Towards Argumentation as Distributed Constraint Satisfaction

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-01-03, Issue , 2001, Pages 26-35

  Jung, Hyuckchul ^a   Tambe, Milind ^a  

^a Henry Salvatori Computer Center ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION PROBLEMS;

ARGUMENTATION STRATEGIES; COLLABORATIVE NEGOTIATION; COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING; CONFLICT RESOLUTION; CRITICAL PROBLEMS; DISTRIBUTED CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION; DISTRIBUTED CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION PROBLEM; EFFECTIVE APPROACHES; MULTI-AGENT APPLICATIONS; REAL-WORLD;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 84859618616     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Armstrong, A., and Durfee, E. 1997. Dynamic prioritization of complex agents in distributed constraint satisfaction problems. In Proceedings of IJCAI.
2. Barrett, A. 1999. Autonomy architectures for a constellation of spacecraft. In Proceedingsof Int’l Symposium on AI Robotics and Automation in Space.
3. Chia, M.; Neiman, D.; and Lesser, V. 1998. Poaching and distraction in asynchronous agent activities. In Proceedings of ICMAS. Dimopoulos, Y.; Nebel, B.; and Toni, F. 1999. Preferred arguments are harder to compute than stable extensions. In Proceedings of IJCAI.
4. Frost, D., and Dechter, R. 1995. Look-ahead value ordering for constraint satisfaction problems. In Proc. of IJCAI.
5. Hamadi, Y. 1999. Optimal distributed arc-consistency. In Proc. of Int’l Conf. on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming.
6. Jennings, N. R.; Faratin, P.; Lomuscio, A. R.; Parsons, S.; Sierra, C.; and Woodlidge, M. 2001. Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges. J. of Group Decision and Negotiation 10(2). Jung, H.; Tambe, M.; and Kulkarni, S. 2001. Argumentation as distributed constraint satisfaction: Applications and results. In Proc. of Int’l Conf. on Autonomous Agents.
7. Kraus, S.; Sycara, K.; and Evenchik, A. 1998. Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence 104.
8. Kumar, V. 1992. Algorithms for constraint-satisfaction problems: A survey. AI Magazine 12(1).
9. Liu, J., and Sycara, K. 1996. Multiagent coordination in tightly coupled task scheduling. In Proc. of ICMAS.
10. Matos, N.; Sierra, C.; and Jennings, N. 1998. Determining successful negotiation strategies: An evolutionary approach. In Proceedings of ICMAS.
11. Minton, S.; Johnston, M. D.; Philips, A.; and Laird, P. 1990. Solving large-scale constraint satisfaction and scheduling problems using a heuristic repair method. In Proc. of AAAI.
12. Parsons, S., and Jennings, N. R. 1996. Negotiation through argumentation — a preliminary report. In Proc. of ICMAS.
13. Rickel, J., and Johnson, W. L. 1997. Pedagogical agents for immersive training environments. In Proc. of Int’l Conf. on Autonomous Agents.
14. Sawamura, H.; Umeda, Y.; and Meyer, R. 2000. Computational dialectics for argument-based agent systems. In Proc. of ICMAS.
15. Scerri, P.; Pynadath, D.; and Tambe, M. 2001. Adjustable autonomy in real-world multi-agent environments. In Proc. of Int’l Conf. on Autonomous Agents.
16. Tambe, M., and Jung, H. 1999. The benefits of arguing in a team. AI Magazine 20(4).
17. Tambe, M. 1997. Towards flexible teamwork. Journalof Artificial Intelligence Research 7.
18. Tessier, C.; Chaudron, L.; and Muller, H. J., eds. 2000. Conflicting Agents. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. Toulmin, S. 1958. The uses of argument. London: Cambridge Univ Press.
20. Wooldridge, M., and Parsons, S. 2000. Languagesfor negotiation. In Proc. of ECAI.
21. Yokoo, M., and Hirayama, K. 1998. Distributed constraint satisfaction algorithm for complex local problems. In Proc. of ICMAS.