Beyond distance-invariant survival in inverse recruitment modeling: A case study in Siberian Pinus sylvestris forests

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 233, Issue , 2012, Pages 90-103

  Tautenhahn, Susanne ^a   Heilmeier, Hermann ^b   Jung, Martin ^a   Kahl, Anja ^c   Kattge, Jens ^a   Moffat, Antje ^a   Wirth, Christian ^c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOGEOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^b TU BERGAKADEMIE FREIBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Boreal forest; Establishment; Janzen Connell recruitment pattern; Realized recruitment kernel; Root competition index; Seed dispersal kernel; Survival

Indexed keywords

BOREAL FORESTS; COMPETITION INDEX; ESTABLISHMENT; JANZEN-CONNELL RECRUITMENT PATTERN; REALIZED RECRUITMENT KERNEL; SEED DISPERSAL KERNEL; SURVIVAL;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; EMPLOYMENT; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

REFORESTATION;

BOREAL FOREST; GERMINATION; RECRUITMENT (POPULATION DYNAMICS); ROOT COMPETITION; SAPLING; SEED DISPERSAL; SEEDLING ESTABLISHMENT; SURVIVAL;

PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 84859744244     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aaltonen, V., 1919. über die natürliche verjüngung der heidewälder im finnischen lappland i. (in finnish with German summary). Communicationes ex Instituto Questionum Forestalium Finlandiae 1, 1-319.
2. Adler F., Muller-Landau H. When do localized natural enemies increase species richness?. Ecology Letters 2005, 8(4):438-447.
3. Barton A. Factors controlling plant distributions: drought, competition, and fire in Montane pines in Arizona. Ecological Monographs 1993, 63(4):367-397.
4. Björkman E., Lundberg G. Studies of root competition in a poor pine forest by supply of labelled nitrogen an phosphorus. Studia Forestallia Suecica 1971, 94:1-16.
5. Boudreau S., Lawes J. Density- and distance-dependent seedling survival in a ballistically dispersed subtropical tree species philenoptera sutherlandii. Journal of Tropical Ecology 2008, 24:1-8.
6. Calogeropoulos C., Greene D., Messier C., Brais S. Refining tree recruitment models. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2003, 33(1):41-46.
7. Casella G., George E. Explaining the Gibbs sampler. American Statistician 1992, 167-174.
8. Clark D., Clark D. Spacing dynamics of a tropical rain forest tree: evaluation of the Janzen-Connell model. The American Naturalist 1984, 124(6):769-788.
9. Clark J. Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians. Ecology Letters 2005, 8(1):2-14.
10. Clark J., Silman M., Kern R., Macklin E., HilleRisLambers J. Seed dispersal near and far: patterns across temperate and tropical forests. Ecology 1999, 80(5):1475-1494.
11. Comita L., Muller-Landau H., Aguilar S., Hubbell S. Asymmetric density dependence shapes species abundances in a tropical tree community. Science 2010, 329(5989):330.
12. Connell J. On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. Dynamics of Populations 1971, 298:312.
13. DesRochers A., Gagnon R. Is ring count at ground level a good estimation of black spruce age?. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 1997, 27(8):1263-1267.
14. Dovciak M., Reich P., Frelich L. Seed rain, safe sites, competing vegetation, and soil resources spatially structure white pine regeneration and recruitment. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2003, 33(10):1892-1904.
15. Frelich L., Reich P. Neighborhood effects, disturbance, and succession in forests of the western great lakes region. Ecoscience. Sainte-Foy 1995, 2(2):148-158.
16. Gelman A., Roberts G., Gilks W. Efficient metropolis jumping hules. Bayesian Statistics 1996, 5:599-608.
17. Greene D., Canham C., Coates D., LePage P. An evaluation of alternative dispersal functions for trees. Journal of Ecology 2004, 92:758-766.
18. Greene D., Johnson E. Tree recruitment from burn edges. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 2000, 30(8):1264-1274.
19. Janzen D. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. The American Naturalist 1970, 104(940):501-528.
20. Juntunen V., Neuvonen S. Natural regeneration of Scots pine and Norway spruce close to the timberline in northern Finland. Silva Fennica 2006, 40(3):443-458.
21. Kalela E. Das verhalten der wurzeln von kieferpflanzen zu den wurzeln des mutterbaumes (in Finnish with German summary). Acta Forestalia Fennica 1942, 50:1-12.
22. Kirkpatrick S., Gelatt C., Vecchimp M. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983, 220:671-680.
23. Kuuluvainen T., Hokkanen T., Jarvinen E., Pukkala T. Factors related to seedling growth in a boreal Scots pine stand: a spatial analysis of a vegetation-soil system. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1993.
24. Kuuluvainen T., Pukkala T. Effect of crown shape and tree distribution on the spatial distribution of shade. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 1987, 40:215-231.
25. Kuuluvainen T., Pukkala T. Effects of Scots pine seed trees on the density of ground vegetation and tree seedlings. Silva Fennica 1989, 23:159-167.
26. Kuuluvainen T., Rouvinen S. Post-fire understorey regeneration in boreal Pinus sylvestris forest sites with different fire histories. Journal of Vegetation Science 2000, 11(6):801-812.
27. Lehto J. Studies on the natural reproduction of Scots pine on the upland soils of southern Finland (in Finnish with English summary). Acta Forestalia Fennica 1956, 66:1-106.
28. LePage P., Canham C., Coates K., Bartemucci P. Seed abundance versus substrate limitation of seedling recruitment in northern temperate forests of British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2000, 30(3):415-427.
29. Lewis O. Ecology: close relatives are bad news. Nature 2010, 466(7307):698-699.
30. Mangan S., Schnitzer S., Herre E., Mack K., Valencia M., Sanchez E., Bever J. Negative plant-soil feedback predicts tree-species relative abundance in a tropical forest. Nature 2010, 466(7307):752-755.
31. McCanny S. Alternatives in parent-offspring relationships in plants. Oikos 1985, 45(1):148-149.
32. Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A., Rosenbluth M., Teller A., Teller E. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1953, 21:1087-1092.
33. Muller-Landau H., Adler F. How seed dispersal affects interactions with specialized natural enemies and their contribution to the maintenance of diversity. Seed Disp: Theory and its Application in a Changing World 2007, 407-446.
34. Nathan R., Casagrandi R. A simple mechanistic model of seed dispersal, predation and plant establishment: Janzen-Connell and beyond. Journal of Ecology 2004, 92(5):733-746.
35. Nathan R., Muller-Landau H. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2000, 15(7):278-285.
36. Oijen M.V., Rougier J., Smith R. Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data. Tree Physiology 2005, 25:915-927.
37. Pacala S., Deutschman D. Details that matter: the spatial distribution of individual trees maintains forest ecosystem function. Oikos 1995, 74(3):357-365.
38. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, the R Core team, 2008. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version 3, pp. 1-89.
39. Pukkala T. Effect of spatial distribution of trees on the volume increment of a young Scots pine stand 1988, Silva Fennica.
40. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2008, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
41. Ribbens E., Silander J., Pacala S. Seedling recruitment in forests: calibrating models to predict patterns of tree seedling dispersion. Ecology 1994, 75(6):1794-1806.
42. Schenk H. Root competition: beyond resource depletion. Journal of Ecology 2006, 94(4):725-739.
43. Spiegelhalter D., Best N., Carlin B., Van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodology) 2002, 64(4):583-639.
44. Stoyan D., Wagner S. Estimating the fruit dispersion of anemochorous forest trees. Ecological Modelling 2001, 145(1):35-47.
45. Uriarte M., Canham C., Thompson J., Zimmernann J., Brokaw N. Seedling recruitment in a hurricane-driven tropical forest: light limitation, density dependence and the spatial distribution of parent trees. Journal of Ecology 2005, 93:291-304.
46. Venable D., Flores-Martinez A., Muller-Landau H., Barron-Gafford G., Becerra J. Seed dispersal of desert annuals. Ecology 2008, 89(8):2218-2227.
47. Wirth C. Fire regime and tree diversity in boreal forests: implications for the carbon cycle. Forest Diversity and Function: Temperate and Boreal Systems. Ecological Studies, Vol. 176. Ecological Studies 2005, 309-344. Springer Verlag, Berlin. M. Scherer-Lorenzen, C. Körner, E.-D. Schulze (Eds.).
48. Wirth C., Lichstein J., Dushoff J., Chen A., Chapin F. White spruce meets black spruce: dispersal, postfire establishment, and growth in a warming climate. Ecological Monographs 2008, 78(4):489-505.
49. Wirth C., Schulze E.-D., Schulze W., von Stünzner-Karbe D., Ziegler W., Miljukova I., Sogatchev A., Varlagin A., Panvyorov M., Grigoriev S., Kusnetzova W., Siry M., Hardes G., Zimmermann R., Vygodskaya N.N. Above-ground biomass and structure of pristine Siberian Scots pine forests as controlled by competition and fire. Oecologia 1999, 121(1):66-80.
50. Zackrisson O., Nilsson M., Wardle D. Key ecological function of charcoal from wildfire in the boreal forest. Oikos 1996, 77(1):10-19.
51. Zagidulina A., Tikhodeyeva M. Spatial patterns of tree regeneration and ground cover in dry Scots pine forest in Russian Karelia 2006, Ecoscience.