Evaluation of online partner notification services like inspot requires starting with the client, not the clinic

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 348-

  Hottes, Travis S ^a   Gilbert, Mark ^a  

^a BRITISH COLUMBIA CENTRE FOR DISEASE CONTROL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH SERVICE; HETEROSEXUALITY; HUMAN; INFECTION PREVENTION; INTERNET; LETTER; MALE HOMOSEXUAL; PARTNER NOTIFICATION SERVICE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE;

CONTACT TRACING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SEXUAL PARTNERS; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES;

EID: 84859886845     PISSN: 01485717     EISSN: 15374521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31824c0e77     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Rietmeijer CA, Westergaard B, Mickiewicz TA, et al. Evaluation of an online partner notification program. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38:359-364.
2. Kerani RP, Fleming M, DeYoung B, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of inSPOT and patient-delivered partner therapy for gonorrhea and chlamydial infection among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38:941-946.
3. Vest JR, Valadez AM, Hanner A, et al. Using e-mail to notify pseudonymous e-mail sexual partners. Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34:840-845. (Pubitemid 350287496)
4. Mohammed H, Leichliter JS, Schmidt N, et al. Does patient-delivered partner treatment improve disclosure for treatable sexually transmitted diseases? AIDS Patient Care STDs 2010; 24:183-188.