Recognizing nurse stakeholder dissonance as a critical determinant of patient safety in new healthcare information technologies

Work

Volumn 41, Issue SUPPL.1, 2012, Pages 1904-1910

  Samaras, Elizabeth A ^a   Real, Sara D ^a   Curtis, Amber M ^a   Meunier, Tessa S ^a  

^a Malik and Seeme Hasan School of Business   (United States)

Author keywords

'case studies'; 'human factors'; CPOE; EMR

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOENGINEERING; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING STAFF; PATIENT SAFETY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL ORDER ENTRY SYSTEMS; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PATIENT SAFETY; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859858022     PISSN: 10519815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0406-1904     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Localio AR, Kimmel SE, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005; 293 (10):1197-1203.
2. Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra RH, Guappone K, Carpenter JD, Seshadri V. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2007 June; 76 supplement 1:S21-S27.
3. Bernstam EV, Hersh WR, Sim I, Eichmann D, Silverstein JC, Smith JW, et al. Unintended consequences of health information technology: A need for biomedical informatics. JBI. 2010, Oct; 43 (5): 828-830.
4. Weiner JP, Kfuri T, Chan K and Fowles JB. "e-Iatrogenesis": the most critical unintended consequence of CPOE and other HIT. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007; 14: 387-388 as cited by Bernstam, et al., 2010
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources Services Administration. Initial Findings from the 2008 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses.2010.Available from: http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/ rnsurveys/rnsurveyinitial2008.pdf
6. Samaras EA, Samaras GM. Using Human-Centered Systems Engineering to Reduce Nurse Stakeholder Dissonance. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology. 2010 Nov; 44(s1):25-32.
7. Samaras GM, Samaras EA. Feasibility of an e-health initiative: Information NWDs of cancer survivor stakeholders. Proceedings of International Ergonomics Association World Congress; 2009: Beijing, China: International Ergonomics Association.
8. Samaras EA. A concept analysis of stakeholder dissonance and implications for nursing practice. Unpublished. 2011.
9. Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for theory construction in nursing. 5th ed. Boston: Prentice Hall; 2011.
10. Festinger, L, Riecken, HW, Schachter S. When prophecy fails. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1954
11. Freeman, RE. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman; 1984
12. as cited by Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review.1997; 22(4):853. Available from EBSCOhost.
13. American Nurses Association. Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. 2004. Available from http://www.nursingworld.org/codeofethics.
14. American Nurses Association. Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice. 2004. Silver Spring, MD: Author.
15. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: A new heath system for the 21st century. 2001. Available from http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php? record-id=10027.
16. Institute of Medicine. Health Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality. 2003. Available from: http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2003/Health-Professions- Education-A-Bridge-to-Quality.aspx
17. Samaras, GM. Human-centered systems engineering: Managing dissonance in healthcare delivery. In Kolker A, Story P, editors. Management engineering for effective healthcare delivery: Principles and practices. Philadelphia: IGI Global; 2011. 148-171.