Non-sentential utterances in dialogue: A corpus-based study

Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2002 Workshop - 3rd Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 15-26

  Fernández, Raquel ^a   Ginzburg, Jonathan ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASED REASONINGS; BRITISH NATIONAL CORPORA; COMPLEX DOMAINS; CORPUS-BASED; DYNAMIC APPROACHES; KEEP TRACK OF;

EID: 84859898888     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. J. Allen and R. Perrault. 1980. Analyzing intention in utterances. Artificial Intelligence, 15:143-178.
2. L. Burnard. 2000. Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (World Edition). Oxford Uni-verstity Computing Services. Accessible from: ftp://sable.ox.ac.uk/pub/ota/BNC/.
3. S. Carberry. 1991. Plan Recognition in Natural Language Dialogue. Bradford Books. MIT Press, Cambridge.
4. J. Carietta. 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: tha kappa statistics. Computational Linguistics, 2(22):249-255.
5. R. Cooper, S. Larsson, J. Hieronymus, S. Ericsson, E. Engdahl, and P. Ljunglof. 2001. GODIS and Questions Under Discussion. In The TRINDI Book. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg. Available from http://www.ling.gu.se/research/projects/trindi.
6. M. Dalrymple, F. Pereira, and S. Shieber. 1991. Ellipsis and higher order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy, (14):399-452.
7. E. Engdahl, S. Larsson, and S. Ericsson. 2000. Focus-ground articulation and parallelism in a dynamic model of dialogue. Technical report, Trindi:Task Oriented Instructional Dialogue. Accessible from: http://www.ling.gu.se/research/projects/trindi.
8. R. Fernandez. 2002. An Implemented HSPG Grammar for SHARDS. Technical Report TR-02-04, Department of Computer Science. King's College London.
9. J. Ginzburg and R. Cooper. 2001a. Clarification, ellipsis, and the nature of contextual updates. Under review for Linguistics and Philosophy.
10. J. Ginzburg and R. Cooper. 2001b. Resolving ellipsis in clarification. In Proceedings of ACL/EACL'01.
11. J. Ginzburg and I. Sag. 2001. Interrogative Investigations. CSLI Publications.
12. J. Ginzburg, H. Gregory, and S. Lappin. 2001. SHARDS: Fragment resolution in dialogue. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Computational Semantics.
13. J. Ginzburg. 1996. Interrogatives: Questions, facts, and dialogue. In Shalom Lappin, editor, Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Blackwell, Oxford.
14. J. Ginzburg. 1997. Structural mismatch in dialogue. In Proceedings of MunDial 97 (Technical Report 97-106), pages 59-80. Universi-taet Muenchen Centrum fuer Informations- und Sprachverarbeitung, Muenchen.
15. J. Ginzburg. 1999. Ellipsis resolution with syntactic presuppositions. In Harry Bunt and Reinhard Muskens, editors, Computing Meaning: Current Issues in Computational Semantics. Kluwer.
16. J. Ginzburg. 2002. A semantics for interaction in dialogue. Forthcoming for CSLI Publications. Draft chapters available from: http://www.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/staff/ginzburg.
17. S. Larson, P. Ljunglof, R. Cooper, E. Engdahl, and S. Ericsson. 2000. GoDiS-an accommodating dialogue system. In Proceedings of ANLP/NAAGL-2000 Workshop on Conversational systems.
18. S. Larsson. 1998. Questions under discussion and dialogue moves. In J. Hulstijn and A. Ni-jholt, editors, Proceedings of TwenDial 98, 13th Twente workshop on Language Technology. Twente University, Twente.
19. M. Purver, J. Ginzburg, and P. Healey. 2001. On the means for clarification in dialogue. Presented at the SIGdial 2001 workshop on discourse and dialogue.
20. M. Purver. 2001. SCoRE: A tool for searching the BNC. Technical Report TR-01-07, Department of Computer Science, King's College London.
21. M. Purver. 2002. Processing Unknown Words in a Dialogue System. In Proceedings of A CL/SIGdial-2002 Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue.