Negotiating the Polycentric City-region: Developmental State Politics of New Town Development in the Seoul Capital Region

Urban Studies

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1333-1355

  Lee, Yong Sook ^a   Shin, HaeRan ^b  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; NEGOTIATION PROCESS; POLICY APPROACH; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; TOWN PLANNING; TRIANGULATION; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN POLITICS; URBANIZATION;

SEOUL [SOUTH KOREA]; SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 84859840052     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098011411947     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aldridge M.The British New Towns: A Programme without a Policy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1979:.
2. Amsden A.Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989:.
3. Bae Y.,Sellers J. M.Globalization, the developmental state and the politics of urban growth in Korea: a multilevel analysis.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2007;31 (3): 547-560.
4. Bontje M.,Burdack J. Paper presented at the Post Suburbia Conference; 2009The Bartlett School of Planning, University College London; 2009.
5. Burawoy M.Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis. Burawoy M.Burton A.Ferguson A. A.Fox K. J., ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1991:271-287.
6. Byeon C. H.The characteristics of Pankyo New Town and new approach for the housing development and supply.Land Studies. 2005;16 (2): 55-71.
7. Charlesworth J.,Cochrane AImagining Cities: Scripts, Signs and Memory. Westwood S.Williams J., ed. London: Routledge; 1997:219-232.
8. Chu C. W.Planning for a Better Urban Living Environment in Asia. Yeh A. G.Ng M. K., ed. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2000:172-187.
9. Annual announcement report for bursting the bubble in sales price of an apartment. 2006;:.
10. Clapson M.A Social History of Milton Keynes: Middle England/Edge City. London: Frank Cass; 2004:.
11. From Chicago to Los Angeles: Making Sense of Urban Theory. Dear M., ed. London: Sage; 2002:.
12. Dear M.,Dahmann N.Urban politics and the Los Angeles school of urbanism.Urban Affairs Review. 2008;44:266-279.
13. Douglass M.Mega urban regions and world city formation: globalisation, the economic crisis and urban policy issues in Pacific Asia.Urban Studies. 2000;37 (12): 2315-2335.
14. Erie S.From Chicago to Los Angeles: Making Sense of Urban Theory. Dear M., ed. London: Sage; 2002:131-160.
15. Fishman R.Bourgeois Utopia: The Rise and Fall of Suburbia. New York: Basic Books; 1987:.
16. Fulton W.The Reluctant Metropolis: The Politics of Urban Growth in Los Angeles. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997:.
17. Garreau J.Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. New York: Doubleday; 1992:.
18. Grange A. L.,Jung H. N.The commodification of land and housing: the case of South Korea.Housing Studies. 2004;19 (4): 557-580.
19. A study of master plan and development demand analysis of Sungnam Pangyo development. Gyeonggi Province Government; 2003:.
20. Hill R. C.,Kim J.Global cities and developmental states: New York, Tokyo and Seoul.Urban Studies. 2000;37:2167-2195.
21. Jackson K. T.Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press; 1985:.
22. Johnson C.MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1982:.
23. Jung Ang Sunday Newspaper (2009) The regulation and development of Pangyo is the summary of 30 year real estate policy, 24January (http://sunday.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=10814; accessed July 2009) [in Korean].
24. Kim C. H.,Kim K. H.The political economy of Korean government policies on real estate.Urban Studies. 2000;37 (7): 1157-1169.
25. Kim S. H.,Ahn H. H.Seeking Shelter on the Pacific Rim: Financial Globalization, Social Change, and the Housing Market. Dymski G. A.Isenberg D., ed. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe; 2002:211-231.
26. Kim W. B.Urban and Regional Governance in the Asia Pacific. Friedmann J., ed. Vancouver: Institute of Asian Research, University of British Columbia; 1999:33-50.
27. Newtown Construction in the Capital Region: Progress Status. Bundang: KLDC; 2008:.
28. Knox P.Metroburbia, USA. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2008:.
29. Lang E.Edgeless Cities: Exploring the Elusive Metropolis. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2003:.
30. Laquian A. A.Beyond Metropolis: The Planning and Governance of Asia's Mega Urban Regions. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2005:.
31. Lee B. S. Paper presented at The Seoul Metropolitan Fora 1998, Sustainable Urban Competitiveness: Rethinking East Asian Cities; 1998Seoul, Korea; 1998.
32. Massey D.A global sense of place.Marxism Today. 1991;June:24-29.
33. McFarlane C.The comparative city: knowledge, learning, urbanism.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2010;:.
34. McGee T. G.The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia. Ginsberg N.Koppel B.McGee T. G., ed. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press; 1991:3-25.
35. The New Southeast Asia: Managing the Mega Urban Regions. McGee T. G.Robinson I., ed. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press; 1995:.
36. McKenzie E.Privatopia: Homeowners Associations end the Rise of Residential Private Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1994:.
37. Development ideas for the Pangyo planned city. Kwachon: MCT; 2001:.
38. Announcement No. 2004 436. Kwachon: MLTMA; 2004:.
39. Announcement No. 2008 735. Kwachon: MLTMA; 2008:.
40. Annual report of local fiscal. Kwachon: MPAS; 2010:.
41. Park B. G.Where do tigers sleep at night? The state's role in housing policy in South Korea and Singapore.Economic Geography. 1998;74 (3): 272-288.
42. Peterson P.City Limits. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1981:.
43. Phelps N. A.,Wood A. M.,Valler D. C. Paper presented at The Post Suburbia Conference; 2009The Bartlett School of Planning, University College London; 2009.
44. Phelps N. A.,Wood A. M.,Valler D. C.A post suburban world? An outline of a research agenda.Environment & Planning A. 2010;42 (2): 366-383.
45. Scott A.,Soja E.The City: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the End of the Twentieth Century. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1996:.
46. Sun, Daein (2005) The analysis on the 5 angles structure that supports the housing price bubble (http://blog.daum.net/cityhiro/1775517; accessed May 2009) [in Korean].
47. Teaford J. C.Post Suburbia: Government and Politics on the Edge Cities. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997:.
48. Wade R.Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1990:.
49. Ward K.Towards a relational comparative approach to the study of cities.Progress in Human Geography. 2010;34 (4): 471-487.