7 tesla imaging of cerebral radiation necrosis after arteriovenous malformations treatment using amide proton transfer (APT) imaging

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1207-1209

  Gerigk, Lars ^a   Schmitt, Benjamin ^a   Stieltjes, Bram ^a   Röder, Falk ^a   Essig, Marco ^a   Bock, Michael ^a   Schlemmer, Heinz Peter ^a   Röthke, Matthias ^a  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

7T; APT; AVM; CEST; Radiation necrosis; Ultra high field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMIDE PROTON TRANSFER IMAGING; ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; BRAIN NECROSIS; CASE REPORT; CORPUS CALLOSUM; DEVICES; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; NEUROIMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION NECROSIS; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NECROSIS; PROTONS; RADIATION INJURIES; RADIOSURGERY;

EID: 84859792996     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23534     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Starke RM, Komotar RJ, Hwang BY, et al. A comprehensive review of radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: outcomes, predictive factors, and grading scales. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2008;86:191-199. (Pubitemid 351685471)
2. Liscak R, Vladyka V, Simonova G, et al. Arteriovenous malformations after Leksell gamma knife radiosurgery: rate of obliteration and complications. Neurosurgery 2007;60:1005-1014; discussion 1015-1016.
3. Pollock BE, Gorman DA, Coffey RJ. Patient outcomes after arteriovenous malformation radiosurgical management: results based on a 5- to 14-year follow-up study. Neurosurgery 2003;52: 1291-1296; discussion 1296-1297.
4. Lunsford LD, Niranjan A, Kondziolka D, Sirin S, Flickinger JC. Arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery: a twenty year perspective. Clin Neurosurg 2008;55:108-119.
5. Mori S, Eleff SM, Pilatus U, Mori N, van Zijl PC. Proton NMR spectroscopy of solvent-saturable resonances: a new approach to study pH effects in situ. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:36-42. (Pubitemid 28292582)
6. Zhou J, Payen JF, Wilson DA, Traystman RJ, van Zijl PC. Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI. Nat Med 2003;9:1085-1090. (Pubitemid 37021791)
7. Zhou J, Tryggestad E, Wen Z, et al. Differentiation between glioma and radiation necrosis using molecular magnetic resonance imaging of endogenous proteins and peptides. Nat Med 2011;17:130-134.
8. Chang TC, Shirato H, Aoyama H, et al. Stereotactic irradiation for intracranial arteriovenous malformation using stereotactic radiosurgery or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;60:861-870. (Pubitemid 39311767)
9. Finitsis S, Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Lebedinsky A, Marchal C, Picard L. Symptomatic radionecrosis after AVM stereotactic radiosurgery. Study of 16 consecutive patients. Interv Neuroradiol 2005;11:25-33. (Pubitemid 40867615)
10. Zabel A, Milker-Zabel S, Huber P, Schulz-Ertner D, Schlegel W, Debus J. Treatment outcome after linac-based radiosurgery in cerebral arteriovenous malformations: retrospective analysis of factors affecting obliteration. Radiother Oncol 2005;77:105-110. (Pubitemid 41503398)
11. Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations of the brain. J Neurosurg 1991;75:512-524.
12. Friedman WA, Bova FJ, Bollampally S, Bradshaw P. Analysis of factors predictive of success or complications in arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 2003;52:296-307; discussion 307-308.
13. Wen Z, Hu S, Huang F, et al. MR imaging of high-grade brain tumors using endogenous protein and peptide-based contrast. Neuroimage 2010;51:616-622.
14. Mougin OE, Coxon RC, Pitiot A, Gowland PA. Magnetization transfer phenomenon in the human brain at 7 T. Neuroimage 2010;49:272-281.