Aggregation with strong regularities and alternatives

Proceedings of the International Natural Language Generation Conference, INLG 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages

  Horacek, Helmut ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

'CURRENT; AGGREGATION TECHNIQUES; DEGREE OF CONDENSATION; FORMAL SYSTEMS; LOCAL OPTIMIZATIONS; OPTIMIZATION MEASURES; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; PROBLEM SPECIFICATION; REGULAR VARIATIONS; STRONG REGULARITIES;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84859914143     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Busemann, S. 1996. Best-First Generation. In Proc. of the 8th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pp. 101-110, Hearstmonceaux, UK.
2. Busemann, S. and Horacek, H. 1998. A Flexible Shallow Approach to Text Geneartion. In Proc. of the 9th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pp. 238-247, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Canada.
3. Dalianis, H. 1999. Aggregation in Natural Language Generation. Computational Intelligence 15(4).
4. Dalianis, H.; and Hovy, E. 1996. Aggregation in Natural Language Generation. In G. Adorni, M. Zock (eds.), Trends in Natural Language Generation – An Artificial Intelligence Perspective, pp. 88-105, Springer.
5. Horacek, H. 1992. An Integrated View of Text Planning. In R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Rösner, O. Stock (eds.), Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation, pp. 29-44, Springer.
6. Horacek, H. 2002. Presenting Sets of Problem Solutions Concisely. Submitted.
7. Horacek, H.; and Konrad, K. 1999. Presenting Herbrand Models with Linguistically Motivated Techniques. In Proc. of CIMCA-99, Vienna, Austria.
8. Konrad, K.; and Wolfram, D. 1999. System Description: Kimba, A Model Generator for Many-Valued First-Order Logics. In Proc. of the 16th International Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE-16), pp. 282-286 Trento, Italy.
9. Mann, B.; and Moore, J. 1980. Computer as Author – Results and Prospects. Research Report ISI/RR-79-82, University of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey.
10. Mann, B.; and Moore, J. 1981. Computer Generation of Multiparagraph English Text. American Journal of Computational Linguistics 8(2), pp. 17-29.
11. Reape, M.; and Mellish, C. 1999. What is Aggregation Anyhow? In Proc. of 7th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pp. 20-29, Toulouse, France.
12. Robin, J. 1995. Revision-Based Generation of Natural Language Summaries Providing Historical Background. PhD thesis, Columbia University.
13. Scott, D.; and de Souza C. 1990. Getting the Message Across in RST-Based Text Generation. In R. Dale, C. Mellish, M. Zock (eds.), Current Research in Natural Language Generation, pp. 47-73, Academic Press, New York.
14. Shaw, J. 1998a. Segregatory Coordination and Ellipsis in Text Generation. In Proc. of the 36th Association for Computational Linguistics and the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 1220-1226, Montreal, Canada.
15. Shaw, J. 1998b. Clause Aggregation Using Linguistic Knowledge. In Proc. of the 9th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pp. 18-147, Niagara-on-the-lake, Canada.