An information-state approach to collaborative reference

ACL-05 - 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-4

  DeVault, David ^a   Kariaeva, Natalia ^a   Kothari, Anubha ^a   Oved, Iris ^a   Stone, Matthew ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS; SPEECH PROCESSING;

COLLABORATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING; DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; FLEXIBLE LINKS; INFORMATION STATE; MODULAR ARCHITECTURES; REVERSIBLE PROCESS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84859894252     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1225753.1225754     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. H. H. Clark and D. Wilkes-Gibbs. 1986. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22:1-39.
2. H. H. Clark. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge.
3. R. Dale and E. Reiter. 1995. Computational interpretations of the Gricean maxims in the generation of referring expressions. Cognitive Science, 18:233-263.
4. D. DeVault, C. Rich, and C. L. Sidner. 2004. Natural language generation and discourse context: Computing distractor sets from the focus stack. In FLAIRS.
5. P. Heeman and G. Hirst. 1995. Collaborating on referring expressions. Comp. Ling., 21(3):351-382.
6. S. Larsson and D. Traum. 2000. Information state and dialogue management in the TRINDI dialogue move engine toolkit. Natural Language Eng., 6:323-340.
7. M. Purver. 2004. The Theory and Use of Clarification Requests in Dialogue. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of London.
8. C. Rich, C. L. Sidner, and N. Lesh. 2001. COLLAGEN: applying collaborative discourse theory to human-computer interaction. AI Magazine, 22:15-25. (Pubitemid 34069152)
9. M. Stone, C. Doran, B.Webber, T. Bleam, and M. Palmer. 2003. Microplanning with communicative intentions. Comp. Intelligence, 19(4):311-381.
10. M. Stone. 2004a. Communicative intentions and conversational processes. In J. Trueswell and M. K. Tanenhaus, editors, Approaches to Studying World-Situated Language Use, pages 39-70. MIT.
11. M. Stone. 2004b. Intention, interpretation and the computational structure of language. Cognitive Science, 28(5):781-809. (Pubitemid 40272589)