메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 2356-2361

Automatic learning and evaluation of user-centered objective functions for dialogue system optimisation

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUALITY ASSURANCE; SPEECH PROCESSING;

EID: 84859906764     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper
Times cited : (21)

References (19)
  • 1
    • 1842653460 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cambridge University Press
    • Herbert Clark. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
    • (1996) Using Language
    • Clark, H.1
  • 2
    • 48249144508 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Pragmatic usage of linear regression models for the predictions of user judegments
    • Klaus-Peter Engelbrecht and Sebastian Möller. 2007. Pragmatic usage of linear regression models for the predictions of user judegments. In Proc. of SIGdial.
    • (2007) Proc. of SIGdial
    • Engelbrecht, K.-P.1    Möller, S.2
  • 3
  • 4
    • 35348896707 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Context & usability testing: User-modeled information presentation in easy and difficult driving condition
    • Jiang Hu, Andi Winterboer, Clifford Nass, Johanna D. Moore, and Rebecca Illowsky. 2007. Context & usability testing: user-modeled information presentation in easy and difficult driving condition. In Proc. CHI, pages 1343-1346.
    • (2007) Proc. CHI , pp. 1343-1346
    • Hu, J.1    Winterboer, A.2    Nass, C.3    Moore, J.D.4    Illowsky, R.5
  • 6
    • 70450139546 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Machine learning for spoken dialogue systems
    • Oliver Lemon and Olivier Pietquin. 2007. Machine learning for spoken dialogue systems. In Proc. of Interspeech.
    • (2007) Proc. of Interspeech
    • Lemon, O.1    Pietquin, O.2
  • 7
    • 79952794258 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reinforcement learning for spoken dialogue systems: Comparing strengths and weaknesses for practical deployment
    • Tim Paek. 2006. Reinforcement learning for spoken dialogue systems: Comparing strengths and weaknesses for practical deployment. In Proc. Dialog-on-Dialog Workshop, Interspeech.
    • (2006) Proc. Dialog-on-dialog Workshop, Interspeech
    • Paek, T.1
  • 9
    • 85037536702 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Invited talk, The Center for Language and Speech Processing, Johns Hopkins University
    • Roberto Pieraccini. 2002. The art and science of spoken dialog systems. Invited talk, The Center for Language and Speech Processing, Johns Hopkins University.
    • (2002) The Art and Science of Spoken Dialog Systems
    • Pieraccini, R.1
  • 10
    • 85037527534 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does this list contain what you were searching for? Learning adaptive dialogue strategies for interactive question answering
    • Verena Rieser and Oliver Lemon. 2008a. Does this list contain what you were searching for? Learning adaptive dialogue strategies for interactive question answering. Natural Language Engineering (to appear).
    • (2008) Natural Language Engineering (to Appear)
    • Rieser, V.1    Lemon, O.2
  • 12
    • 69849106941 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A corpus collection and annotation framework for learning multimodal clarification strategies
    • Verena Rieser, Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová, and Oliver Lemon. 2005. A corpus collection and annotation framework for learning multimodal clarification strategies. In Proc. SIGdial.
    • (2005) Proc. SIGdial
    • Rieser, V.1    Kruijff-Korbayová, I.2    Lemon, O.3
  • 14
    • 0037841376 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Optimizing dialogue management with reinforcement learning: Experiments with the NJ-Fun system
    • Satinder Singh, Diane Litman, Micheal Kearns, and Marilyn Walker. 2002. Optimizing dialogue management with reinforcement learning: Experiments with the NJ-Fun system. JAIR, 16.
    • (2002) JAIR , pp. 16
    • Singh, S.1    Litman, D.2    Kearns, M.3    Walker, M.4
  • 16
    • 0001552955 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • PARADISE: A general framework for evaluating spoken dialogue agents
    • Marilyn Walker, Diane Litman, Candance Kamm, and Alicia Abella. 1997. PARADISE: a general framework for evaluating spoken dialogue agents. In ACL/EACL.
    • (1997) ACL/EACL
    • Walker, M.1    Litman, D.2    Kamm, C.3    Abella, A.4
  • 17
    • 85149111795 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Learning optimal dialogue strategies: A case study of a spoken dialogue agent for email
    • Marilyn Walker, Jeanne Fromer, and Shrikanth Narayanan. 1998. Learning optimal dialogue strategies: A case study of a spoken dialogue agent for email. In Proceedings of ACL/COLING.
    • (1998) Proceedings of ACL/COLING
    • Walker, M.1    Fromer, J.2    Narayanan, S.3
  • 18
    • 84974698591 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Towards developing general models of usability with PARADISE
    • Marilyn Walker, Candance Kamm, and Diane Litman. 2000. Towards developing general models of usability with PARADISE. Natural Language Engineering, 6 (3).
    • (2000) Natural Language Engineering , vol.6 , Issue.3
    • Walker, M.1    Kamm, C.2    Litman, D.3
  • 19
    • 25144463586 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Can we talk? Methods for evaluation and training of spoken dialogue system
    • Marilyn Walker. 2005. Can we talk? Methods for evaluation and training of spoken dialogue system. Language Resources and Evaluation, 39(1):65-75.
    • (2005) Language Resources and Evaluation , vol.39 , Issue.1 , pp. 65-75
    • Walker, M.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.