A comparison study of two different control criteria for the real-time management of urban groundwater works

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 105, Issue , 2012, Pages 21-29

  Hendricks Franssen, Harrie Jan ^b   Bauser, G ^a   Stauffer, Fritz ^a   Kaiser, Hans Peter ^c   Kuhlmann, U ^d   Kinzelbach, W ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^c Waterworks Zurich   (Switzerland)

^d TK CONSULT AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Groundwater; Hydraulic barrier; Optimal control; Particle path lines; Real time control; Well field

Indexed keywords

WELL WATER;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; INFILTRATION; KALMAN FILTER; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLLUTION EFFECT; RISK FACTOR; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; URBAN AREA;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; SWITZERLAND; URBAN AREA; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER MANAGEMENT;

SWITZERLAND; ZURICH [SWITZERLAND];

EID: 84859757979     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.024     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alcolea A., Carrera J., Medina A. Regularized pilot points method for reproducing the effect of small scale variability. Application to simulations of contaminant transport. J. Hydrol. 2008, 355(1-4):76-90.
2. Bauser G., Hendricks Franssen H.-J., Kaiser H.-P., Kuhlmann U., Stauffer F., Kinzelbach W. Real-time management of an urban groundwater well field threatened by pollution. Env. Sc. Technol. 2010, 44(17):6802-6807.
3. Barlow P.M. Two- and three-dimensional path line analysis of contributing areas to public-supply wells of Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Ground Water. 1994, 32(3).
4. Bayer P., Finkel M., Teutsch G. Combining pump-and-treat and physical barriers for contaminant plume control. Ground Water 2004, 42(6):856-867.
5. Brdys M.A., Grochowski G., Gminski T., Konarczak K., Drewa M. Hierarchical predictive control of integrated wastewater systems. Control Eng. Pract. 2008, 16(6):751-767.
6. Burgers G., van Leeuwen P.J., Evensen G. Analysis scheme in the ensemble Kalman Filter. Monthly Weather Rev. 1998, 126:1719-1724.
7. Doppler T., Hendricks Franssen H.-J., Kaiser H.P., Kuhlmann U., Stauffer F. Field evidence of a dynamic leakage coefficient for modelling river-aquifer interactions. J. Hydrol. 2007, 347:177-187.
8. Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern (EDI) Hygieneverordnung des EDI. (" Food hygiene regulation of the Swiss Federal Department of the Interior" ) 2010, http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/8/817.024.1.de.pdf.
9. Engeler I., Hendricks Franssen H.-J., Müller R., Stauffer F. The importance of coupled modelling of variable saturated groundwater flow-heat transport for assessing river-aquifer interactions. J. Hydrol. 2011, 397:295-305. 10.1016/j.hydrol.2010.12.007.
10. Evensen G. Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods in forecast error studies. J. Geophys. Res. - Oceans 1994, C5:10143-10162.
11. Hendricks Franssen H.-J., Kinzelbach W. Ensemble Kalman filtering versus sequential self-calibration for transient inverse modeling of dynamic groundwater flow systems. J. Hydrol. 2009, 365:261-274.
12. Hendricks Franssen H.-J., Kaiser H.-P., Kuhlmann U., Bauser G., Stauffer F., Müller R., Kinzelbach W. Operational real time modelling with EnKF of variably saturated subsurface flow including stream-aquifer interaction and parameter updating. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47:W02532. 10.1029/2010WR009480.
13. Jäckli, H., 1992. Abstell- und Unterhaltsanlage SBB Zürich-Herdern. Hauptuntersuchung Umweltverträglichkeit. Teilbericht Hydrogeologie (" Maintanenance area of Swiss Federal Railways at Zurich-Herdern. Main analysis of environmental impact. Partial report" ). Dr. Heinrich Jäckli AG, Zürich, Switzerland. (Not published).
14. Kaiser, H.-P., 2001. Grundwasserströmungen im Hardhof, Tracerversuche 2000/2001. (" Groundwater flow in the Hardhof. Tracer tests 2000/2001" ). Water works of the city of Zurich, Switzerland. (Not published).
15. Katsafirakis K.L., Mouti M., Ntrogkouli K. Optimization of groundwater resources management in polluted aquifers. Glob. NEST J. 2009, 11(3):283-290.
16. Martin N., Gorelick S.M. Semi-analytical method for departure point determination. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2005, 47:121-137.
17. Mulligan A.E., Ahlfeld D.P. Optimal plume capture design in unconfined aquifers. Book Chapter: Physicochemical Groundwater Remediation 2007, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. Smith, Burns (Eds.).
18. O'Neill G.T. Modeling Approaches for Hydraulic Control of Groundwater Contamination 1990, Contaminated Groundwater Control.
19. Passino K.M., Yurkovich S. Fuzzy Control 1998, Addison Wesley Longman, Menlo Park, CA.
20. Passino, K.M., 2011. http://www2.ece.ohio-state.edu/%7Epassino/FCcode.txt.
21. Phillips K.J., Gelhar L.W. Contaminant transport to deep wells. J. Hydraul Div. Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 1978, 104:807-819.
22. Prickett T.A., Naymik T.G., Lonnquist C.G. A Random-walk Solute Transport Model for Selected Groundwater Quality Evaluations, Bull. No. 65, Ill 1981, State Water Surv, Champaign, IL.
23. Pokrajac D. Interrelation of wastewater and groundwater management in the city of Bijeljina in Bosnia. Urban Water 1999, 1(3):243-255.
24. Shafer J.M. Reverse path line calculation of time-related capture zones in non-uniform flow. Ground Water 1987, 25(3):283-289.
25. Shammas M.I. The effectiveness of artificial recharge in combating seawater intrusion in Salalah coastal aquifer, Oman. Env. Geol. 2008, 55(1):191-204.
26. SPRING Software delta h Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH 2010, Witten, Germany.
27. Stauffer F., Guadagnini A., Butler A., Hendricks Franssen H.-J., van de Wiel N., Bakr M., Riva M., Guadagnini L. Delineation of source protection zones using statistical methods. Water Resour. Manage. 2005, 19(2):163-185.
28. Subba Rao N.V., Gurunadha Rao V.V.S. Path lines of pollutant migration in groundwater of the Visakhapatnam urban area, India. J. Hydrol. 1999, 19(9):1381-1389.
29. Tang K.S., Man K.F., Chen S., Kwong S. An optimal Fuzzy PID controller. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electronics 2001, 48:757-765.
30. Tiwary R.K., Dhakate R., Ananda Rao V., Singh V.S. Assessment and prediction of contaminant migration in ground water from chromite waste dump. Env. Geol. 2005, 48(4-5):420-429.
31. van Leeuwen M., Butler A.P., te Stroet C.B.M., Tompkins J.A. Stochastic determination of well capture zones conditioned on regular grids of transmissivity measurements. Water Resour. Res. 2000, 36(4):949-957.
32. Varljen M.D., Shafer J.M. Coupled simulation-optimization modeling for municipal ground-water supply protection. Ground Water 1993, 31(3).
33. Verbunt M., Walser A., Gurtz J., Montani A., Schär C. Probabilistic flood forecasting with a limited-area ensemble prediction system: selected case studies. J. Hydrometeorol. 2007, 8(4):897-909.
34. World Health Organization (WHO) HACCP Principles and Practice - Teacher's Handbook 2010, A WHO/ICD Training Manual in Collaboration with FAO with CD-ROM WHO/SDE/PHE/FOS/99.3.
35. Zheng C., Wang H.F., Anderson M.P., Bradbury K.R. Analysis of interceptor ditches for control of groundwater pollution. J. Hydrol. 1988, 89(1-2):67-81.