Behavioral compliance in virtual reality: Effects of warning type

Advances in Cognitive Ergonomics

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 812-821

  Duarte, Emília ^a   Rebelo, F ^b   Teles, Júlia ^b   Wogalter, Michael S ^c  

^a UNIDCOM IADE   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral compliance; Safety warnings and signs; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ERGONOMICS; PHYSICAL THERAPY;

BEHAVIORAL COMPLIANCE; DYNAMIC CONDITION; SECURITY CHECKS; UNIVERSITY STUDENTS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 84859850187     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. American National Standards Institute (2002). Z535. Accredited Standards Committee on Safety Signs and Colors. Z535.1-5, National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rossyln, VA.
2. Glover, B.L., & Wogalter, M.S. (1997). Using a computer simulated world to study behavioral compliance with warnings: Effects of salience and gender, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting (pp. 1283-1287). Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
3. International Organization for Standardization (2001). Graphical Symbols -Part 1: Test Methods for Judged Comprehensibility and for Comprehension, ISO 9186:2001. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
4. International Organization for Standardization (2002). Graphical Symbols - Safety Colors and Safety Signs. Part J: Design Principles for safety Signs in Workplaces and Public Areas, ISO 3864-1. Gencve, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
5. Ishihara, S. (1988). Test for Colour-Blindness (38 ed.). Tokyo: Kanehara & Co., Ltd.
6. Lehto, M.R., & Miller, I.M. (1986). Warnings: Volume I. Fundamentals, design and evaluation methodologies. Ann Arbor, MI: Fuller Technical.
7. Mayhorn, C.B., & Wogalter, M.S. (2003). Technology-based warnings: Improvising safety through increased cognitive support to users, 15th International Ergonomics Association Congress (Vol. 4, pp. 504-507).
8. Rogers, W.A., Lamson, N., & Rousseau, G.K. (2000). Warning research: An integrative perspective. Human Factors, 42(1), 102-139.
9. Sanders, M.S., & McCormick, E.J. (1993). Human factors in engineering and design (7th ed.). New York: MacGraw-Hill.
10. Shih, N.-J., Lin, C.-Y., & Yang, C.-H. (2000). A virtual-reality-based feasibility study of evacuation time compared to the traditional calculation method. Fire Safety Journal, 34(4), 3 77-391.
11. Smith-Jackson, T.L., & Wogalter, M.S. (2004). Potential uses of technology to communicate risk in manutacturing. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 14(1), 1-14.
12. Tang, C.-H., Wu, W.-T., & Lin, C.-Y. (2009). Using virtual reality to dctern1inc how emergency signs facilitate way-finding. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 722-730.
13. Wogalter, M.S. (2006). Communication- Human Information Processing (C-HIP) Model. In M.S. Wogalter (Ed.), Handbook of warnings (pp. 51-62): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Wogalter, M.S., & Conzola, V.C. (2002). Using technology to facilitate the design and delivery of warnings. International Journal of Systems Science. 33(6), 461-466.
15. Wogalter, M.S., DeJoy, D.M., & Laughery, K.R. (1999). Organizing framework: A consolidated communication-human information processing (C-HIP) model. In M.S. Wogalter, D.M. DeJoy & K.R. Laughery (Eds.), Warnings and Risk Communication (pp. I5-24). London: Taylor & Francis.
16. Wogalter, M.S., Kalsher, M.J., & Racicot, B.M. (1993). Behavioral compliance with warnings: Effects of voice, context, and location. Safety Science, 16(5-6), 637-654.
17. Wogalter, M.S., & Mayhorn, C.B. (2005). Providing cognitive support with technology-based warning systems. Ergonomics. 48(5), 522-533.
18. Wogalter, M.S., & Young, S.L. (1991). Behavioural compliance to voice and print warnings. Ergonomics. 34(1), 79- 89.