IT infrastructure components for biobanking

Applied Clinical Informatics

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 419-429

  Prokosch, Hans Ulrich ^a   Beck, A ^a   Ganslandt, T ^a   Hummel, M ^b   Kiehntopf, M ^c   Sax, U ^d   Uckert F ^e   Semler, S ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^c FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^f TMF eV   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biobanking; Requirement specification; Translational research information technology infrastructure

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859792285     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18690327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2010-05-RA-0034     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Butte AJ. Translational Bioinformatics: Coming of Age. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15(6):709-714.
2. Grant A et al. Integrating feedback from a clinical data warehouse into practice organisation. Int J Med Inform 2006; 5(3-4): 232-239.
3. Rubin DL, Desser TS. A data warehouse for integrating radiologic and pathologic data. J Am Coll Radiol 2008; 5(3): 210-217.
4. Barrett JS, Koprowski SP Jr. The epiphany of data warehousing technologies in the pharmaceutical industry. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002; 40(3): S3-S13.
5. Dorda W, Gall W, Duftschmid G. Clinical data retrieval: 25 years of temporal query management at the University of Vienna Medical School. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41(2): 89-97.
6. Brandt CA et al. TrialDB: A web-based Clinical Study Data Management System. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003: 794.
7. Sahoo U, Bhatt A. Electronic data capture (EDC)-a new mantra for clinical trials. Qual Assur 2003; 3-4: 117-121.
8. Cuticchia AJ, Cooley PC, Hall RD, Qin Y. NIDDK data repository: a central collection of clinical trial data. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006; 6: 19.
9. Welker JA. Implementation of electronic data capture systems: barriers and solutions. Contemp Clin Trials 2007; 3: 329-336.
10. Ene-Iordache B et al. Developing regulatory-compliant electronic case report forms for clinical trials: experience with the demand trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16(3): 404-408.
11. El Emam K et al. The use of electronic data capture tools in clinical trials: Web-survey of 259 Canadian trials. J Med Internet Res 2009; 11(1): e8.
12. Murray E et al. Methodological Challenges in Online Trials. J Med Internet Res 2009; 11(1): e9.
13. Stege A, Hummel M. Erfahrungen bei Einrichtung und Betrieb einer Biobank. Pathologe 2008; [Suppl. 2] 29: 214-217.
14. Posch MG et al. The Biomaterialbank of the German Competence Network of Heart Failure (CNHF) is a valuable resource for biomedical and genetic research. Int J Cardiol 2008; 136: 118-111. Doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.089.
15. Angelow A et al. Methods and implementation of a central biosample and data management in a threecentre clinical study. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 2008; 91: 82-90.
16. Sung NS et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA 2003; 289(10): 1278-1287.
17. Loft S, Poulsen HE. Cancer risk and oxidative DNA damage in man. J Mol Med 1996; 74: 297-312.
18. Creation and Governance of Human Genetic Research Databases. OECD Publishing. 25 October 2006. ISBN-92-64-02852-8.
19. Yuille M et al. Biobanking for Europe. Brief Bioinformatics 2007. 9: 14-24.
20. Patel AA et al. An informatics model for tissue banks-lessons learned from the Cooperative Prostate Cancer Tissue Resource. BMC Cancer 2006; 6: 120.
21. Patel AA et al. The development of common data elements for a multi-institute prostate cancer tissue bank: the Cooperative Prostate Cancer Tissue Resource (CPCTR) experience. BMC Cancer 2005; 5: 108.
22. Ölund G, Lindqvist P, Litton JE. BIMS: An information management system for biobanking in the 21st century. IBM Systems Journal 2007; 46: 171-182.
23. Prokosch HU et al. TMF IT Strategie, Teilprojekt 3: Erstellung eines Anforderungskatalogs zur ITUnterstützung von Biomaterialbanken und Analyse der derzeit in Deutschland verfügbaren ITWerkzeuge zur Unterstützung des Managements von Biomaterialbanken. TMF Abschlussbericht, 18.1.2010.
24. Asslaber M, Zatloukal K. Biobanks: transnational, European and global networks. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2007; 3: 193-201.
25. Yuille M et al. The UK DNA banking network: a "fair access" biobank. Cell Tissue Bank 2009; 11: 241-251. Doi: 10.1007/s10561-009-9150-3.
26. Asslaber M et al. The Genome Austria Tissue Bank (GATiB). Pathobiology 2007; 74(4): 251-258.
27. Viertler C, Zatloukal K. Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (BBMRI). Implications for pathology. Pathologe 2008; 29 (Suppl. 2): 210-213.
28. Rudan I et al. "10001 Dalmatians:" Croatia launches its national biobank. Croat Med J 2009; 50(1): 4-6.
29. Reng CM, Debold P, Specker CH, Pommerening K. Generische Lösungen zum Datenschutz für die Forschungsnetze in der Medizin. Schriftenreihe des TMF e.V., Band 1, 2006.
30. Becker R, Ihle P, Pommerening K, Harnischmacher U. Ein generisches Datenschutzkonzept für Biomaterialbanken (Version 1.0), TMF Bericht, April 2006.
31. Pommerening K, Becker R, Sellge E, Semler SC. Datenschutz in Biomaterialbanken. In: Steyer G, Tolxdorff T [Eds.]. TELEMED 2006: Gesundheitsversorgung im Netz. Tagungsband zur 11. Fortbildungsveranstaltung und Arbeitstagung-Nationales Forum zur Telematik für die Gesundheit. Berlin: Aka GmbH, 2006: 89-99.
32. Godard B et al. Data storage and DNA banking for biomedical research: informed consent, confidentiality, quality issues, ownership, return of benefits. A professional perspective. Eur J Hum Genet 2003; 11(Suppl. 2): S88-S122. Doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201114.
33. van Veen EB et al. TuBaFrost 3: regulatory and ethical issues on the exchange of residual tissue for research across Europe. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42: 2914-2923.
34. Sweeney L. k-Anonymity: A Model for Protecting Privacy. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 2002; 10(5): 557-570.
35. Sweeney L. Achieving k-Anonymity privacy protection using generalization and suppression. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 2002; 10(5): 571-588.
36. Stark K, Eder H, Zatloukal K. Priority-based k-anonymity accomplished by weighted generalisation structures. Computer Sci 2006; LNCS 4081: 394-404.
37. Betsou F et al. Standard preanalytical coding for biospecimens: Defining the sample PREanalytical Code. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(4): OF1-8.
38. Watson PH et al. Evolutionary concepts in biobanking-the BC BioLibrary. J Transl Med 2009; 7: 95. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-7-95.
39. Betsou F. Biobanks in immunoanalysis and specialised biology. Immunoanalyse et Biologie Spécialisée 2006; 21(6): 327-332.