Size matters: The economic value of beach Erosion and Nourishment in Southern California

Contemporary Economic Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 223-237

  Pendleton, Linwood ^a,f   Mohn, Craig ^b   Vaughn, Ryan K ^c   King, Philip ^d   Zoulas, James G ^c,e  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Cascade Econometrics   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e US Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco   (United States)

^f NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859631820     PISSN: 10743529     EISSN: 14657287     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00257.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Borsch-Supan, A. "On the Compatibility of Nested Logit Models with Utility Maximization." Journal of Econometrics, 43, 1990, 371-87.
2. Coyne, M. California Beach Nourishment History: California Coastal Commission and California Department of Boating and Waterways. Unpublished Spreadsheet of Compiled Data on Beach Nourishment Projects in California, 2000.
3. Hanemann, W. M., L. Pendleton, C. Mohn, J. Hilger, K. Kurisawa, D. Layton, C. Busch, and F. Vasquez "Using Revealed Preference Models to Estimate the Effect of Coastal Water Quality on Beach Choice in Southern California, " Report to U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); U.S. Department of the Interior: Minerals Management Service; CA Department of Fish and Game: Office of Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR); CA State Water Resources Control Board; and Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission, September 17, 2004.
4. Herriges, J. A., and C. L. Kling "Testing the Consistency of Nested Logit Models with Utility Maximization." Economic Letters, 50, 1996, 33-39.
5. Huang, J.-C., and P. J. Poor "Welfare Measurement with Individual Heterogeneity: Economic Valuation of Beach Erosion Control Programs." Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of New Hampshire, 2004.
6. Landry, C. E., A. G. Keeler, and W. Kreisel "An Economic Evaluation of Beach Erosion Management Alternatives." Marine Resource Economics, 18, 2003, 105-27.
7. Leidersdorf, C. B., R. C. Hollar, and G. Woodell "Beach Enhancement through Nourishment and Compartmentalization: The Recent History of Santa Monica Bay, " in Beach Nourishment Engineering and Management Considerations, edited by K. S. Donald and N. C. Kraus New York: American Society of Engineers, 1993, 71-85.
8. Marlowe, H. Various Government Data on Federal Beach Nourishment Projects. Washington, DC. Unpublished 2006.
9. Parsons, G. R., D. M. Massey, and T. Tomasi "Familiar and Favorite Sites in a Random Utility Model of Beach Recreation." Marine Resource Economics, 14, 2000, 299-315.
10. Pendleton, L., and J. Kildow "The Non-Market Value of California's Beaches." Shore and Beach (Journal of the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association), 74(2), 2006, 34-37.
11. Train, K. "Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences Over People." Land Economics, 74, 1998, 230-39.
12. Whitehead, J. C., C. F. Dumas, J. Herstine, J. Hill, and B. Buerger "Valuing Beach Access and Width with Revealed and Stated Preference Data." Working Paper 06-15, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, 2006.
13. Zoulas, J. G., and A. R. Orme "Multidecadal-Scale Beach Changes in the Zuma Littoral Cell, California." Physical Geography, 28(4), 2007, 277-300.