Net primary productivity estimation and its relationship with tree diversity for tropical dry deciduous forests of central India

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1199-1214

  Kale, Manish P ^a   Roy, P S ^b  

^a CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ADVANCED COMPUTING   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF REMOTE SENSING   (India)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Biomass; Carbon; Light use efficiency; Net primary productivity; Production efficiency model

Indexed keywords

DECIDUOUS FOREST; ESTIMATION METHOD; LEGUME; LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION; PHYTOMASS; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

INDIA;

ACACIA; BOSWELLIA;

EID: 84859610803     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-012-0226-1     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aber JD, Federer CA (1992) A generalized, lumped-parameter model of photosynthesis, evapotranspiration and net primary production in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems. Oecologia 92: 463-474.
2. Ahl Douglas E, Gower ST, Scott MD, Burrows SN, Norman JM, Diak GR (2004) Heterogeneity of light use efficiency in a northern Wisconsin forest: implications of modeling net primary productivity with remote sensing. Remote Sens Env 93: 168-178.
3. Awaya Y, Kodani E, Tanaka K, Lius J, Zhuang DM, Yonking J (2004) Estimation of global net primary productivity using NOAA images and meteorological data: changes between 1988 and 1993. Int J Remote Sens 25(9): 1597-1613.
4. Chabbra A, Dadhwal VK (2004) Estimating terrestrial net primary productivity over India using satellite data. Curr Sci 86(2): 269-271.
5. Collatz GJ, Ball JT, Cirivet C, Berry JA (1991) Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: A model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agri for meteo 54: 107-136.
6. Engelhardt KAM, Ritchie ME (2001) Effects of macrophyte species richness on wetland ecosystem functioning and services. Nature 411: 687-689.
7. Harvey A, Barney D, Cyril K (2009) Opportunities for achieving biodiversity conservation through REDD. Cons Lett: 1-9.
8. Hector A, Bazeley-White E, Loreau M, Otway S, Schmid B (2002) Over yielding in plant communities: testing the sampling effect hypothesis with replicated biodiversity experiments. Ecol Lett 5: 502-511.
9. Hirose T, Bazzaz FA (1998) Trade-off between light-and Nitrogen-use efficiency in canopy photosynthesis. Ann of Bot 82: 195-202.
10. Hooper DU, Dukes JS (2004) Over yielding among plant functional groups in a long-term experiment. Ecol Lett 7: 95-105.
11. Hooper DU, Vitousek PM (1997) The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. Science 277: 1302-1305.
12. Houborg R, Anderson CM, Norman JM, Wilson T, Meyers T (2009) Intercomparison of a 'bottom-up' and 'top-down' modeling paradigm for estimating carbon and energy fluxes over a variety of vegetative regimes across the U. S. Agri For Meteo 149: 2162-2182.
13. Jarvis PG, Mcnaughton KG (1986) Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. Adv Ecol Res 15: 1-49.
14. Kale M (2006) Terrestrial biomass and productivity estimation in tropical dry deciduous forests of central India using satellite remote sensing. Dissertation, University of Pune, Ph. D.
15. Kale MP, Singh S, Roy PS (2001) Satellite remote sensing (IRS -WiFS) for estimating intercepted photosynthetically active radiation in Tropical forest ecosystem. Asian J Geoin 2: 59-71.
16. Kale M, Singh S, Roy PS (2004) Biomass equations of dominant species of dry deciduous forest in Shivpuri district (M. P.). Curr Sci 87(5): 683-687.
17. Lagergren F, Eklundh L (2005) Net primary production and light use efficiency in a mixed coniferous forest in Sweden. Plant, Cell Environ 28: 412-423.
18. Landsberg JJ, Prince SD, Jarvis PG, McMurtrie RE, Luxmoore R, Medlyn BE (1996) Energy conversion and use in forests: the analysis of forest production in terms of radiation utilization efficiency. In: Gholz HL, Nakane K, Shimoda H (eds) The use of remote sensing in the modeling of forest productivity. Kluwer Acad Publ, Dodrecht, pp 273-298.
19. Lawton JH (1998) Pigeons, peregrines and people. Oikos 83(2): 209-211.
20. Lo Seen CD, Mougin E, Etchegorry G (1993) Relating the global vegetation index to net primary productivity and actual evapotranspiration over Africa. Int J Remote Sens 14(8): 1517-1546.
21. Marcon CJ, Peterson KM (2002) The utility of estimating net primary productivity over Alaska using baseline AVHRR data. Int J Remote Sens 23(21): 4571-4596.
22. Matsushita B, Masayuki T (2002) Integrating remotely sensed data with an ecosystem model to estimate net primary productivity in East Asia. Remote Sens Environ 81: 58-66.
23. Miles L, Kapos V (2008) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: global land-use implications. Science 320: 1454-1455.
24. Monteith JL (1972) Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. J Appl Ecol 9: 747-767.
25. Mooley DA (1981) Annual rain-water over India, its variability and impact on the economy. J Climatol 1: 167-186.
26. Murphy PG, Lugo AE (1986) Ecology of tropical dry forest. Anal Rev Ecol Syst 17: 67-88.
27. Naeem S, Thompson LJ (1994) Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368(6473): 734-737.
28. Nayak KR, Patel NR, Dadhwal VK (2010) Estimation and analysis of terrestrial net primary productivity over India by remote-sensing-driven terrestrial biosphere model. Environ Monit Assess 170: 195-213.
29. Norman JM, Jarvis PG (1975) Photosynthesis in Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis Bong. Carr.) V. Radiation Penetration theory and a test case. J Appl Ecol 12: 839-878.
30. Paine RT (2002) Trophic control of production in a rocky intertidal community. Science 296(5568): 736-739.
31. Pant GB, Rupa KK (1997) Climates of South Asia. Wiley, Chichester 320.
32. Parthasarathy B, Sontakke NA, Monot AA, Kothawale DR (1987) Droughts/floods in the summer monsoon rainfall season over different meteorological subdivisions of India for the period 1871-1984. J Climatol 7: 57-70.
33. Potter CS, Randerson JT, Field CB, Matson PA, Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Klooster SA (1993) Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochem Cycl 7: 811-841.
34. Prince SD (1991) A model for regional primary production for use with coarse-resolution satellite data. Int J Remote Sens 12: 1313-1330.
35. Prince SD, Goward SJ (1995) Global Primary Production: A remote sensing approach. J Biogeog 22: 815-835.
36. Roy PS, Jain A (1998) A satellite remote sensing based approach to estimate regional net primary productivity of forest. In: global change studies scientific results from ISRO geosphere biosphere program.
37. Roy PS, Ravan SA (1996) Biomass estimation using satellite remote sensing data-An investigation on possible approaches for natural forest. J Biosci 21: 535-561.
38. Ruimy A, Dedieu G, Saugier B (1994) Methodology for the estimation of terrestrial net primary production from remotely sensed data. J Geophys Res 99: 5263-5284.
39. Running SW, Coughlan JC (1988) A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production process. Ecol Mod 42: 125-154.
40. Running SW, Gower ST (1991) FOREST- BGC, a general model for forest ecosystem processes for regional applications II dynamic carbon allocation and nitrogen budgets. Tree Physiol 9: 147-160.
41. Running SW, Hunt ER (1993) Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, BIOME-BGC, and an application for global scale models. In: Ehleringer JR, Field CB (eds) Scaling Physiological Processes: Leaf to globe. San Diego, Academic, pp 141-158.
42. Singh KP, Misra R (1979) Structure and functioning of natural, modified and silviculture ecosystems in eastern Uttar Pradesh, final technical report (1975-1978), MAB research project 1. Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi.
43. Singh L, Singh JS (1991) Species structure, dry matter dynamics and carbon flux of a dry tropical forest in India. Ann of Bot 68: 263-273.
44. Spae'kova I, Leps J (2001) Procedure for separating the selection effect from other effects in diversity-productivity relationships. Ecol Letts 4: 585-594.
45. Thompson I, Mackey B, McNulty S, Mosseler A (2009) Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change. A synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal. Technical Series, pp 3-67.
46. Tilman D, Knops J (1997) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277(5330): 1300-1302.
47. Tilman D, Wedin D, Knops J (1996) Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379(6567): 718-720.
48. Tiwari AK (1992) Component-wise biomass models for trees: a non-harvest technique. Ind Fores 404-410.
49. Troumbis AY, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Siamantziouras AS, Memtsas D (2000) Hidden diversity and productivity patterns in mixed Mediterranean grasslands. Oikos 90: 549-559.
50. UNEP-WCMC (2008) Carbon and biodiversity: a demonstration atlas. Eds. Kapos V., Ravilious C, Campbell A, Dickson B, Gibbs H, Hansen M, Lysenko I, Miles L, Price J, Scharlemann JPW, Trumper K. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
51. Veroustraete F, Patyn J, Myneni RB (1996) Estimating net ecosystem exchange of carbon using the normalised difference vegetation index and an ecosystem model. Remote Sens Environ 58: 115-130.
52. Walker B (1995) Conserving biological diversity through ecosystem resilience. Cons Biol 9: 747-752.
53. 2 concentrations. Global Change Biol 4(8): 797-807.
54. Waring RH, Landsberg JJ, Williams M (1998) Net primary production of forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production? Tree Physiol 18: 129-134.
55. Weinstein DA, Beolin RM, Yanni RD (1991) Modeling changes in red spruce carbon balance and allocation in response to interacting ozone and nutrient stresses. Tree Physiol 9: 127-146.
56. Woodward FI, Kelly CK (2008) Responses of global plant diversity capacity to changes in carbon dioxide concentration and climate. Ecol Lett 11: 1229-1237.
57. Yuan W, Liu S, Zhou G, Zhou Gu, Tieszen LL, Baldocchi D, Bernhofer C, Gholz H, Goldstein AH, Goulden ML, Hollinger DY, Hu Y, Law BE, Stoy PC, Vesala T, Wofs SC (2007) Deriving a light use efficiency model from eddy covariance flux data for predicting daily gross primary production across biomes. Agri For Meteo 143: 189-207.