Stakeholder theory

Business Ethics and Continental Philosophy

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 37-60

  Bevan, David ^a   Werhane, Patricia ^b  

^a Grenoble Graduate Business School ^*

^b GRENOBLE ECOLE DE MANAGEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859847702     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013338.004     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. R. E. Freeman, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman (1984), 6.
2. R. E. Freeman, J. S. Harrison, A. C. Wicks, B. L. Parmar, and S. De Colle, Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2010).
3. A. Smith, The Wealth of Nations. R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press (1776; 1976)
4. A. A. Berle, Jr. And G. Means, The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan (1932).
5. M. Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (1962), 74.
6. S. London, ‘The long view: Interview with Milton man’, Financial Times, Weekend Magazine, 7 June 2003.
7. J. D. Harris andR. E. Freeman, ‘The impossibility of the separation thesis’, Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (4) (2008), 541-8
8. R. E. Freeman, ‘The politics of stakeholder theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (1994), 409-21;
9. N. Bowie, ‘A Kantian theory of capitalism’, Business Ethics Quarterly SI (1) (1998), 37-60
10. R. E. Freeman and P. Werhane, ‘Business ethics: The state of the art’, International Journal of Management Review 1 (1) (1999), 1-16.
11. W. E. Evan and R. E. Freeman, ‘A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism’, in T. L. Beauchamp andN. E. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall (1988).
12. A. C. Wicks and R. E. Freeman, ‘Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism and the search for ethics’, Organization Science 9 (1998), 123-40.
13. D. Reed, ‘Stakeholder management theory: A critical theory perspective’, Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (3) (1999), 453-83.
14. T. Donaldson and T. Dunfee, Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press (1999).
15. R. E. Freeman, ‘A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation’, in T. L. Beauchamp, N. E. Bowie, and D. G. Arnold (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business Practice, 6th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall (2001), 56-65;
16. R. Phillips, ‘Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness’, Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (1) (1997), 51-66;
17. R. Phillips, ‘Stakeholder legitimacy’, Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1) (2003), 25-41.
18. N. M. Wijnberg, ‘Normative stakeholder theory and Aristotle: The link between ethics and politics’, Journal of Business Ethics 25 (2000), 329-42.
19. A. Argandofia, ‘The stakeholder and the common good’, Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9/10) (1998), 1,093-102.
20. A. L. Man and S. Miles, ‘Developing stakeholder theory’, Journal of Management Studies 39 (1) (2002), 1-21.
21. C. W. L. Hill and T. M. Jones, ‘Stakeholder agency theory’, Journal of Management Studies 29 (1992), 131-54.
22. A. C. Wicks, D. R. Gilbert, and R. E. Freeman, ‘A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (iv) (1994), 475-97.
23. D. Matten and J. Moon, ‘“Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility’, Academy of Management Review 33 (2) (2008), 404-24.
24. A. L. Friedman and S. Miles, Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2006).
25. M. B. E. Clarkson, ‘A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate performance’, Academy of Management Review 20 (1) (1995), 92-117.
26. R. Phillips, ‘Stakeholder legitimacy’, Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1) (2003), 2541.
27. R. K. Mitchell, B. R. Agle, and D. J. Wood, ‘Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts’, Academy of Management Review 22 (4) (1997), 853-86.
28. L. K. Trevino and G. R. Weaver, ‘The stakeholder research tradition: Converging theorists-not convergent theory’, Academy of Management Review 24 (2) (1999), 222-7.
29. G. R. Weaver, L. K. Trevino, and P L. Cochran, ‘Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices’, Academy of Management Journal 42 (5) (1999), 539-52.
30. T. Swift, ‘Trust, reputation and corporate accountability’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 10 (1) (2001), 16-26.
31. J. Hasnas, ‘The normative theories of business ethics: A guide for the perplexed’, Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (1) (1998), 127-46.
32. L. J. Mullins, Management and Organisational Behaviour. London: FT Prentice Hall (2004), 135.
33. N. Egels, Sorting out the Mess: A Review of Definitions of Ethical Issues in Business. Gothenburg: Gothenburg Research Institute (2005).
34. D. A. Gioia, ‘Practicability, paradigms, and problems in stakeholder theorizing’, Academy of Management Review 24 (2) (1999), 229-32.
35. R. Gray, D. Owen, and C. Adams, Accounting and Accountability. Harlow: Prentice Hall Europe (1996).
36. C. Stoney and D. Winstanley, ‘Stakeholding: Confusion or Utopia? Mapping the conceptual terrain’, Journal of Management Studies 38 (5) (2001), 603-26.
37. A. Geva, ‘Myth and ethics in business’, Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (4) (2001), 575-97.
38. P P Carson, P A. Lanier, K. D. Carson, and B. N. Guidry, ‘Clearing a path through the management fashion jungle: Some preliminary trailblazing’, Academy of Management Journal 43 (6) (2000), 1,143-58.
39. C. S. Spell, ‘Management fashions: Where do they come from, and are they old wine in new bottles?’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 10 (4) (2001), 358-73.
40. E. Jansson, ‘The stakeholder model: The influence of the ownership and governance structures’, Journal of Business Ethics 56 (1) (2005), 1-13.
41. S. B. Banerjee, ‘Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders and colonial discourses: The case of the Jabiluka uranium mine’, Organization and Environment 13 (1) (2001), 3-38.
42. J. Jonker and D. Foster, ‘Stakeholder excellence? Framing the evolution and complexity of a stakeholder perspective of the firm’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9 (4) (2002), 187-95.
43. T. Donaldson and L. E. Preston, ‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications’, Academy of Management Review 24 (1) (1995), 65-9.
44. S. B. Banerjee, Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar (2008), 26.
45. R. E. Freeman, Business Ethics: The State of the Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1991);
46. R. E. Freeman, J. S. Harrison, and A. C. Wicks, Managing for Stakeholders. Survival, Reputation, and Success. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press (2007). National Labor Committee, www.nlc.org (2006).
47. J. Mc Vea and R. E. Freeman, ‘A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management’, Journal of Management Inquiry 14 (2005), 57-69.
48. S. Benhabib, Situating the Self. New York: Routledge (1992).
49. S. Wolf, ‘Toward a systemic theory of informed consent in managed care’, Houston Law Review 14 (1999), 1,632.
50. P Pisek, ‘Redesigning of health care with insights from the science of complex systems’, in Committee of Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine Washington, DC (eds.), Crossing the Quality Chasm. A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press (2001), 309-23.
51. L. Emanuel, ‘Ethics and the structure of health care’, Cambridge Quarterly 9 (2000), 151-68.
52. P. H. Werhane, ‘Moral imagination and systems thinking’, Journal of Business Ethics 38 (2002), 33-42.
53. I. I. Mintroff and H. A. Linstone, Unbounded Mind: Breaking the Chains of Traditional Business Thinking. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (1993), 98.
54. K. Goodpaster, ‘Corporate responsibility and its constituents’, in T. Beauchamp and G. Brenkert (eds.), OxfordHandbookfor Business Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2009).
55. G. Yemen and E. Powell, The Female Health Company. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Darden School Publishing (2003).
56. Z. Bauman, Postmodern Ethics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell (1993).
57. G. Chandler, ‘Introduction: Defining corporate social responsibility’, Ethical Performance: Best Practice (Fall 2001). See www.rhcatalyst.org/site/DocServer/CSRQ_A.pdf?docID=103, accessed 10 November 2009.
58. A. Zielinski, Levinas-La Responsabilite est sans Pourquoi? Paris: University of Paris Press (2004).
59. E. Levinas, ‘Is ontology fundamental?’, in E. Levinas (ed.), Entre Nous: Thinking of the Other. London: Continuum Books (2006), 1-10
60. E. Levinas, Totality and Infinity-an Essay on Exteriority, A. Lingis (trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press (1969), 43.
61. E. Levinas, On Escape, B. Bergo (trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press (2003), 50.
62. E. Levinas, Alterity and Transcendence, M. B. Smith (trans.). London: Athlone Press (1999), 39.
63. D. Bevan, ‘Continental philosophy: A grounded theory approach and the emergence of convenient and inconvenient ethics’, in M. Painter-Morland and P Werhane (eds.), Cutting-edge Issues in Business Ethics: Continental Challenges to Tradition and Practice. New York: Springer (2008), 131-52.
64. T. Shearer, ‘Ethics and accountability: From the for-itself to the for-the-other’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 (2002), 541-73.
65. J. Roberts, ‘The manufacture of corporate social responsibility: Constructing corporate sensibility’, Organization 10 (2) (2003), 249-65.
66. D. Bevan and H. Corvellec, ‘The impossibility of corporate ethics: For a Levinasian approach to management ethics’, Business Ethics: A European Review 16 (3) (2007), 208-19.
67. M. Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, T. Parsons (trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover (1904; 1930; 2003).
68. Z. Bauman, Postmodern Ethics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell (1993), 193.
69. Z. Bauman, Wasted Lives. Cambridge: Polity Press (2004), 7.
70. M. Weber, Economy and Society. London: University of California Press (1922; 1978).
71. H. Arendt, The Human Condition (2nd edn.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (1999);
72. C. Card, The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of Evil. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (2005);
73. G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, B. Massumi (trans.). London: Continuum (2004);
74. R. Jackall, Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (2000).
75. A. J. Vetlesen, ‘Introducing an ethics of proximity’, in H. Jodalen and A. J. Vetlesen (eds.), Closeness: An Ethics. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press (1997), 1-19.
76. S. Key, L. Bewley, and S. Vault, Stakeholder Theory around the World: A Twenty-year Retrospective. Paper presented at the Academy of International Business-South-east (AIB-SE) (2004), Knoxville, TN.
77. E. Collins, K. Kearins, and J. Roper, ‘The risks in relying on stakeholder engagement for the achievement of sustainability’, Electronic Journal of Radical Organization Theory 9 (1) (2005), 1-19.