Solving the good-time puzzle: Why following the rules should get you out of prison early

Wisconsin Law Review

Volumn 2012, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 195-236

  O'hear, Michael M ^a  

^a MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859806561     PISSN: 0043650X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (112)

1. James B. Jacobs, Sentencing by Prison Personnel: Good Time, 30 UCLA L. REV. 217, 219-20 (1982).
2. Michael M. O'Hear, The Original Intent of Uniformity in Federal Sentencing, 74 U. CIN. L. REV. 749, 757-77 (2006).
3. Andrew von Hirsch, Penal Theories, in THE HANDBOOK OF CRIME AND PUNISHMENT 659 (Michael Tonry ed., 1998).
4. Nora V. Demleitner, Good Conduct Time: How Much and for Whom? The Unprincipled Approach of the Model Penal Code: Sentencing, 61 FLA. L. REV. 777 (2009).
5. MICHAEL TONRY, SENTENCING MATTERS 3 (1996).
6. JAMES Q. WHITMAN, HARSH JUSTICE: CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT AND THE WIDENING DIVIDE BETWEEN AMERICA AND EUROPE 3, 55 (2003).
7. LAUREN E. GLAZE, U.S. DEP'T OF JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL POPULATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES, 2009, at 7 (2010), available at http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/ pub/pdf/cpus09.pdf (noting that average annual increase in number of federal prisoners from 2000 to 2008 was 4.4%, as compared to only 1.5% for state prisoners);.
8. Michael M. O'Hear, National Uniformity/Local Uniformity: Reconsidering the Use of Departures to Reduce Federal-State Sentencing Disparities, 87 IOWA L. REV. 721, 730-33 (2002).
9. LINDA RADZIK, MAKING AMENDS: ATONEMENT IN MORALITY, LAW, AND POLITICS 9-10, 27- 30, 61, 69-72 (2009).
10. The seminal article in the law review literature is Stephen P. Garvey, Punishment as Atonement, 46 UCLA L. REV. 1801 (1999).
11. Michael A. Simons, Retribution for Rats: Cooperation, Punishment, and Atonement, 56 VAND. L. REV. 1, 12, 33-44 (2003) (quoting U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES MANUAL, § 5K1.1 (2002)).
12. Stephanos Bibas & Richard A. Bierschbach, Integrating Remorse and Apology into Criminal Procedure, 114 YALE L.J. 85, 87-91 (2004);.
13. Margareth Etienne, Remorse, Responsibility, and Regulating Advocacy: Making Defendants Pay for the Sins of Their Lawyers, 78 N.Y.U. L. REV. 2103, 2107-09 (2003);.
14. Jeffrie G. Murphy, Remorse, Apology, and Mercy, in CRIMINAL LAW CONVERSATIONS 185, 185- 95 (Paul H. Robinson et al. eds., 2009).
15. U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES MANUAL § 3E1.1 (2011).
16. N.H. REV. STAT. ANN. § 651-A:22(I) (2007 & Supp. 2011);.
17. TENN. CODE ANN. § 41-21-236(a)(3) (2010).
18. OKLA. STAT. tit. 57, § 138(A) (2004).
19. MO. REV. STAT. § 558.041(3) (2000), .
20. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 498.003(a) (West 2004).
21. MICH. ADMIN. CODE r. 791.5513(1)(c) (1999).
22. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 498.0042 (West 2004 & Supp. 2011).
23. DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11, § 4382(a) (2007).
24. R.I. GEN. LAWS § 42-56-24(c) (Supp. 2011).
25. Illinois caps forfeiture at one year per infraction, 730 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/3-6-3(c) (West 2007 & Supp. 2011), .
26. Louisiana at 180 days, LA. REV. STAT. ANN. § 15:571.4(B) (2005 & Supp. 2011).
27. COLO. REV. STAT. § 17-22.5-301(4) (2006);.
28. CONN. GEN. STAT. § 18-7a(c) (2006);.
29. KY. REV. STAT. ANN. § 197.045(2) (LexisNexis Supp. 2011);.
30. ME. REV. STAT. tit. 17-A, § 1253(9)(B) (2006 & Supp. 2011).
31. ALA. CODE § 14-9-41(f)(2) (2011);.
32. 730 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/3-6-3(5)(c) (2007 & Supp. 2011);.
33. MD. CODE ANN., CORR. SERVS. § 3-709(c) (LexisNexis 2008);.
34. MICH. COMP. LAWS § 800.33(5) (1998 & Supp. 2011);.
35. N.H. REV. STAT. ANN. § 651- A:22(IV)(c) (2007 & Supp. 2011);.
36. OKLA. STAT. tit. 57, § 138(A) (2004 & Supp. 2012);.
37. OR. REV. STAT. § 421.121(4) (2009);.
38. R.I. GEN. LAWS § 42-56-24(d) (2006);.
39. DIV. OF PRISONS, N. C. DEP'T OF CORR., POLICY & PROCEDURE, ch. B, § .0111(c) (May 31, 2011), available at http://www.doc.state.nc.us/dop/ policy-procedure-manual/b0100.pdf.
40. DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11, § 4382(b) (2007);.
41. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 498.004(a) (West 2004 & Supp. 2011).
42. ALA. CODE § 14-9-41(f)(2) (2011).
43. COLO. REV. STAT. § 17-22.5-301(3) (2006).
44. ME. REV. STAT. tit. 17-A, § 1253(9)(B) (2006).
45. MD. CODE ANN., CORR. SERVS. § 3-709 (LexisNexis 2008).
46. NEV. REV. STAT. § 209.451(3) (2011) ("The decision of the director regarding a forfeiture is final.");.
47. N.J. STAT. ANN. § 30:4-140 (West 2008).
48. Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 560-62, 568-70 (1974).
49. Cecelia Klingele, Changing the Sentence without Hiding the Truth: Judicial Sentence Modification as a Promising Method of Early Release, 52 WM. & MARY L. REV. 465, 515 (2010).
50. Dora Schriro, Is Good Time a Good Idea? A Practitioner's Perspective, 21 FED. SENT'G REP. 179, 179-80 (2009).
51. U.S. SENTENCING COMM'N, 2010 SOURCEBOOK OF FEDERAL SENTENCING STATISTICS tbl.18 (indicating that 94.9% of federal defendants had their sentences reduced on this basis in fiscal year 2010).
52. State v. Strupp, No. 2010AP1806-CR, slip op. at 6 (Wis. Ct. App. Aug. 4, 2011), available at http://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf? content=pdf&seqNo=69082.
53. U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES MANUAL § 3E1.1 (2010).
54. Michael M. O'Hear, Remorse, Cooperation, and "Acceptance of Responsibility": The Structure, Implementation, and Reform of Section 3E1.1 of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, 91 NW. U. L. REV. 1507, 1539 (1997) (discussing study showing that eighty-eight percent of defendants pleading guilty received the discount, while only twenty percent of those going to trial did).
55. U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES MANUAL § 3E1.1 cmt. n.2 ("Conviction by trial, however, does not automatically preclude a defendant from consideration for such a reduction.");.
56. William W. Wilkins, Jr., Plea Negotiations, Acceptance of Responsibility, Role of the Offender, and Departures: Policy Decisions in the Promulgation of Federal Sentencing Guidelines, 23 WAKE FOREST L. REV. 181, 191 (1988).
57. Michael M. O'Hear, Beyond Rehabilitation: A New Theory of Indeterminate Sentencing, 48 AM. CRIM. L. REV. 1247, 1253-59 (2011).
58. NICK SMITH, I WAS WRONG: THE MEANINGS OF APOLOGIES 17 (2008).
59. FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(b)(1) (requiring court to address the defendant "personally" before accepting guilty plea).
60. FED. R. CRIM. P. 32(i)(4)(A)(ii) (requiring sentencing judge to "address the defendant personally in order to permit the defendant to speak or present any information to mitigate the sentence").
61. Mark W. Bennett, Heartstrings or Heartburn: A Federal Judge's Musings on Defendants' Right and Rite of Allocution, CHAMPION, Mar. 2011, at 26, 26-29.
62. U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES MANUAL § 3E1.1 cmt. n.1(A) (2010).
63. FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(b)(3).
64. U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES MANUAL § 1B1.3(a)(3) (2010).
65. U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES MANUAL § 3E1.1 cmt. n.1(B) (2010).
66. Michael M. O'Hear, Appellate Review of Sentences: Reconsidering Deference, 51 WM. & MARY L. REV. 2123, 2141 (2010) (discussing link between access to demeanor evidence and appellate deference).
67. United States v. Knight, 905 F.2d 189, 192 (8th Cir. 1990).
68. David Eagleman, The Brain on Trial, ATLANTIC, July/Aug. 2011, at 112, 121 (discussing study showing that recidivism risk of sex offenders does not correlate with low remorse or denial of the crime).
69. Allison D. Redlich et al., Comparing True and False Confessions among Persons with Serious Mental Illness, 17 PSYCHOL. PUB. POL'Y & L. 394, 407, 410 (2011) (reporting results of study of defendants who confessed; when asked about experiencing sense of relief, subjects' average response was 4.19, with "1" meaning "not at all" and "7" meaning "very much so").
70. R.A. DUFF, PUNISHMENT, COMMUNICATION, AND COMMUNITY 72 (2001).
71. Michael M. O'Hear, Rethinking Drug Courts: Restorative Justice as a Response to Racial Injustice, 20 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 463, 478-79 (2009).
72. United States v. Pulley, 601 F.3d 660, 667-68 (7th Cir. 2010) (affirming district court's decision not to grant further sentence reduction based on "extraordinary acceptance of responsibility");
73. United States v. Masek, 588 F.3d 1283, 1290-91 (10th Cir. 2009).
74. Michael M. O'Hear, Drug Treatment Courts as Communicative Punishment, in RETRIBUTIVISM HAS A PAST, HAS IT A FUTURE? 234 (Michael Tonry ed., 2011).
75. Michael M. O'Hear, Plea Bargaining and Procedural Justice, 42 GA. L. REV. 407, 434-35 (2008).
76. Sharon Dolovich, Strategic Segregation in the Modern Prison, 48 AM. CRIM. L. REV. 1, 2 (2011).
77. 730 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/3-6-3(a)(5) (Supp. 2011).
78. U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES MANUAL § 3E1.1(a) (2010).
79. Eric S. Janus & Robert A. Prentky, Sexual Predator Laws: A Two- Decade Retrospective, 21 FED. SENT'G REP. 90, 91 (2008) (noting that twenty states and the federal government adopted civil commitment laws for sexually violent predators beginning in 1990).
80. WYO. DEP'T OF CORR., POLICY AND PROCEDURE #1.500: INMATE GOOD TIME 9-13 (2010), available at http://corrections.wy.gov/Media.aspx?mediaId=50.
81. Margo Schlanger, Inmate Litigation, 116 HARV. L. REV. 1555, 1654-57 (2003).
82. KATE STITH & JOSÉ A. CABRANES, FEAR OF JUDGING: SENTENCING GUIDELINES IN THE FEDERAL COURTS 81-82 (1998).
83. COLO. REV. STAT. § 17-22.5-301(1) (2006).
84. CONN. GEN. STAT. § 18-7a(c) (2006).
85. DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11, § 4381(c)(2) (Supp. 2010).
86. KAN. STAT. ANN. § 22-3717(b)(1) (2007 & Supp. 2010).
87. KAN. STAT. ANN. § 21-6821(d)(1)-(5) (Supp. 2011).
88. KY. REV. STAT. ANN. § 197.045(1)(b)1. (West Supp. 2011).
89. LA. REV. STAT. ANN. § 15:571.3(B)(1)(a) (Supp. 2011).
90. LA. REV. STAT. ANN. § 15:1190 (2005).
91. ME. REV. STAT. tit. 17-A, § 1253(9)(A) (2006 & Supp. 2011).
92. ME. REV. STAT. tit. 17-A, § 1253(9)(B).
93. MD. CODE ANN., CORR. SERVS. § 3-704(b)(1)(ii) (LexisNexis 2008).
94. MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 127, § 129D (2003).
95. 103 MASS. CODE REGS. § 410.14 (2011).
96. MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 127, § 129D.
97. MICH. COMP. LAWS § 800.33(5) (1998 & Supp. 2011).
98. MO. CODE REGS. ANN. tit. 14, § 10-5.010(2)(A) (Supp. 2011).
99. MO. REV. STAT. § 558.041(1) (2011).
100. NEV. REV. STAT § 209.4465(1) (2011).
101. N.H. REV. STAT. ANN. § 651-A:22(III) (2007 & Supp. 2011).
102. N.J. STAT. ANN. § 30:4-140 (West 2008).
103. OKLA. STAT. tit. 57, § 138(A), (D)(2)(c) (2004 & Supp. 2012).
104. OR. REV. STAT. § 421.121(2)(b) (2009).
105. R.I. GEN. LAWS § 42-56-24(b) (Supp. 2011).
106. R.I. GEN. LAWS § 42-56-24(c) (2006 & Supp. 2011).
107. S.C. CODE ANN. § 24-13-210(A) (2007 & Supp. 2011).
108. S.D. CODIFIED LAW § 24-2-18 (2004 & Supp. 2011).
109. TENN. CODE ANN. § 41-21-236(a)(2)(A) (2010).
110. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 498.003(b) (West 2004).
111. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 498.004(a) (West 2004 & Supp. 2011).
112. WASH. REV. CODE § 9.94A.729(c) (2011).