Efficacy of recent state implementation plans for 8-hour ozone

Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 252-261

  Pegues, Andrew H ^a   Cohan, Daniel S ^a   Digar, Antara ^a   Douglass, Catherine ^a   Wilson, Robyn S ^b  

^a Rice University   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; AIR QUALITY STANDARDS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; FORECASTING; QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

ALTERNATE APPROACHES; INTEGRAL COMPONENTS; OZONE CONCENTRATION; OZONE PRECURSORS; STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLANS; TEST METHODOLOGY; U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; WEIGHT OF EVIDENCES;

OZONE;

NITROGEN OXIDE; ORGANIC CARBON; OZONE; NITROGEN DIOXIDE;

ACT; AIR POLLUTANT; AIR POLLUTION; AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; AIR QUALITY STANDARD; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; COST; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FIELD EMISSION; GOVERNMENT; METEOROLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN; UNITED STATES; PUBLIC HEALTH; STANDARD; THEORETICAL MODEL;

AIR POLLUTANTS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NITROGEN DIOXIDE; OZONE; PUBLIC HEALTH; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;

EID: 84859707823     PISSN: 10962247     EISSN: 21622906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2011.646049     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson, J. 2006. Revisiting the SIP process: finding a better approach to cleaner air. State Bar Texas Environ. Law J., 36: 213-222.
2. Bachmann, J. 2007. Will the circle be unbroken: a history of the US national ambient air quality standards. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 57: 652-697. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.57.6.652
3. Ban-Weiss, G.A., McLaughlin, J.P., Harley, R.A., Lunden, M.M., Kirchstetter, T.W., Kean, A.J., Strawa, A.W., Stevenson, E.D. and Kendall, G.R. 2008. Long-term changes in emissions of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter from on-road gasoline and diesel vehicles. Atmos. Environ., 42: 220-232.
4. 2 from OMI. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7: 2103-2118.
5. Byun, D.W. and Schere, K.L. 2006. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3. Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Appl. Mech. Rev., 59: 51-77.
6. Chestnut, L.G., Mills, D.M. and Cohan, D.S. 2006. Cost-benefit analysis in the selection of efficient multipollutant strategies. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 56: 530-536.
7. Cohan, D.S., Boylan, J.W., Marmur, A. and Khan, M.N. 2007. An integrated framework for multipollutant air quality management and its application in Georgia. Environ. Manage., 40: 545-554.
8. Dallmann, T.R. and Harley, R.A. 2010. Evaluation of mobile source emission trends in the United States. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 115: 1-12.
9. Dunlea, E.J., Herndon, S.C., Nelson, D.D., Volkamer, R.M., San Martini, F., Sheehy, P.M., Zahniser, M.S., Shorter, J.H., Wormhoudt, J.C.Lamb, B.K. 2007. Evaluation of nitrogen dioxide chemiluminescence monitors in a polluted urban environment. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7: 2691-2704.
10. Fine, J.D. and Owen, D. 2005. Technocracy and democracy: conflicts between models and participation in environmental law and planning. Hastings Law J., 56: 901-981.
11. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division. 2009. Proposed Georgia's State Implementation Plan for the Atlanta 8-hour ozone non-attainment area
12. Gilliland, A.B., Hogrefe, C., Pinder, R.W., Godowitch, J.M., Foley, K.L. and Rao, S.T. 2008. Dynamic evaluation of regional air quality models: assessing changes in O-3 stemming from changes in emissions and meteorology. Atmos. Environ., 42: 5110-5123.
13. Hall, J.V., Brajer, V. and Lurmann, F.W. 2006. The Health and Related Economic Benefits of Attaining Healthful Air in the San Joaquin Valley, California State University: Fullerton, CA: Institute for Economic and Environmental Studies.
14. Jones, J.M., Hogrefe, C., Henry, R.F., Ku, J.Y. and Sistla, G. 2005. An assessment of the sensitivity and reliability of the relative reduction factor approach in the development of 8-hr ozone attainment plans. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 55: 13-19.
15. Lamsal, L.N., Martin, R.V., van Donkelaar, A., Steinbacher, M., Celarier, E.A., Bucsela, E., Dunlea, E.J. and Pinto, J.P. 2008. Ground-level nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from the satellite-borne Ozone Monitoring Instrument. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 113(D16): 1-15.
16. National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States, 402Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. p.
17. Obama, B.H., 2011. Statement by the President on the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/09/02/statement-president-ozone-national-ambient-air-quality-standards (http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/09/02/statement-president-ozone-national-ambient-air-quality-standards) (Accessed: 2 September 2011).
18. Roth, P.M., Reynolds, S.D. and Tesche, T.W. 2005. Air quality modeling and decisions for ozone reduction strategies. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 55: 1558-1573.
19. Scheffe, R., Hubbell, B., Fox, T., Rao, V. and Pennell, W. 2007. The rationale for a multipollutant, multimedia air quality management framework. EM.,: 14-20.
20. Sistla, G., Hogrefe, C., Hao, W., Ku, J.Y., Zalewsky, E., Henry, R.F. and Civerolo, K. 2004. An operational assessment of the application of the relative reduction factors in the demonstration of attainment of the 8-hr ozone national ambient air quality standard. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 54: 950-959.
21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1997. 40 CFR Part 50: National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone; final rule. Fed. Regist., 62: 1-37.
22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. Air quality. Fed. Regist., 69: 23858-23951. designations and classifications for the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards; early action compact areas with deferred effective dates
23. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. "Final rule to implement the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard". In Code of Federal Regulations 40 CFR Parts 51, 52, and 80
24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2007a. Latest Findings on National Air Quality: Status and Trends through 2006 EPA-454/R-07-007. Research Triangle Park, NC: EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
25. 2.5, and regional haze EPA-454/B-07-002. Research Triangle Park, NC: EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
26. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone; final rule. Fed. Regist., 73: 16436-16514.
27. x Budget Trading Program: 2008 Highlights
28. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: proposed rule. Fed. Regist., 75: 2938-3052.
29. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Federal implementation plans: interstate transport of fine particulate matter and ozone and correction of SIP approvals. Fed. Regist., 76: 48208-48483.
30. 2 observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Dis., 11: 116471-11655.
31. Vizuete, W., Biton, L., Jeffries, H.E. and Couzo, E. 2010. Evaluation of relative response factor methodology for demonstrating attainment of ozone in Houston, Texas. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 60: 838-848. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.60.7.838
32. Walsh, M.P. 2009. Moving toward clean vehicles and fuels: a global overview. EM.,: 10-15.