The dual-effects model of social control revisited: Relationship satisfaction as a moderator

Anxiety, Stress and Coping

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 291-307

  Knoll, Nina ^a   Burkert, Silke ^a   Scholz, Urte ^b   Roigas, Jan ^c   Gralla, Oliver ^d  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^c VIVANTES KLINIKUM AM URBAN   (Germany)

^d Urologie am Ring   (Germany)

Author keywords

affect; couples; health behavior; prostate cancer; social control; urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ARTICLE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MARRIAGE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SATISFACTION; SOCIAL CONTROL; SPOUSE; URINE INCONTINENCE;

AFFECT; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MARRIAGE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SOCIAL CONTROL, INFORMAL; SPOUSES; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 84859625939     PISSN: 10615806     EISSN: 14772205     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2011.584188     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Benoit, M., Bouthillier, D., Moss, E., Rousseau, C., & Brunet, A. 2010. Emotion regulation strategies as mediators of the association between level of attachment security and PTSD symptoms following trauma in adulthood. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 23, 101-118. doi:10.1080/10615800802638279
2. Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brisette, I., & Seeman, T. E. 2000. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 843-857. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4
3. Burkert, S., Scholz, U., Gralla, O., & Knoll, N. (forthcoming). Dyadic planning as a social and self-regulatory strategy for health behavior change: A randomized-controlled planning intervention. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. 2002. Control processes and self-organization as complementary principles underlying behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 304-315. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0604_05
5. Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. 1993. The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684-691. doi:10.1177/0146167293196003
6. Coyne, J. C., Rohrbaugh, M. J., Shoham, V., Sonnega, J. S., Nicklas, J. M., & Cranford, J.A. 2001. Prognostic importance of marital quality for survival of congestive heart failure, American Journal of Cardiology, 88, 526-529. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01731-3
7. European Association of Urology (EAU) 2010. Guidelines on prostate cancer. Retrieved from: http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/Prostate%20Cancer%202010%20June%2017th.pdf
8. Filocamo, M. T., Li Marzi, V., Del Popolo, G., Ceconi, F., Marzococo, M., Tosto, A., & Nicita, G. 2005. Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. European Urology, 48, 734-738. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.06.004
9. Fincham, F. D., Beach, S R., & Nelson, G. 1987. Attribution processes in distressed and nondistressed couples: III. Causal and responsibility attributions for spouse behavior. Cognitive Theory and Research, 11, 71-86. doi:10.1007/BF01183133
10. Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., & Downey, G. 2003. HE SAID, SHE SAID: A quasi-signal detection analysis of daily interactions between close relationship partners. Psychological Science, 14, 100-105. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01426
11. Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., Dunham, R. B., & Pierce, J. L. 1998. Single-item versus multiple item meausrement scales: an empricial comparison. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 898-915. doi:10.1177/0013164498058006003
12. Hahlweg, K. 1996. Fragebogen zur Partnerschaftsdiagnostik [Relationship Questionnaire], Göttingen: Hogrefe.
13. Hahlweg, K., Klann, N. and Hank, G. 1992. Zur Erfassung der Ehequalität: Ein Vergleich der'Dyadic Adjustment Scale' (DAS) und des'Partnerschaftsfragebogens' (PFB) [Assessment of marital quality: A comparison of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) and the Partnership Questionnaire (PFB)]. Diagnostica, 38: 312-327.
14. Helgeson, V.S., Novak, S. A., Lepore, S. J., & Eton, D. T. 2004. Spouses' social control efforts: Relations to health behavior and well-being among men with prostate cancer. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 53-68. doi:10.1177/0265407504039840
15. Hughes, M. and Gove, W. R. 1981. Living alone, social integration, and mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 87: 48-74.
16. Karantanis, E., Fynes, M., Moore, K. H., & Stanton, S. L. 2004. Comparison of the ICIQ-SF and 24-hour pad test with other measures for evaluating the severity of urodynamic stress incontinence. International Urogynecological Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, 15, 111-116. doi:10.1007/s00192-004-1123-2
17. Kendel, F., Gelbrich, G., Wirtz, M., Lehmkuhl, E., Knoll, N., Hetzer, R. and Regitz-Zagrosek, V. 2010. Predictive relationship between depression and physical functioning after coronary surgery. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170: 1717-1721.
18. Knoll, N., Burkert, S., Kramer, J., Roigas, J., & Gralla, O. (2009). Relationship satisfaction and erectile functions in men receiving laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Effects of provision and receipt of spousal social support. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 1438-1450. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01244.x
19. Knoll, N., Burkert, S., Luszczynska, A., Roigas, J., & Gralla, O. (in press). Predictors of spousal support provision: A study with couples adapting to incontinence following radical prostatectomy. British Journal of Health Psychology.
20. Knoll, N., Rieckmann, N., & Kienle, R. 2007. The other way around: Health as a predictor of perceived social support. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 20, 3-16. doi:10.1080/10615800601032823
21. Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C.-W. and Tausch, A. 1996. Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Form der Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Diagnostica, 42: 139-156.
22. Kurdek, L. A. 2004. Are gay and lesbian cohabiting couples really different from heterosexual married couples? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 880-900. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00060.x
23. Laurenceau, J.-P., & Bolger, N. 2005. Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 86-97. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.86
24. Lewis, M. A., & Butterfield, R. M. 2005. Antecedents and reactions to health-related social control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 416-427. doi:10.1177/0146167204271600
25. Lewis, M. A., & Butterfield, R. M. 2007. Social control in marital relationships: Effect of one's partner on health behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 298-319. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2007.00161.x
26. Lewis, M. A., & Rook, K. S. 1999. Social control in personal relationships: Impact on health behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychology, 18, 63-71. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.18.1.63
27. Okun, M. A., Huff, B. P., August, K. J., & Rook, K. S. 2007. Testing hypotheses distilled from four models of the effects of health-related social control. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 185-193. doi:10.1080/01973530701332245
28. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. 2006. Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448. doi:10.3102/10769986031004437
29. Resendes, L. A., & McCorkle, R. 2006. Spousal responses to prostate cancer: an integrative review. Cancer Investigation, 24, 192-198. doi:10.1080/07357900500524652
30. Robert Koch-Institute (RKI) and Society of Epidemiologic Cancer Registers in Germany 2010. Krebs in Deutschland 2005/2006: Häufigkeiten und Trends [Cancer in Germany: Frequencies and trends]. Retrieved from: http://www.ekr.med.uni-erlangen.de/GEKID/Doc/KID2010.pdf
31. Rook, K. S., & Ituarte, P. H. G. 1999. Social control, social support, and companionship in older adults' family relationships and friendships. Personal Relationships, 6, 199-211. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00187.x
32. Rook, K. S., Thuras, P. D., & Lewis, M. A. 1990. Social control, health risk taking, and psychological distress among the elderly. Psychology and Aging, 5, 327-334. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.5.3.327
33. Schafer, J. L. 1999. NORM: Multiple imputation of incomplete multivariate data under a normal model, version 2. Software for Windows 95/98/NT. Retrieved January 2, 2003, fromhttp://www.stat.psu.edu/~jls/misoftwa.html.
34. Scholz, U., Knoll, N., Roigas, J., & Gralla, O. 2008. Effects of provision and receipt of social support on adjustment to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 21, 227-241. doi:10.1080/10615800801983759
35. Spanier, G. B. 1976. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28. doi: 10.2307/350547
36. Stanford, J. L., Feng, Z., Hamilton, A. S., Gilliland, F. D., Stephenson, R. A., Eley, J. W., & Potosky, A. L. 2000. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: The Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 354-360. doi:10.1001/jama.283.3.354
37. Stephens, M. A. P., Rook, K. S., Franks, M. M., Khan, C., & Iida, M. 2010. Spouses use of social control to improve diabetic patients' dietary adherence. Families, Systems and Health, 28, 199-208. doi:10.1037/a0020513
38. Story, T. N., Berg, C. A., Smith, T. W., Beveridge, R., Henry, N. J. M., & Pearce, G. 2007. Age, marital satisfaction, and optimism as predictors of positive sentiment override in middle-aged and older married couples. Psychology and Aging, 22, 719-727. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.719
39. Thorpe, C. T., Lewis, M. A., & Sterba, K. R. 2008. Reactions to health-related social control in young adults with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 93-103. doi:10.1007/s10865-007-9125-4
40. Tucker, J. S. 2002. Health-related social control within older adults' relationships. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57B: 387-395.
41. Tucker, J. S., Orlando, M., Elliott, M. N., & Klein, D. J. 2006. Affective and behavioral response to health-related social control. Health Psychology, 25, 715-722. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.25.6.715
42. Umberson, D. 1992. Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior. Social Science & Medicine, 34, 907-917. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90259-S
43. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063