A pilot study of rhythm and timing training as a supplement to occupational therapy in stroke rehabilitation

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 728-737

  Hill, Valerie ^a   Dunn, Leah ^b   Dunning, Kari ^c,d   Page, Stephen J ^e  

^a XAVIER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Brown Mackie College   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^d Drake Center   (United States)

^e OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

occupational therapy; rhythm and timing training; stroke r habilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM DISEASE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RHYTHM; STROKE; SUPPLEMENTATION; TIME PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AGED; ARM; CLINICAL TRIAL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; KINESIOTHERAPY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIODICITY; PILOT STUDY; TIME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PERIODICITY; PILOT PROJECTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859762774     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: 19455119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1806-728     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121(7):e46-e215.
2. Gowland C, deBruin H, Basmajian JV, Plews N, Burcea I. Agonist and antagonist activity during voluntary upper-limb movement in patients with stroke. Phys Ther. 1992;72(9):624-633.
3. Thaut MH, Leins AK, Rice RR, et al. Rhythmic auditory stimulation improves gait more than NDT/Bobath training in near-ambulatory patients early poststroke: a single-blind, randomized trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(5):455-459.
4. Thaut MH, McIntosh GC, Rice RR. Rhythmic facilitation of gait training in hemiparetic stroke rehabilitation. J Neurol Sci. 1997;151(2): 207-212.
5. Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KH, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 2000;31(10):2390-2395. [erratum in Stroke. 2007;38(5):e22]
6. Luft AR, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;292(15):1853-1861.
7. Thaut MH, Kenyon GP, Hurt CP, McIntosh GC, Hoemberg V. Kinematic optimization of spatiotemporal patterns in paretic arm training with stroke patients. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(7):1073-1081.
8. Taub G, McGrew K, Keith T. Improvements in interval time tracking and effects on reading achievement. Psyc Schools. 2007;44(8): 849-863.
9. Greenspan SI, Shaffer RJ, Tuchman RF, Stemmer PJ, Jacokes JE. Effect of interactive metronome rhythmicity training on children with ADHD. Am J Occup Ther. 2001;55:155-162.
10. Kulak W, Sobaniec W. Quantitative EEG analysis in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy. NeuroRehabilitation. 2005;20:75-84.
11. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(2):206-207.
12. Adunsky A, Fleissig Y, Levenkrohn S, Arad M, Noy S. Clock drawing task, Mini Mental State Examination and cognitive Functional Independence Measure: relation to functional outcome of stroke patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2002;35:153-160.
13. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.
14. Kopp B, Kunkel A, Flor H, et al. The Arm Motor Ability Test: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(6):615-620.
15. Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(7):751-755.
16. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131-2140.
17. Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1990;57(2):82-87.
18. Eyssem I, Beelen A, Dedding C, Cardol M, Dekker J. The reproducibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:888-894.
19. Lin K, Wu C, Tickle- Degnen L, et al. Enhancing occupational performance through occupationally embedded exercise: a meta-analysis review. Occup Ther J Res. 1997;17:25-47.
20. Trombly CA, Ma H. A synthesis of the effects of occupational therapy for persons with stroke, part I: Restoration of roles, tasks, and activities. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56:250-259.