Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: A microleakage study

Indian Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 799-803

  Popoff, Daniela Araújo Veloso ^a   Gonçalves, Fabiana Santos ^a   Magalhães, Cláudia Silami ^a   Moreira, Allyson Nogueira ^a   Ferreira, Raquel Conceição ^b   Mjör, Ivar A ^c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF MONTES CLAROS   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental amalgam; dental leakage; dental resin; dental restoration failure

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; ADPER SINGLE BOND 2; AMALGAM; COPPER; DENTAL MATERIAL; PERMITE C; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME AND BOND 2.1; RESIN; SILICON DIOXIDE; SILVER; TOOTH CEMENT; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SILVER STAINING; TEMPERATURE; TIME; TOOTH DISEASE;

ACETONE; COMPOSITE RESINS; COPPER; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION REPAIR; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; SILICON DIOXIDE; SILVER; SILVER STAINING; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84859785902     PISSN: 09709290     EISSN: 19983603     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.94672     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Shen C, Speigel J, Mjör IA. Repair strength of dental amalgams. Oper Dent 2006;31:122-6.
2. Forss H, Widström E. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults. Acta Odontol Scand 2004;62:82-6.
3. Silva AF, Piva E, Demarco FF, Correr Sobrinho L, Osinaga PW. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: Influence of cavity volume. Oper Dent 2006;31:377-83.
4. Özcan M, Vallittu PK, Huysmans MC, Kalk W, Vahlberg T. Bond strength of resin composite to differently conditioned amalgam. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006;17:7-13.
5. Gordan VV, Riley JL, Blaser PK, Mjör IA. Two-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 2006;31:418-25.
6. Çehreli SB, Arhun N, Celik C. Amalgam repair: Quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with diffrente surface treatments. Oper Dent 2010;35:337-44.
7. Popoff DA, Gonçalves FS, Ferreira RC, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN, Mjör IA. Repair of amalgam restorations with conventional and bonded amalgam: An in vitro study. J Dent Sci 2010;25:154-8.
8. Moncada G, Fernández E, Martin J, Arancibia C, Mjör I, Gordan VV. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: A two-year clinical trial. Oper Dent 2008;33:258-64.
9. Mjör IA, Reep RL, Kubilis PS, Mondragon BE. Change in size of replaced amalgam restorations: A methodological study. Oper Dent 1998;23:272-7.
10. Rossomando KJ, Wendt SL Jr. Thermocycling and dwell times in microleakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dent Mater 1995;11:47-51.
11. Mahler DB, Bryant RW. Microleakage of amalgam alloys: An update. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1351-6.
12. Vargas J, Matsumura H, Masuhara E. Bonding of amalgam filling to tooth cavity with adhesive resin. Dent Mater J 1986;5:158-64.
13. Setcos JC, Staninec M, Wilson NH. Bonding of amalgam restorations: Existing knowledge and future prospects. Oper Dent 2000;25:121-9.
14. Muniz M, Quioca J, Dolci GS, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Bonded amalgam restorations: Microleakage and tensile bond strength evaluation. Oper Dent 2005;30:228-33.
15. Leloup G, D'Hoore W, Bouter D, Degrange M, Vreven J. Metaanalytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. J Dent Res 2001;80:1605-14.
16. Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M, Wilson N. Adhesively bonded versus nonbonded amalgam restorations for dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;9: CD007517.
17. Machado C, Sanchez E, Alapati S, Seghi R, Johnston W. Shear bond strength of the amalgam-resin composite interface. Oper Dent 2007;32:341-6.
18. Hadavi F, Hey JH, Ambrose ER, Elbadrawy HE. Effect of different adhesive systems on microleakage at the amalgam/composite resin interface. Oper Dent 1993;18:2-7.
19. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: A review. Oper Dent 1997;22:173-85.
20. Christensen GJ. When and how to repair a failing restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:1605-7.
21. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore memorial lecture: Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004;29: 481-508.
22. Raskin A, D'Hoore W, Gonthier S, Degrange M, Déjou J. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: A literature review. J Adhes Dent 2001;3: 295-308.
23. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenge. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-35.
24. Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T, Donassolo TA, Sommer L, Strapasson A, Demarco FF. Influence of thermal stress on marginal integrity of restorative materials. J Appl Oral Sci 2008;16:106-10.
25. Davis R, Overton JD. Efficacy of bonded and nonbonded amalgam in the treatment of teeth with incomplete fractures. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:469-78.
26. Özer F, Ünlü, N. Öztürk B, Sengun. Amalgam repair: Evaluation of bond strength and microleakage. Oper Dent 2002;27:199-203.
27. Zardiackas LD, Stoner GE. Tensile and shear adhesion of amalgam to tooth structure using selective interfacial amalgamation. Biomaterials 1983;4:9-13.
28. Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: The monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:97-116.
29. Costella AM, Trochmann JL, Oliveira WS. Water sorption and diffusion coefficient through an experimental dental resin. J Mat Sci Mater Med 2010;21:67-72.