Safety implications of infotainment system use in naturalistic driving

Work

Volumn 41, Issue SUPPL.1, 2012, Pages 4200-4204

  Perez, Miguel A ^a  

^a VIRGINIA TECH TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Driver Distraction; Event Detection; Eye Glance; Infotainment System; Radio

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; CAR DRIVING; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MASS MEDIUM; SAFETY; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ATTENTION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; BEHAVIOR; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MASS MEDIA; SAFETY;

EID: 84859869187     PISSN: 10519815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0122-4200     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Angell, L., et al., Driver workload metrics. Task 2 final report, 2006, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Washington, D.C.
2. Angell, L.S., Conceptualizing effects of secondary task demands on event detection during driving: Surrogate methods and issues, in Performance metrics for assessing driver distraction: The quest for improved road safety, G.L. Rupp, Editor 2010, SAE International: Warrendale, PA. p. 42-71.
3. Curry, D.G. and T. Jaworski. Frequency of use of automotive stereo controls. in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting. 1998. Chicago, IL: The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, California.
4. Dingus, T.A., et al., The 100 car naturalistic driving study, phase II - Results of the 100 car field experiment, 2006, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Washington, D.C.
5. Dingus, T.A., et al., The development of a naturalistic data collection system to perform critical incident analysis: An investigation of safety and fatigue issues in long-haul trucking. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2006. 38(6): p. 1127-1136.
6. Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group, Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication systems, 2006, Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers: Washington, D.C. p. 90.
7. Greenberg, J., et al., Driver distraction: Evaluation with event detection paradigm. Transportation Research Record, 2003. 1843: p. 1-9.
8. Klauer, S.G., et al., The impact of driver inattention on nearcrash/ crash risk: An analysis using the 100-Car naturalistic driving study data, 2006, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Washington, D.C. p. 224.
9. Klauer, S.G., et al., An analysis of driver inattention using a case-crossover approach on 100-Car data: Final report, 2010, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Washington, D.C. p. 148.
10. Nes, F.L.v. and J.P.M.v. Itegem, Hidden functionality: How an advanced car radio is really used, 1990, Institute for Perception Research: Eindhoven, The Netherlands. p. 101-112.
11. Neurauter, M.L., J.M. Hankey, and R.A. Young. Radio usage: Observations from the 100-Car naturalistic driving study; SAE Technical Paper No. 2007-01-0441. in SAE 2007 World Congress. 2007. Detroit, MI: Society of Automotive Engineers.
12. Reyes, M.L. and J.D. Lee, Effects of cognitive load presence and duration on driver eye movements and event detection performance. Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2008. 11: p. 391-402.
13. Rupp, G.L., 4th international driver metrics workshop: Summary and next steps, in Performance metrics for assessing driver distraction: The quest for improved road safety, G.L. Rupp, Editor 2010, SAE International: Warrendale, PA. p. 254-263.