Comparison of analyses of the QTLMAS XIV common dataset. I: Genomic selection

BMC Proceedings

Volumn 5, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2011, Pages

  Pszczola, Marcin ^a,b   Strabel, Tomasz ^a   Wolc, Anna ^a,c   Mucha, Sebastian ^a   Szydlowski, MacIej ^a  

^a POZNA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINARY TRAIT; BIOLOGICAL TRAIT; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOME; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; SEX DIFFERENCE;

EID: 84859778325     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17536561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Prediction of Total Genetic Value Using Genome-Wide Dense Marker Maps. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Genetics 2001 157 4 1819 1829 11290733 (Pubitemid 32298846)
2. Applications of single nucleotide polymorphisms in crop genetics. Rafalski A, Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2002 5 2 94 100 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00240-6 11856602 (Pubitemid 34190373)
3. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 2 433 443 10.3168/jds.2008-1646 19164653
4. Impact of genomics on animal agriculture and opportunities for animal health. Rothschild MF, Plastow GS, Trends in Biotechnology 2008 26 1 21 25 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.10.001 18022262
5. Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: Strategies and lessons. Dekkers JCM, J Anim Sci 2004 82 13-suppl 313 328 15471812
6. Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome. Xu S, Genetics 2003 163 2 789 12618414
7. Analysis of genetic marker-phenotype relationships by jack-knifed partial least squares regression (PLSR). Bjornstad A, Westad F, Martens H, Hereditas 2004 141 2 149 165 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2004.01816.x 15660976 (Pubitemid 39642664)
8. A comparison of random forests, boosting and support vector machines for genomic selection with SNP markers. Ogutu JO, Piepho H-P, Schulz-Streeck T, BMC Proceedings 2011 5 Suppl 3 11 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S11 21554759
9. QTL-MAS 2010: Simulated Dataset. Szydlowski M, Paczynska P, BMC Proceedings 2011 5 Suppl 3 4 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S4 21554762
10. Estimating genomic breeding values and detecting QTL using univariate and bivariate models. Calus MPL, Mulder HA, Veerkamp RF, BMC Proceedings 2011 5 Suppl 3 5 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S5 21554763
11. Genotype imputation for the prediction of genomic breeding values in non-genotyped and low-density genotyped individuals. Cleveland MA, Hickey JM, Kinghorn BP, BMC Proceedings 2011 5 Suppl 3 6 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S6 21554764
12. Partial least square regression applied to the QTLMAS 2010 dataset. Coster A, Calus MPL, BMC Proceedings 2011 5 Suppl 3 7 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S7 21554765
13. Applying different genomic selection approaches on QTL-MAS 2010 data. Nadaf J, Pong-Wong R, BMC Proceedings 2011 5 Suppl 3 9 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S9 21554767
14. Pre-selection of markers for genome-wide selection. Schulz-Streeck T, Ogutu JO, Piepho H-P, BMC Proceedings 2011 5 Suppl 3 12 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3- S12 21645291
15. Hierarchical likelihood opens a new way of estimating genetic values using genome-wide dense marker maps. Shen X, Ronnegard L, Carlborg O, BMC Proceedings 2011 5 Suppl 3 14 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S14 21645293
16. Genomic Breeding Value Prediction and QTL Mapping of QTLMAS 2010 Data Using Bayesian Methods. Sun X, Dekkers JCM, BMC Proceedings 2011 5 Suppl 3 13 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S13 21645292
17. Genomic selection for QTL-MAS data using a trait specific relationship matrix. Zhang Z, Ding X, Liu J, de Koning D-J, Zhang Q, BMC Proceedings 2011 5 Suppl 3 15 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S15 21645294
18. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. Muir WM, J Anim Breed Genet 2007 124 6 342 355 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00700.x 18076471 (Pubitemid 350231126)
19. Prediction of haplotypes for ungenotyped animals and its effect on marker-assisted breeding value estimation. Mulder HA, Calus MPL, Veerkamp RF, Genet Sel Evol 2010 42 1 10.1186/1297-9686-42-10
20. The effect of missing marker genotypes on the accuracy of gene-assisted breeding value estimation: a comparison of methods. Mulder HA, Meuwissen THE, Calus MPL, Veerkamp RF, Anim 2010 4 9 19 10.1017/S1751731109990838
21. The use of marker haplotypes in animal breeding schemes. Meuwissen T, Goddard M, Genet Sel Evol 1996 28 2 161 176 10.1186/1297-9686-28-2-161 (Pubitemid 126633494)
22. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. Schaeffer LR, J Anim Breed Genet 2006 123 4 218 223 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595.x 16882088 (Pubitemid 44049951)
23. Comparison of analyses of the QTLMAS XIII common dataset. I: genomic selection. Bastiaansen J, Bink M, Coster A, Maliepaard C, Calus M, BMC Proceedings 2010 4 Suppl 1 1 10.1186/1753-6561-4-s1-s1 20380752
24. Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle. Pszczola M, Mulder HA, Calus MPL, J Dairy Sci 2011 94 1 431 441 10.3168/jds.2009-2840 21183054
25. The Impact of Genetic Architecture on Genome-Wide Evaluation Methods. Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA, Genetics 185 3 1021 1031 10.1534/genetics.110.116855 20407128
26. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried F-R, Lichtner P, Thaller G, Genet Sel Evol 2010 42 1 5 17 10.1186/1297-9686-42-5 20170500
27. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers. Moser G, Tier B, Crump R, Khatkar M, Raadsma H, Genet Sel Evol 2009 41 1 56 10.1186/1297-9686-41-56 20043835
28. Breeding value prediction for production traits in layer chickens using pedigree or genomic relationships in a reduced animal model. Wolc A, Stricker C, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton J, O'Sullivan N, Preisinger R, Habier D, Fernando R, Garrick D, et al. Genet Sel Evol 43 1 5 10.1186/1297-9686-43-5 21255418