Response of osteoblast-like cells cultured on zirconia to bone morphogenetic protein-2

Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 227-233

  Han, Seung Hee ^a   Kim, Kyoung Hwa ^a   Han, Jung Seok ^a   Koo, Ki Tae ^a   Kim, Tae Il ^a   Seol, Yang Jo ^a   Lee, Yong Moo ^a   Ku, Young ^a   Rhyu, In Chul ^a  

^a BK 21 Plus   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bone morphogenetic protein 2; Cell differentiation; Cell proliferation; Zirconium oxide

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859763040     PISSN: 20932278     EISSN: 20932286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2011.41.5.227     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Schliephake H, Reiss G, Urban R, Neukam FW, Guckel S. Metal release from titanium fixtures during placement in the mandible: an experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:502-11.
2. Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Tomlinson MJ, Gavrilovic J, Black J, Peoc'h M. Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:457-76.
3. Lalor PA, Revell PA, Gray AB, Wright S, Railton GT, Freeman MA. Sensitivity to titanium. A cause of implant failure? J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:25-8.
4. Valentine-Thon E, Schiwara HW. Validity of MELISA for metal sensitivity testing. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2003;24: 57-64.
5. Chevalier J. What future for zirconia as a biomaterial? Biomaterials 2006;27:535-43.
6. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999;20:1-25.
7. Akagawa Y, Hosokawa R, Sato Y, Kamayama K. Comparison between freestanding and tooth-connected partially stabilized zirconia implants after two years' function in monkeys: a clinical and histologic study. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:551-8.
8. Scarano A, Di Carlo F, Quaranta M, Piattelli A. Bone response to zirconia ceramic implants: an experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 2003;29:8-12.
9. Kohal RJ, Weng D, Bächle M, Strub JR. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: an animal experiment. J Periodontol 2004;75: 1262-8.
10. Depprich R, Ommerborn M, Zipprich H, Naujoks C, Handschel J, Wiesmann HP, et al. Behavior of osteoblastic cells cultured on titanium and structured zirconia surfaces. Head Face Med 2008;4:29.
11. Yamashita D, Machigashira M, Miyamoto M, Takeuchi H, Noguchi K, Izumi Y, et al. Effect of surface roughness on initial responses of osteoblast-like cells on two types of zirconia. Dent Mater J 2009;28:461-70.
12. Kohal RJ, Baechle M, Han JS, Hueren D, Huebner U, Butz F. In vitro reaction of human osteoblasts on alumina-toughened zirconia. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1265-71.
13. Hempel U, Hefti T, Kalbacova M, Wolf-Brandstetter C, Dieter P, Schlottig F. Response of osteoblast-like SAOS-2 cells to zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:174-81.
14. Suzuki A, Guicheux J, Palmer G, Miura Y, Oiso Y, Bonjour JP, et al. Evidence for a role of p38 MAP kinase in expression of alkaline phosphatase during osteoblastic cell differentiation. Bone 2002;30:91-8.
15. Sudo H, Kodama HA, Amagai Y, Yamamoto S, Kasai S. In vitro differentiation and calcification in a new clonal osteogenic cell line derived from newborn mouse calvaria. J Cell Biol 1983;96:191-8.
16. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1-review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536-43.
17. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2-review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:544-64.
18. He J, Zhou W, Zhou X, Zhong X, Zhang X, Wan P, et al. The anatase phase of nanotopography titania plays an important role on osteoblast cell morphology and proliferation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008;19:3465-72.
19. Bächle M, Butz F, Hübner U, Bakalinis E, Kohal RJ. Behavior of CAL72 osteoblast-like cells cultured on zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:53-9.