Energy source perceptions and policy support: Image associations, emotional evaluations, and cognitive beliefs

Energy Policy

Volumn 45, Issue , 2012, Pages 478-489

  Truelove, Heather Barnes ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affective images; Nuclear energy; Public perceptions

Indexed keywords

AFFECTIVE IMAGES; EMOTIONAL REACTIONS; ENERGY SOURCE; IMAGE EVALUATION; POLICY MAKERS; POLICY SUPPORT; PUBLIC PERCEPTION;

NATURAL GAS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; WIND POWER;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

COAL; COGNITION; ENERGY MARKET; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY RESOURCE; FUTURE PROSPECT; NATURAL GAS; NUCLEAR POWER; PERCEPTION; POLICY APPROACH; RESEARCH WORK; WIND POWER;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84859785972     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.059     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991, 50:179-211.
2. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. The influence of attitudes on behavior. The Handbook of Attitudes 2005, 173-221. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. D. Albarracín, B.T. Johnson, M.P. Zanna (Eds.).
3. Ansolabehere, S. (2007). Public attitudes toward America's energy options: Insights for nuclear energy.
4. Ansolabehere S., Konisky D.M. Public attitudes toward construction of new power plants. Public Opinion Quarterly, advance access 2009, 1-12. doi:〈http://poq.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/nfp041v1〉.
5. Armitage C.J., Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. The British Journal of Social Psychology 2001, 40:471-499.
6. Bamberg S., Moser G. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2007, 27:14-25.
7. Bickerstaff K., Lorenzoni I., Pidgeon N.F., Poortinga W., Simmons P. Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science 2008, 17:145-169.
8. Burstein P. Bringing the public back in: should sociologists consider the impact of public opinion on public policy?. Social Forces 1998, 77(1):27-62.
9. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M.P. Zanna, J.M. Olson & C.P. Herman (Eds.), Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 5. Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 3-39). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Cialdini R.B., Reno R.R., Kallgren C.A. A focus theory of normative conduct - recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 58(6):1015-1026.
11. Costa-Font J., Rudisill C., Mossialos E. Attitudes as an expression of knowledge and "political anchoring": the case of nuclear power in the United Kingdom. Risk Analysis 2008, 28:1273-1287.
12. de Groot J., Steg L. Morality and nuclear energy: Perceptions of risks and benefits, personal norms, and willingness to take action related to nuclear energy. Risk Analysis 2010, 30:1363-1373.
13. Devine-Wright P. Public participation, social influence and the shaping of support for wind energy in the UK. Working paper on renewable energy, Institute of Energy and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University. As cited in Devine-Wright, P. (2005) beyond NIMBYim: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy 2003, 8:125-139.
14. Epstein S. Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist 1994, 49:709-724.
15. Gallup. (2010). Poll March 4-7, 2010. Retrieved February 17, 2011, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/126827/support-nuclear-power-climbs-new-high.aspx?version=print.
16. Goldstein N.J., Cialdini R.B., Griskevicius V. A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research 2008, 35(3):472-482.
17. Greenberg M. Energy sources, public policy, and public preferences: analysis of US national and site-specific data. Energy Policy 2009, 37:3242-3249.
18. Greenberg M. NIMBY, CLAMP, and the location of new nuclear-related facilities: U.S. national and 11 site-specific surveys. Risk Analysis 2009, 29:1242-1254.
19. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Summary for policymakers. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, 7-22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. M.L. Perry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P. Linden, C.E. Hanson (Eds.).
20. Jenkins-Smith H. Modeling stigma: an empirical analysis of nuclear images of Nevada. Risk, Media, and Stigma 2001, 107-131. Earthscan, London. J. Flynn, P. Slovic, H. Kunreuther (Eds.).
21. Jones C.R., Eiser R.J. Understanding 'local' opposition to wind development in the UK: how big is a backyard?. Energy Policy 2010, 38(6):3106-3117.
22. Leiserowitz A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change 2006, 77:45-72.
23. Loewenstein G.F., Weber E.U., Hsee C.K., Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin 2001, 127(2):267-286.
24. Lorenzoni I., Leiserowitz A., Doria M.D., Poortinga W., Pidgeon N.F. Cross-national comparisons of image associations with "global warming" and "climate change" among laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain. Journal of Risk Research 2006, 9(3):265-281.
25. McCright A.M. The social bases of climate change knowledge, concern, and polcy support in the U.S. general public. Hofstra Law Review 2009, 37:1017-1046.
26. Nolan J.M., Schultz P., Cialdini R.B., Goldstein N.J., Griskevicius V. Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2008, 34:913-923.
27. Oreskes N. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 2004, 306(5702):1686.
28. Pacala S., Socolow R. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 2004, 305(5686):968-972.
29. Peters E., Slovic P. The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1996, 26:1427-1453.
30. Peters E., Slovic P. Affective asynchrony and the measurement of the affective attitude component. Cognition and Emotion 2007, 21:300-329.
31. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change 1986, Springer-Verlag, New York.
32. Pew Research/National Journal Congressional Connection. (2010). Poll (July 29-August 1, 2010). Retrieved March 21, 2011: http://www.pollingreport.com/energy.htm.
33. Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., & Lorenzoni, I. (2006). Public perceptions of nuclear power, climate change and energy options in Britain: Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted during October and November 2005. Understanding Risk Working Paper 06-02: School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia.
34. Reiner D.M., Curry T.E., de Figueiredo M.A., Herzog H.J., Ansolabehere S.D., Itaoka K., et al. American exceptionalism? Similarities and differences in national attitudes toward energy policy and global warming. Environmental Science & Technology 2006, 40(7):2093-2098.
35. Rivis A., Sheeran P. Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. Current Psychology 2003, 22(3):218-233.
36. Rundmo T. Associations between affect and risk perceptions. Journal of Risk Research 2002, 5:119-135.
37. Schultz P.W., Khazian A.M., Zaleski A.C. Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Social Influence 2008, 3(1):4-23.
38. Schultz P.W., Nolan J.M., Cialdini R.B., Goldstein N.J., Griskevicius V. The constructive, destructive and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science 2007, 18(5):429-434.
39. Sherif M. The Psychology of Social Norms 1936, Harper, New York.
40. Sjöberg L. Emotions and risk perception. Risk Management 2007, 9:223-237.
41. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science 1987, 236:280-285.
42. Slovic P., Finucane M.L., Peters E., MacGregor D.G. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis 2004, 24(2):311-322.
43. Slovic P., Flynn J.H., Layman M. Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science 1991, 254(5038):1603-1607.
44. Slovic P., Layman M., Flynn J.H. Risk perception, trust, and nuclear waste - Lessons from Yucca Mountain. Environment 1991, 33(3):6-11.
45. Slovic P., Peters E., Finucane M.L., MacGregor D.G. Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychology 2005, 24(4):S35-S40.
46. Spence A., Poortinga W., Pidgeon N., Lorenzoni I. Public perceptions of energy choices: the influence of beliefs about climate change and the environment. Energy & Environment 2010, 21:385-407.
47. Truelove, H.B., Greenberg, M., & Powers, C. (2010). Climate change beliefs and support for nuclear power and other energy sources. Poster Presented at the Behavior Energy and Climate Change Conference.
48. Tuler S. Lessons from the Past: Addressing Facility Siting Controversies. Invited Presentation to the Workshop on Addressing the Challenges of Climate Change through the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Committee on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change 2009, National Research Council, December 3-4, 2009.
49. U.S. Census Bureau (2010a).Table DP-1. Profile of general demographic characteristics: 2010. Retrieved January 5, 2012 from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_DP_DPDP1&prodType=table.
50. U.S. Census Bureau (2010b).Table DP02. Selected social characteristics in the United States. 2010 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. Retrieved January 5, 2012 from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_10_1YR_DP02&prodType=table.
51. U.S. Census Bureau (2010c).Table S1901. Income in the past 12 months (in 2010 inflation-adjusted dollars. 2010 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. Retrieved January 5, 2012 from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_10_1YR_S1901&prodType=table.
52. U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2009). Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2008. Washington DC.
53. U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2010). Annual Energy Review 2009. Washington, DC.
54. Weisser D. A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies. Energy 2007, 32(9):1543-1559.
55. Whitfield S.C., Rosa E.A., Dan A., Dietz T. The future of nuclear power: value orientations and risk perception. Risk Analysis 2009, 29:425-437.
56. Zajonc R.B. Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist 1980, 35:151-175.