Biperiden (M 1 antagonist) impairs the expression of cocaine conditioned place preference but potentiates the expression of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 231, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 213-216

  Ramos, Anna C ^a   Andersen, Monica L ^a   Oliveira, Maria G M ^a   Soeiro, Aline C ^a   Galduróz, José C F ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Acetylcholine; Behavioral sensitization; Biperiden; Cocaine; Conditioned place preference

Indexed keywords

BIPERIDEN; COCAINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT ANIMAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SENSITIZATION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; HABITUATION; MALE; MEMORY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHARMACOLOGICAL BLOCKING; PLACE PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIZATION;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BIPERIDEN; COCAINE; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DOPAMINE UPTAKE INHIBITORS; MALE; MICE; MUSCARINIC ANTAGONISTS; RECEPTOR, MUSCARINIC M1;

EID: 84859903741     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.03.030     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Penberthy J.K., Ait-Daoud N., Vaughan M., Fanning T. Review of treatment for cocaine dependence. Current Drug Abuse Reviews 2010, 3:49-62.
2. UNODC. World Drug Report. United Nations Publication Sales No E10XI132010.
3. APA Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 1994, American Psychiatric Association, Washington. 4th ed.
4. Wise R.A., Bozarth M.A. Action of drugs of abuse on brain reward systems: an update with specific attention to opiates. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior 1982, 17:239-243.
5. Heikkila R.E., Orlansky H., Cohen G. Studies on the distinction between uptake inhibition and release of (3H) dopamine in rat brain tissue slices. Biochemical Pharmacology 1975, 24:847-852.
6. Di Chiara G., Imperato A. Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1988, 85:5274-5278.
7. Aosaki T., Miura M., Suzuki T., Nishimura K., Masuda M. Acetylcholine-dopamine balance hypothesis in the striatum: an update. Geriatrics and Gerontology International 2010, 10(Suppl 1):S148-S157.
8. Hikida T., Kaneko S., Isobe T., Kitabatake Y., Watanabe D., Pastan I., et al. Increased sensitivity to cocaine by cholinergic cell ablation in nucleus accumbens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001, 98:13351-13354.
9. Williams M.J., Adinoff B. The role of acetylcholine in cocaine addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008, 33:1779-1797.
10. Fornari R.V., Moreira K.M., Oliveira M.G. Effects of the selective M1 muscarinic receptor antagonist dicyclomine on emotional memory. Learning and Memory 2000, 7:287-292.
11. Kimura Y., Ohue M., Kitaura T., Kihira K. Amnesic effects of the anticholinergic drugs, trihexyphenidyl and biperiden: differences in binding properties to the brain muscarinic receptor. Brain Research 1999, 834:6-12.
12. Roldan G., Bolanos-Badillo E., Gonzalez-Sanchez H., Quirarte G.L., Prado-Alcala R.A. Selective M1 muscarinic receptor antagonists disrupt memory consolidation of inhibitory avoidance in rats. Neuroscience Letters 1997, 230:93-96.
13. Soares J.C., Fornari R.V., Oliveira M.G. Role of muscarinic M1 receptors in inhibitory avoidance and contextual fear conditioning. Neurobiology of learning and memory 2006, 86:188-196.
14. Itzhak Y., Martin J.L. Scopolamine inhibits cocaine-conditioned but not unconditioned stimulant effects in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2000, 152:216-223.
15. Shimosato K., Watanabe S., Kitayama S. Differential effects of trihexyphenidyl on place preference conditioning and locomotor stimulant activity of cocaine and methamphetamine. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology 2001, 364:74-80.
16. Esmaeili B., Basseda Z., Dehpour A.R. Antagonism of muscarinic M1 receptors by dicyclomine inhibits the consolidation of morphine-associated contextual memory. Brain Research Bulletin 2008, 76:380-387.
17. White N.M., Carr G.D. The conditioned place preference is affected by two independent reinforcement processes. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior 1985, 23:37-42.
18. Brabant C., Quertemont E., Tirelli E. Influence of the dose and the number of drug-context pairings on the magnitude and the long-lasting retention of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in C57BL/6J mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2005, 180:33-40.
19. Sakoori K., Murphy N.P. Maintenance of conditioned place preferences and aversion in C57BL6 mice: effects of repeated and drug state testing. Behavioural Brain Research 2005, 160:34-43.
20. Cador M., Bjijou Y., Stinus L. Evidence of a complete independence of the neurobiological substrates for the induction and expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine. Neuroscience 1995, 65:385-395.
21. Vanderschuren L.J., Pierce R.C. Sensitization processes in drug addiction. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences 2010, 3:179-195.
22. Vezina P. D1 dopamine receptor activation is necessary for the induction of sensitization by amphetamine in the ventral tegmental area. Journal of Neuroscience 1996, 16:2411-2420.
23. Parker L.A., McDonald R.V. Reinstatement of both a conditioned place preference and a conditioned place aversion with drug primes. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior 2000, 66:559-561.
24. Robinson T.E. Behavioral sensitization: characterization of enduring changes in rotational behavior produced by intermittent injections of amphetamine in male and female rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1984, 84:466-475.
25. Abrahao K.P., Quadros I.M., Souza-Formigoni M.L. Individual differences to repeated ethanol administration may predict locomotor response to other drugs, and vice versa. Behavioural Brain Research 2009, 197:404-410.
26. Calcagnetti D.J., Keck B.J., Quatrella L.A., Schechter M.D. Blockade of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference: relevance to cocaine abuse therapeutics. Life Sciences 1995, 56:475-483.
27. Blokland A. Acetylcholine: a neurotransmitter for learning and memory. Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews 1995, 21:285-300.
28. Ellis K.A., Nathan P.J. The pharmacology of human working memory. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 2001, 4:299-313.
29. Hasselmo M.E. The role of acetylcholine in learning and memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2006, 16:710-715.
30. Langmead C.J., Watson J., Reavill C. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors as CNS drug targets. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2008, 117:232-243.
31. Forget B., Hamon M., Thiebot M.H. Involvement of alpha1-adrenoceptors in conditioned place preference supported by nicotine in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2009, 205:503-515.
32. Tan H., Liu N., Wilson F.A., Ma Y. Effects of scopolamine on morphine-induced conditioned place preference in mice. Addiction Biology 2007, 12:463-469.
33. Thomsen M., Conn P.J., Lindsley C., Wess J., Boon J.Y., Fulton B.S., et al. Attenuation of cocaine's reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects via muscarinic M1 acetylcholine receptor stimulation. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 2010, 332:959-969.
34. Nobili L., Sannita W.G. Cholinergic modulation, visual function and Alzheimer's dementia. Vision Research 1997, 37:3559-3571.
35. Jeon J., Dencker D., Wortwein G., Woldbye D.P., Cui Y., Davis A.A., et al. A subpopulation of neuronal M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors plays a critical role in modulating dopamine-dependent behaviors. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:2396-2405.
36. Steketee J.D. Neurotransmitter systems of the medial prefrontal cortex: potential role in sensitization to psychostimulants. Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews 2003, 41:203-228.
37. Vanderschuren L.J., Kalivas P.W. Alterations in dopaminergic and glutamatergic transmission in the induction and expression of behavioral sensitization: a critical review of preclinical studies. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2000, 151:99-120.
38. Threlfell S., Clements M.A., Khodai T., Pienaar I.S., Exley R., Wess J., et al. Striatal muscarinic receptors promote activity dependence of dopamine transmission via distinct receptor subtypes on cholinergic interneurons in ventral versus dorsal striatum. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:3398-3408.
39. Dackis C.A., Gold M.S. New concepts in cocaine addiction: the dopamine depletion hypothesis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 1985, 9:469-477.