of the DeSurvey Project Workshop "Understanding, Assessing and Monitoring Desertification", edited by: Xanthopoulos, G., 19 May, 2010, Athens, Greece, Institute of Mediterranean Forest Ecosystems and Forest Products Technology, Athens, Greece, 91 pp., 2010 (in Greek).
43. Young, O. R.: The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change, Fit, Interplay, and Scale, Cambridge, Mass., London, 2002.