Comparative safety and efficiency of five percutaneous kidney biopsy approaches of native kidneys: A multicenter study

American Journal of Nephrology

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 387-393

  Bataille, Stanislas ^a   Jourde, Nomie ^a   Daniel, Laurent ^b   Mondain, Jean Ren ^c   Faure, Magali ^c   Gobert, Pierre ^d   Alcheikh Hassan, Zarih ^d   Lankester, Michel ^e   Giaime, Philippe ^f   Gaudart, Jean ^b   Dussol, Bertrand ^a   Berland, Yvon ^a   Burtey, Stphane ^a  

^a HÔPITAL DE LA CONCEPTION   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c Hôpital Font Pré   (France)

^d HÔPITAL DU BOCAGE   (France)

^e Clinique Residence du Parc   (France)

^f Clinique Bouchard   (France)

Author keywords

Efficiency; Glomerular disease; Procedure; Renal biopsy; Safety

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS; HEMATOMA; HEMATURIA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; KIDNEY ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; KIDNEY BIOPSY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROSCOPY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NEPHRECTOMY; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODENSITOMETRY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAFETY; TRANSFUSION; URINOMA;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; KIDNEY GLOMERULUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84859644196     PISSN: 02508095     EISSN: 14219670     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000337932     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bollée G, Martinez F, Moulin B, et al: Renal biopsy practice in France: results of a nationwide study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25:3579-3585.
2. Hergesell O, Felten H, Andrassy K, Kühn K, Ritz E: Safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy-retrospective analysis of 1, 090 consecutive cases. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13: 975-977. (Pubitemid 28161774)
3. Manno C, Strippoli GF, Arnesano L, et al: Predictors of bleeding complications in percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy. Kidney Int 2004; 66:1570-1577. (Pubitemid 39298392)
4. Stratta P, Canavese C, Marengo M, et al: Risk management of renal biopsy: 1, 387 cases over 30 years in a single centre. Eur J Clin Invest 2007; 37: 954-963. (Pubitemid 350151186)
5. Eiro M, Katoh T, Watanabe T: Risk factors for bleeding complications in percutaneous rena l biopsy. Clin Exp Nephrol 2005; 9: 40-45. (Pubitemid 40576883)
6. Mendelssohn DC, Cole EH: Outcomes of percutaneous kidney biopsy, including those of solitary native kidneys. Am J Kidney Dis 1995; 26: 580-585.
7. Shidham GB, Siddiqi N, Beres JA, et al: Clinical risk factors associated with bleeding after native kidney biopsy. Nephrology (Carlton) 2005; 10: 305-310. (Pubitemid 40910380)
8. Nicholson ML, Wheatley TJ, Doughman TM, et al: A prospective randomized trial of three different sizes of core-cutting needle for renal transplant biopsy. Kidney Int 2000; 58: 390-395. (Pubitemid 30429886)
9. Cozens NJ, Murchison JT, Allan PL, Winney RJ: Conventional 15-guage needle technique for renal biopsy compared with ultrasound-guided spring-loaded 18-gauge needle biopsy. Br J Radiol 1992; 65: 594-597.
10. Kim D, Kim HK, Shin G, et al: A randomized, prospective, comparative study of manual and automated renal biopsies. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 32:426-431. (Pubitemid 28411216)
11. Maya ID, Maddela P, Barker J, et al: Percutaneous renal biopsy: comparison of blind and real-time ultrasound-guided technique. Semin Dial 2007; 20:355-358.
12. Weening JJ, D'Agati VD, Schwartz MM, et al: The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J A m Soc Nephrol 2004; 15: 241-250. (Pubitemid 38140764)
13. Hoy WE, Samuel T, Hughson MD, Nicol JL, Bertram JF: How many glomerular profiles must be measured to obtain reliable estimates of mean glomerular areas in human renal biopsies? J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17: 556-563.
14. Tervaert TW, Mooyaart AL, Amann K, et al: Pathologic classification of diabetic ne-phropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21:556-563.
15. Donovan KL, Thomas DM, Wheeler DC, et al: Experience with a new method for percutaneous renal biopsy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1991; 6:731-733.
16. Carrington CP, Williams A, Griffiths DF, Riley SG, Donovan KL: Adult day-case renal biopsy: a single-centre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26: 1559-1563.
17. Whittier WL, Korbet SM: Timing of complications in percutaneous renal biopsy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15:142-147. (Pubitemid 38020705)
18. Nass K, O'Neill WC: Bedside renal biopsy: ultrasound guidance by the nephrologist. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 34: 955-959. (Pubitemid 29521717)
19. Ori Y, Neuman H, Chagnac A, et al: Using the automated biopsy gun with real-time ultrasound for native renal biopsy. Isr Med As-soc J 2002; 4:698-701. (Pubitemid 34987601)
20. Riehl J, Maigatter S, Kierdorf H, Schmitt H, Maurin N, Sieberth HG: Percutaneous renal biopsy: comparison of manual and automated puncture techniques with native and transplanted kidneys. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1994; 9: 1568-1574. (Pubitemid 24344771)
21. Atwell TD, Smith RL, Hesley GK, et al: Incidence of bleeding after 15, 181 percutaneous biopsies and the role of aspirin. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 784-789.
22. Lankester M, Ducros J, Labastie J, Lacombe P, Pascal S, Saingra S: Ponction biopsie ré-nale échoguidée. JEMU 1987; 6:275-278.
23. Scheck ner B, Pe yser A, Rube J, et al: D iag nos-tic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review. BMC Nephrol 2009: 10; 11.