Using readers to identify lexical cohesive structures in texts

ACL-05 - 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 55-60

  Klebanov, Beata Beigman ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEXICAL COHESION; LEXICAL COHESIVE STRUCTURE;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84859894361     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1628960.1628972     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Reem Al-Halimi and Rick Kazman. 1998. Temporal indexing through lexical chaining. In C. Fellbaum, editor, WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, pages 333-351.MIT Press, Cambridge,MA.
2. Regina Barzilay and Michael Elhadad. 1997. Using lexical chains for text summarization. In Proceedings of the ACL Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization Workshop, pages 86-90.
3. Jean Carletta. 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2):249-254.
4. Barbara Di Eugenio andMichaelGlass. 2004. The kappa statistic: a second look. Computational Linguistics, 30(1): 95-101.
5. M.A.K. Halliday and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. Longman Group Ltd.
6. Marti Hearst. 1997. Texttiling: Segmenting text into multi-paragraph subtopic passages. Computational Linguistics, 23(1):33-64. (Pubitemid 127458657)
7. Lynette Hirschman, Patricia Robinson, John D. Burger, and Marc Vilain. 1998. Automating coreference: The role of annotated training data. CoRR, cmplg/9803001.
8. Klaus Krippendorff. 1980. Content Analysis. Sage Publications.
9. Daniel Marcu, Estibaliz Amorrortu, and Magdalena Romera. 1999. Experiments in constructing a corpus of discourse trees. In Proceedings of ACL'99 Workshop on Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging, pages 48-57.
10. Mitchell Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of english: the penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
11. G. Miller. 1990. Wordnet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4):235-312.
12. Ruslan Mitkov, Richard Evans, Constantin Orasan, Catalina Barbu, Lisa Jones, and Violeta Sotirova. 2000. Coreference and anaphora: developing annotating tools, annotated resources and annotation strategies. In Proceedings of the Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium (DAARC'2000), pages 49-58.
13. Dan Moldovan and Adrian Novischi. 2002. Lexical chains for question answering. In Proceedings of COLING 2002.
14. Jane Morris and Graeme Hirst. 2004. Non-classical lexical semantic relations. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL Workshop on Computational Lexical Semantics.
15. Jane Morris and Graeme Hirst. 2005. The subjectivity of lexical cohesion in text. In James C. Chanahan, Yan Qu, and Janyce Wiebe, editors, Computing attitude and affect in text. Springer,Dodrecht, The Netherlands.
16. Massimo Poesio and Renata Vieira. 1998. A corpusbased investigation of definite description use. Computational Linguistics, 24(2):183-216.
17. David E. Rumelhart. 1984. Understanding understanding. In J. Flood, editor, Understanding Reading Comprehension, pages 1-20. Delaware: International Reading Association.
18. Roger Schank and Robert Abelson. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Sidney Siegel and John N. Castellan. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw Hill, Boston, MA.
20. Nicola Stokes, Joe Carthy, and Alan F. Smeaton. 2004. Select: A lexical cohesion based news story segmentation system. Journal of AI Communications, 17(1):3-12.
21. Bonny Webber and Donna Byron, editors. 2004. Proceedings of the ACL-2004Workshop on Discourse Annotation, Barcelona, Spain, July.